Literature DB >> 29384913

Combing a novel device and negative pressure wound therapy for managing the wound around a colostomy in the open abdomen: A case report.

Xiaofang Sun1, Shaohan Wu, Ting Xie, Jianping Zhang.   

Abstract

RATIONALE: An open abdomen complicated with small-bowel fistulae becomes a complex wound for local infection, systemic sepsis and persistent soiling irritation by intestinal content. While controlling the fistulae drainage, protecting surrounding skin, healing the wound maybe a challenge. PATIENT CONCERNS: In this paper we described a 68-year-old female was admitted to emergency surgery in general surgery department with severe abdomen pain. Resection part of the injured small bowel, drainage of the intra-abdominal abscess, and fashioning of a colostomy were performed. DIAGNOSES: She failed to improve and ultimately there was tenderness and lot of pus under the skin around the fistulae. The wound started as a 3-cm lesion and progressed to a 6 ×13  (78 cm) around the stoma.
INTERVENTIONS: In our case we present a novel device for managing colostomy wound combination with negative pressure wound therapy. OUTCOMES: This tube allows for an effective drainage of small-bowel secretion and a safe build-up of granulation tissue. Also it could be a barrier between the bowel suction point and foam. LESSONS: Management of open abdomen wound involves initial dressing changes, antibiotic use and cutaneous closure. When compared with traditional dressing changes, the NPWT offers several advantages including increased granulation tissue formation, reduction in bacterial colonization, decreased of bowel edema and wound size, and enhanced neovascularization.
Copyright © 2017 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29384913      PMCID: PMC6392989          DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000009370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)        ISSN: 0025-7974            Impact factor:   1.889


Introduction

An open abdomen (OA) could result from severe peritonitis, postlaparotomy wound dehiscence, surgical management of trauma, and other abdominal emergencies. The most critical complication of OA is the formation of a small-bowel fistula.[ It was reported that this complication occurs in 25% of patients with a mortality rate of 42%.[ An OA complicated with small-bowel fistulae becomes a complex wound for local infection, systemic sepsis, and persistent soiling irritation by intestinal content. While controlling the fistulae drainage, protecting surrounding skin and the wound maybe a challenge. Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT; KCI USA Inc, San Antonio, TX) is a popular method for the treatment of acute and chronic wounds. Also it was proved to be an effective and common method in dealing with complications of OA.[ NPWT could not only increase angiogenesis, peripheral nerve response, stimulation of cell division, granulation tissue formation but also reduce bacterial contamination, remove exudates, and securely preserve residual vital tissues in the wound.[ However, high-pressure suction applied on the foam around the wound could be risky. The wall of the bowel could become necrotic tissue or the soiling could not drain from the fistulae. Safety of the surrounding granulation tissue and bowel is a major problem. In the following sections, we are describing a novel device for managing the wound around ostomy with exposed small bowel in combing with NPWT.

Material and methods

Material

A female was 68 years old and her body mass index (BMI) was 31.6. Her medical history was notable for 10 years diabetes and 40 years hypertension. She also had colon polyps and appendicectomy. She had under gone left thigh schwannoma resection surgery. She was admitted to emergency surgery in general surgery department with severe abdomen pain. She had an enteroscopy for colon polyps by a gastroenterologist 30 minutes prior to this presentation and was feeling unwell since then. She had tachycardia of 102 beats per minute and blood pressure of 105/50 mm Hg, and a random blood glucose of 16.2 mmol/L. On abdominal examination she had generalized pain, absent bowel sounds and guarding with board-like rigidity. The diagnosis of acute peritonitis was made. After resuscitation and general anesthesia, she underwent an emergency open abdomen surgical exploration and was found to have an injury of the small bowel leading to generalized purulent peritonitis. Resection part of the injured small bowel, drainage of the intra-abdominal abscess, and fashioning of a colostomy were performed. She failed to improve and ultimately there was tenderness and lot of pus under the skin around the fistulae. The wound started as a 3 cm2 lesion and progressed to a 6×13 cm (78 cm2) around the stoma (Fig. 1A)
Figure 1

(A) 68-year-old obese patient who underwent colostomy and developed wound around the stoma with lot of pus.(B) The surgical debridement was done to remove necrotic tissue then a 6 cm undermining wound could be seen around skin.

