Literature DB >> 29385602

Consistency of feed efficiency ranking and mechanisms associated with inter-animal variation among growing calves.

A Asher1, A Shabtay2, M Cohen-Zinder2, Y Aharoni2, J Miron2, R Agmon2, I Halachmi3, A Orlov2, A Haim4, L O Tedeschi5, G E Carstens5, K A Johnson6, A Brosh2.   

Abstract

This study investigated the possible mechanisms for explaining interanimal variation in efficiency of feed utilization in intact male Holstein calves. Additionally, we examined whether the feed efficiency (FE) ranking of calves (n = 26) changed due to age and/or diet quality. Calves were evaluated during three periods (P1, P2, and P3) while fed a high-quality diet (calculated mobilizable energy [ME] of 11.8 MJ/kg DM) during P1 and P3, and a low-quality diet (calculated ME of 7.7 MJ/kg DM) during P2. The study periods were 84, 119, and 127 d, respectively. Initial ages of the calves in P1, P2, and P3 were 7, 11, and 15 mo, respectively, and initial body weight (BW) were 245, 367, and 458 kg, respectively. Individual dry matter intake (DMI), average daily gain (ADG), diet digestibility, and heat production (HP) were measured in all periods. The measured FE indexes were: residual feed intake (RFI), the gain-to-feed ratio (G:F), residual gain (RG), residual gain and intake (RIG), the ratio of HP-to-ME intake (HP/MEI), and residual heat production (RHP). For statistical analysis, animals' performance data in each period, were ranked by RFI, and categorized into high-, medium-, and low-RFI groups (H-RFI, M-RFI, and L-RFI). RFI was not correlated with in vivo digestibility, age, BW, BCS, or ADG in all three periods. The L-RFI group had lowest DMI, MEI, HP, retained energy (RE), and RE/ADG. Chemical analysis of the longissimus dorsi muscle shows that the L-RFI group had a higher percentage of protein and a lower percentage of fat compared to the H-RFI group. We suggested that the main mechanism separating L- from H-RFI calves is the protein-to-fat ratio in the deposited tissues. When efficiency was related to kg/day (DMI and ADG) and not to daily retained energy, the selected efficient L-RFI calves deposited more protein and less fat per daily gain than less efficient H-RFI calves. However, when the significant greater heat increment and maintenance energy requirement of protein compared to fat deposition in tissue were considered, we could not exclude the hypothesis that variation in efficiency is partly explained by efficient energy utilization. The ranking classification of calves to groups according to their RFI efficiency was independent of diet quality and age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29385602      PMCID: PMC6093583          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skx045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  36 in total

Review 1.  Heart rate measurements as an index of energy expenditure and energy balance in ruminants: a review.

Authors:  A Brosh
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2007-01-15       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Effect of diet energy concentration and of age of Holstein-Friesian bull calves on growth rate, urea space and fat deposition, and ruminal volume.

Authors:  A Brosh; Y Aharoni; D Levy; Z Holzer
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Body composition and energy utilization by steers of diverse genotypes fed a high-concentrate diet during the finishing period: II. Angus, Boran, Brahman, Hereford, and Tuli sires.

Authors:  C L Ferrell; T G Jenkins
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Relationships between residual feed intake, average daily gain, and feeding behavior in growing dairy heifers.

Authors:  T C Green; J G Jago; K A Macdonald; G C Waghorn
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2013-03-13       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  Energy cost of cows' grazing activity: Use of the heart rate method and the Global Positioning System for direct field estimation.

Authors:  A Brosh; Z Henkin; E D Ungar; A Dolev; A Orlov; Y Yehuda; Y Aharoni
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Association of mitochondrial function with feed efficiency within a single genetic line of male broilers.

Authors:  W Bottje; M Iqbal; Z X Tang; D Cawthon; R Okimoto; T Wing; M Cooper
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Within-herd variation in energy utilization for maintenance and gain in beef cows.

Authors:  A DiCostanzo; J C Meiske; S D Plegge; T M Peters; R D Goodrich
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Different measures of energetic efficiency and their phenotypic relationships with growth, feed intake, and ultrasound and carcass merit in hybrid cattle.

Authors:  J D Nkrumah; J A Basarab; M A Price; E K Okine; A Ammoura; S Guercio; C Hansen; C Li; B Benkel; B Murdoch; S S Moore
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  FABP4 is a leading candidate gene associated with residual feed intake in growing Holstein calves.

Authors:  Miri Cohen-Zinder; Aviv Asher; Ehud Lipkin; Roi Feingersch; Rotem Agmon; David Karasik; Arieh Brosh; Ariel Shabtay
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2016-03-18       Impact factor: 3.107

10.  Relationships between postweaning residual feed intake in heifers and forage use, body composition, feeding behavior, physical activity, and heart rate of pregnant beef females.

Authors:  A N Hafla; G E Carstens; T D A Forbes; L O Tedeschi; J C Bailey; J T Walter; J R Johnson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-08-29       Impact factor: 3.159

View more
  5 in total

1.  Characterization of feeding behavior traits in steers with divergent residual feed intake consuming a high-concentrate diet.

Authors:  Ira L Parsons; Jocelyn R Johnson; William C Kayser; Luis O Tedeschi; Gordon E Carstens
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Technical note: a nose ring sensor system to monitor dairy cow cardiovascular and respiratory metrics.

Authors:  Yael Salzer; Guy Lidor; Lavie Rosenfeld; Liad Reshef; Ben Shaked; Joseph Grinshpun; Hen H Honig; Hadar Kamer; Moria Balaklav; Maya Ross
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2022-09-01       Impact factor: 3.338

Review 3.  Understanding the role of rumen epithelial host-microbe interactions in cattle feed efficiency.

Authors:  Sang Weon Na; Le Luo Guan
Journal:  Anim Nutr       Date:  2022-04-16

4.  Animals selected for postweaning weight gain rate have similar maintenance energy requirements regardless of their residual feed intake classification.

Authors:  Camila Delveaux Araujo Batalha; Luís Orlindo Tedeschi; Fabiana Lana de Araújo; Renata Helena Branco; Joslaine Noely Dos Santos Gonçalves Cyrillo; Sarah Figueiredo Martins Bonilha
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2021-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Relationships among feed efficiency traits across production segments and production cycles in cattle.

Authors:  Phillip A Lancaster; Michael E Davis; Jack J Rutledge; Larry V Cundiff
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2021-06-23
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.