Angela M Feraco1,2,3,4, Sarah R Brand1,3, Joshua Gagne1, Amy Sullivan3,5, Susan D Block1,3,4, Joanne Wolfe1,2,3. 1. Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, United States. 2. Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States. 3. Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States. 4. Ariadne Labs, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, United States. 5. Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, United States.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Families' communication needs during the early cancer treatment period (ECTP) may not be optimally met by current practices. We sought to identify potential communication gaps and to ameliorate these by developing a novel in-depth conversation between families and their pediatric oncologists, the "Day 100 Talk" (D100), during the ECTP. PROCEDURE: We conducted semistructured interviews with parents and patients undergoing childhood cancer treatment for < 7 months. Interviews sought to elicit perceived communication gaps regarding cancer care and inform D100 development. Following qualitative analysis of interview responses, we developed a three-part D100 conversation tool consisting of a preparatory family worksheet, a conversation guide, and a family summary sheet. We presented the tool during interviews and a focus group with pediatric oncology providers and revised it to incorporate provider input. RESULTS: Twenty-two stakeholders (six parents, five adolescents, and 11 providers) participated in interviews or a focus group. Parents and patients perceived insufficient anticipatory guidance as the most important communication gap. They also reported sometimes withholding worries and cancer-related beliefs. Meanwhile, oncology providers worried about "opening Pandora's Box" and limited clinical time. Additionally, providers reported employing indirect methods such as surmising to determine families' needs and relying on psychosocial clinicians to engage families around potentially "taboo" issues of emotional coping and spirituality. CONCLUSION: Creating a communication occasion (D100), ensuring complementary disciplinary expertise through joint participation by oncologists and psychosocial clinicians, and providing a conversation tool to prompt disclosure by families and facilitate anticipatory guidance may ameliorate existing communication gaps during the ECTP.
BACKGROUND: Families' communication needs during the early cancer treatment period (ECTP) may not be optimally met by current practices. We sought to identify potential communication gaps and to ameliorate these by developing a novel in-depth conversation between families and their pediatric oncologists, the "Day 100 Talk" (D100), during the ECTP. PROCEDURE: We conducted semistructured interviews with parents and patients undergoing childhood cancer treatment for < 7 months. Interviews sought to elicit perceived communication gaps regarding cancer care and inform D100 development. Following qualitative analysis of interview responses, we developed a three-part D100 conversation tool consisting of a preparatory family worksheet, a conversation guide, and a family summary sheet. We presented the tool during interviews and a focus group with pediatric oncology providers and revised it to incorporate provider input. RESULTS: Twenty-two stakeholders (six parents, five adolescents, and 11 providers) participated in interviews or a focus group. Parents and patients perceived insufficient anticipatory guidance as the most important communication gap. They also reported sometimes withholding worries and cancer-related beliefs. Meanwhile, oncology providers worried about "opening Pandora's Box" and limited clinical time. Additionally, providers reported employing indirect methods such as surmising to determine families' needs and relying on psychosocial clinicians to engage families around potentially "taboo" issues of emotional coping and spirituality. CONCLUSION: Creating a communication occasion (D100), ensuring complementary disciplinary expertise through joint participation by oncologists and psychosocial clinicians, and providing a conversation tool to prompt disclosure by families and facilitate anticipatory guidance may ameliorate existing communication gaps during the ECTP.
Keywords:
childhood cancer communication; communication skills training; conversation guides; early cancer treatment period; pediatric oncology; serious illness communication
Authors: Lillian Sung; Rochelle Yanofsky; Robert J Klaassen; David Dix; Sheila Pritchard; Naomi Winick; Sarah Alexander; Anne Klassen Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2011-03-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: David W Kissane; Carma L Bylund; Smita C Banerjee; Philip A Bialer; Tomer T Levin; Erin K Maloney; Thomas A D'Agostino Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-03-12 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Jennifer W Mack; Joanne Wolfe; E Francis Cook; Holcombe E Grier; Paul D Cleary; Jane C Weeks Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2011-04-04 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Lori Wiener; Anne E Kazak; Robert B Noll; Andrea Farkas Patenaude; Mary Jo Kupst Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2015-12 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Wilson File; Carma L Bylund; Jennifer Kesselheim; David Leonard; Patrick Leavey Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2013-09-04 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Rachelle Bernacki; Mathilde Hutchings; Judith Vick; Grant Smith; Joanna Paladino; Stuart Lipsitz; Atul A Gawande; Susan D Block Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2015-10-06 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Enikő Földesi; Szilvia Zörgő; Judit Nyirő; György Péter; Gábor Ottóffy; Peter Hauser; Katalin Hegedűs Journal: Children (Basel) Date: 2022-05-02
Authors: Deena R Levine; Erik Liederbach; Liza-Marie Johnson; Erica C Kaye; Holly Spraker-Perlman; Belinda Mandrell; Michele Pritchard; April Sykes; Zhaohua Lu; Dave Wendler; Justin N Baker Journal: Cancer Date: 2019-01-02 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: A McCauley Massie; Jonathan Ebelhar; Kristen E Allen; Nicholas P DeGroote; Karen Wasilewski-Masker; Katharine E Brock Journal: Neurooncol Pract Date: 2021-03-12