(A) 68-year-old obese patient who underwent colostomy and developed wound around the stoma with lot of pus.(B) The surgical debridement was done to remove necrotic tissue then a 6 cm undermining wound could be seen around skin.

Methods

The wound around the fistulae was rinsed with saline irrigation. Then surgical debridement was done to remove necrotic tissue. A 6 cm wound could be seen under the around skin (Fig. 1B). The foam was cut into the shape of the wound (Fig. 2 A and B). The Brava Strip Paste (Coloplast) was used at the bottom around bowel, creating a tight seal between tissue and a 4 cm high tube around the bowel. Another piece of foam was placed onto the foam next to the wound to minimize direct suction on the bowel. The foam was covered with an adhesive drape creating a sealed environment. Then continuous negative pressure at 125 mm Hg was applied (Fig. 2C). Finally, an ostomy bag was placed over the tube assisting with Brava Strip Paste. The NPWT dressing was changed at the bedside every 5 or 7 days based on the condition of the wound and the patient. Surgery with fistula closure and abdominal closure was planned 8 weeks later. The working principle of this method could be seen in Figure 3A.
Figure 2

(A) A piece of foam was cut into the similar size of the wound. (B) This foam was put into the wound acoording to its shape. (C) The Brava Strip Paste (Coloplast) was used at the bottom around bowel, creating a tight seal between tissue and a 4 cm high tube around the bowel. Another piece of foam was placed onto the foam next to the wound to minimize direct suction on the bowel. The foam was covered with an adhesive drape creating a sealed environment. Then continuous negative pressure wound therapy was applied.

Figure 3

(A) The working principle of this combing method. (B) Four weeks later, the wound volume decreased and granulation tissue surrounded the stoma. The edema of the bowel also decreased.

(A) A piece of foam was cut into the similar size of the wound. (B) This foam was put into the wound acoording to its shape. (C) The Brava Strip Paste (Coloplast) was used at the bottom around bowel, creating a tight seal between tissue and a 4 cm high tube around the bowel. Another piece of foam was placed onto the foam next to the wound to minimize direct suction on the bowel. The foam was covered with an adhesive drape creating a sealed environment. Then continuous negative pressure wound therapy was applied. (A) The working principle of this combing method. (B) Four weeks later, the wound volume decreased and granulation tissue surrounded the stoma. The edema of the bowel also decreased.

Result

This patient underwent minor bedside debridement during NPWT dressing changes. The duration of NPWT for her was 4 weeks. The wound volume could be seen markedly decrease during NPWT. Four weeks later granulation tissue surrounded the stoma (Fig. 3B). Before the use of NPWT bowel wall edema was observed and it was improved during the period of NPWT. The patient reported less pain with NPWT dressing changes than with gauze dressing changes. The diagnosis and interventions of this patient could be seen in Figure 4.
Figure 4

The diagnosis and interventions of this patient.

The diagnosis and interventions of this patient.

Discussion

Treating a patient with colostomy and open abdomen wound is a challenging task for the surgeon. The goals include restoration of the abdominal wall integrity, protection of exposed bowel from desiccation and necrotic, control of any local and systemic infection, debridement of necrotic tissue, and preparation of the wound for cutaneous closure. Management of open abdomen wound involves initial dressing changes, antibiotic use, and cutaneous closure. When compared with traditional dressing changes, the NPWT offers several advantages including increased granulation tissue formation, reduction in bacterial colonization, decreased of bowel edema and wound size, and enhanced neovascularization.[ Patient who was treated with open abdomen wounds for planned serial re-explorations or for abdominal compartment syndrome benefited from temporary abdominal closure with NPWT.[ However, there are several reports suggest a higher fistula rate when NPWT is used to treat the OA.[ Also there was a case reported the wall of the bowel could become necrotic if the high pressure suction applied on the foam at the middle of the wound.[ Besides, there was a systematic review and meta-analysis of the OA and temporary abdominal closure techniques in non-trauma patients. They found that although NPWT could achieve the best results in terms of risk of entero-atmospheric fistula, the overall quality of the available evidence was poor, and uniform recommendations cannot be made.[ Cirocchi R performed an up-to-date systematic review on the management of OA which including the most recent published nonrandomized and randomized controlled trials to explore the effectiveness of NPWT in patients with OA. The data revealed that NPWT seems to be toward better outcomes compared to the use of no NPWT.[ The data does indicate the evidence presented in current systematic review, however, this research lack of heterogeneity and statistical significance between studies. So we highlight the need for a randomized controlled trial having homogeneous which including criteria to assess the use of NPWT for the deal with OA. Literature retrieval found a meta-analysis involving only randomized controlled trials showed that NPWT with continuous fascial closure was superior to NPWT alone for definitive fascial closure.[ Therefore, it was concluded that NPWT does effectiveness in deal with OA. What is more, the treatment strategy for fistula or small bowel should be multifaceted and multidisciplinary. Surgical treatment is the most often multistep and should be tailored to the patient, according to the characteristics and type of the fistula, following its correct classification and identification.[ A variety of therapeutic methods exists to separate the fistula or small bowel from the surrounding wound. Combing using NPWT seems to be most effective. But none of the method used will match every situation. In our case we present a novel device for managing colostomy wound combination with NPWT. This tube allows for an effective drainage of small-bowel secretion and a safe build-up of granulation tissue. Also it could be a barrier between the bowel suction point and foam. Besides, we shifted the suction point through a foam bridge outside the wound. This combing method also supports split thickness skin grafting around the ostomy wound or small-bowel fistula. Although NPWT was effective in our case and a lot of researchers have reported its functions and mechanism. There would be some bias due to lack of publications in other than English language and the unpublished works.
  15 in total

