Literature DB >> 29385520

Zinc injection as a novel castration method in beef bulls: effects on performance, behavior, and testosterone and haptoglobin concentration.

Jase J Ball1, Elizabeth B Kegley1, Ty E Lawrence2, Shelby L Roberts2, Jeremy G Powell1, John T Richeson2.   

Abstract

Crossbred beef bulls (n = 180) were blocked by initial BW (337 ± 10.9 kg; six blocks) and assigned randomly to one of three treatments on day 0: 1) INJ; received 1 mL (100 mg Zn) of a Zn solution in each testis, 2) BAN; received blood- restrictive rubber band placed around the dorsal aspect of the scrotum, 3) BUL; bulls with testicles remaining intact in a randomized complete block design (three treatment pens per block and 10 cattle per pen). A subset of 54 animals (n = 3 per pen) was fitted with accelerometers on day 0 to quantify behavior variables continuously for 28 d. Testis width and scrotal circumference, and serum haptoglobin (days 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, and 14) and testosterone concentrations (every 28 d until slaughter) were also determined for the subset. During the slaughter process, testes from INJ and BUL were collected to assess final testes weight and for histopathological evaluation. Data were analyzed using a mixed model (α = 0.05); pen served as the experimental unit for all dependent variables. Final BW was greater (P < 0.01) for INJ and BUL compared to BAN (672, 686, and 611 kg, respectively; SEM = 4.4). Overall ADG and G:F were greater (P ≤ 0.03) in INJ and BUL than BAN; whereas, DMI was similar between treatments for the study duration (P = 0.46). Histopathological evaluation (n = 13; INJ = 7; BUL = 6) indicated that INJ testes were degenerative and reproductively nonviable whereas BUL testes were normal. Serum testosterone concentrations on day 168 were similar (P = 0.14) between INJ and BUL whereas after day 14, BAN was nondetectable; however, initial serum testosterone concentrations were similarly low across treatments. Serum haptoglobin concentration was greater (P < 0.01) in INJ than BUL and BAN on days 1, 3, 5, and 7. Scrotal circumference (P = 0.08) and testis width (P = 0.07) on day 168 tended to be greater for BUL than INJ. Motion index (P ≤ 0.02) and step count (P = 0.04) was greater in BUL and INJ compared to BAN cattle during the 28 d monitoring period. No difference in standing time (P ≥ 0.85) or lying bouts (P = 0.35) occurred. Zinc injection resulted in sterilization but did not cause complete cessation of testicular function evidenced by testosterone concentrations more similar to BUL than BAN. This resulted in overall increased BW and G:F for INJ vs. BAN, yet the acute phase response was markedly greater directly after Zn injection. Collectively, Zn injection resulted in outcomes more similar to BUL than BAN, implying minimal efficacy of INJ as a castration method in older bulls arriving to the feedlot.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29385520      PMCID: PMC6093574          DOI: 10.1093/jas/skx039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  19 in total

1.  Assessment of acute pain in farm animals using behavioral and physiological measurements.

Authors:  V Molony; J E Kent
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Effects of vaccination on the acute-phase protein response and measures of performance in growing beef calves.

Authors:  J D Arthington; R F Cooke; T D Maddock; D B Araujo; P Moriel; N Dilorenzo; G C Lamb
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2013-01-23       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Bill E. Kunkle Interdisciplinary Beef Symposium: Practical developments in managing animal welfare in beef cattle: what does the future hold?

Authors:  J L Lyles; M S Calvo-Lorenzo
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Effect of castration technique on beef calf performance, feed efficiency, and inflammatory response.

Authors:  T M Warnock; T A Thrift; M Irsik; M J Hersom; J V Yelich; T D Maddock; G C Lamb; J D Arthington
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Plasma cortisol and white blood cell responses in different breeds of bulls: a comparison of two methods of castration.

Authors:  C C Chase; R E Larsen; R D Randel; A C Hammond; E L Adams
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Inflammatory response to clostridial vaccines in feedlot cattle.

Authors:  G L Stokka; A J Edwards; M F Spire; R T Brandt; J E Smith
Journal:  J Am Vet Med Assoc       Date:  1994-02-01       Impact factor: 1.936

7.  Injection of a chemical castration agent, zinc gluconate, into the testes of cats results in the impairment of spermatogenesis: a potentially irreversible contraceptive approach for this species?

Authors:  Ana Katharyne F Fagundes; Erika C S Oliveira; Bruno M Tenorio; Cibele C S Melo; Lorena T B Nery; Fábio André B Santos; Luiz Carlos Alves; Robert H Douglas; Valdemiro A Silva
Journal:  Theriogenology       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  Performance and health of weanling bulls after butorphanol and xylazine administration at castration.

Authors:  D B Faulkner; T Eurell; W J Tranquilli; R S Ott; M W Ohl; G F Cmarik; G Zinn
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  1992-10       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Effect of different methods of castration on behaviour and plasma cortisol in calves of three ages.

Authors:  I S Robertson; J E Kent; V Molony
Journal:  Res Vet Sci       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 2.534

10.  Effect of surgical castration with or without oral meloxicam on the acute inflammatory response in yearling beef bulls.

Authors:  S L Roberts; H D Hughes; N C Burdick Sanchez; J A Carroll; J G Powell; D S Hubbell; J T Richeson
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.159

View more
  1 in total

1.  The Use of an Activity Monitoring System for the Early Detection of Health Disorders in Young Bulls.

Authors:  Mohammed Anouar Belaid; Maria Rodriguez-Prado; Eric Chevaux; Sergio Calsamiglia
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2019-11-05       Impact factor: 2.752

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.