1.  Intestinal fistulization in the open treatment of peritonitis.

Authors:  Julian E Losanoff; Bruce W Richman; James W Jones
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 2.565

Review 2.  Classification, prevention and management of entero-atmospheric fistula: a state-of-the-art review.

Authors:  Salomone Di Saverio; Antonio Tarasconi; Dominik A Walczak; Roberto Cirocchi; Matteo Mandrioli; Arianna Birindelli; Gregorio Tugnoli
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2016-02-11       Impact factor: 3.445

3.  The use of vacuum-assisted closure of abdominal wounds: a word of caution.

Authors:  M Rao; D Burke; P J Finan; P M Sagar
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.788

Review 4.  Complications and Mortality Associated with Temporary Abdominal Closure Techniques: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Adam Cristaudo; Scott Jennings; Ronny Gunnarsson; Alan DeCosta
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 0.688

Review 5.  Systematic review and meta-analysis of the open abdomen and temporary abdominal closure techniques in non-trauma patients.

Authors:  J J Atema; S L Gans; M A Boermeester
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Operative management of small bowel fistulae associated with open abdomen.

Authors:  Suvit Sriussadaporn; Sukanya Sriussadaporn; Kritaya Kritayakirana; Rattaplee Pak-art
Journal:  Asian J Surg       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.767

7.  Evaluation of negative pressure vacuum-assisted system in acute and chronic wounds closure: our experience.

Authors:  S Chiummariello; G Guarro; A Pica; C Alfano
Journal:  G Chir       Date:  2012-10

8.  [Vacuum-assisted abdominal closure: its role in the treatment of complex abdominal and perineal wounds. Experience in 48 patients].

Authors:  Y Durmishi; P Gervaz; L Bühler; P Bucher; G Zufferey; A Al-Mazrouei; Ph Morel
Journal:  J Chir (Paris)       Date:  2007 May-Jun

Review 9.  Systematic review and evidence based recommendations for the use of negative pressure wound therapy in the open abdomen.

Authors:  A Bruhin; F Ferreira; M Chariker; J Smith; N Runkel
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2014-08-28       Impact factor: 6.071

Review 10.  What is the effectiveness of the negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) in patients treated with open abdomen technique? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Roberto Cirocchi; Arianna Birindelli; Walter L Biffl; Ventsislav Mutafchiyski; Georgi Popivanov; Osvaldo Chiara; Gregorio Tugnoli; Salomone Di Saverio
Journal:  J Trauma Acute Care Surg       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 3.313

View more
  2 in total

1.  Chronic mesh infection complicated by an enterocutaneous fistula successfully treated by infected mesh removal and negative pressure wound therapy: A case report.

Authors:  Hongquan Liu; Xiaochun Liu; Guofu Zheng; Bo Ye; Weiqing Chen; Hailiang Xie; Yunqiang Liu; Yi Guo
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.889

2.  Use of controlled negative pressure in management of phlegmon caused by fulminant complication of pressure wound: A case report.

Authors:  Dariusz Bazaliński; Paweł Więch; Dorota Kaczmarska; Izabela Sałacińska; Maria Kózka
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.889

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.