Literature DB >> 29382999

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Apical Surgery: A Clinical Study.

Faruk Öğütlü1, İnci Karaca1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endodontic treatment is usually indicated when teeth with periapical lesions are encountered. However, sometimes root canal treatment results in failure. In that case, one of the treatment choices is retreatment by an orthograde approach. Surgical endodontic therapy is also an alternative to preserve the tooth. Various techniques have been suggested in the literature which has more predictable results. The introduction of modern surgical techniques have enhanced the results of apical surgery procedures. Operating microscopes, magnifying loupes, microinstruments, ultrasonic tips, and biologically acceptable root-end filling materials (such as MTA and SuperEBA) have been introduced to this field with the modern technique, thus the success rates of modern apical surgery has increased significantly.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes and periotest values of apical surgery treatment.
METHODS: A total of 112 teeth were included. SuperEBA and MTA were used as root-filling materials. The recorded parameters were gender, age, location of the tooth, the presence/absence of a post, coronal restoration of the tooth, previous surgical/nonsurgical treatment of the tooth, the size of periapical lesions, histopathology of periapical lesions, smoking habits. Also the periotest values were recorded.
RESULTS: The overall success rate was 88.4%. With regard to the evaluated variables, only one parameter (tooth type) was found statistically significant. Although the periotest values were decreased after 6 months compared to immediately postoperative measurements, the values were still significantly higher than preoperative measurements.
CONCLUSION: In this study, apical surgery performed with the modern instruments has significantly successful results with 88.4% success rate.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Apical surgery; MTA; Periotest; Super-EBA

Year:  2017        PMID: 29382999      PMCID: PMC5772023          DOI: 10.1007/s12663-017-1008-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg        ISSN: 0972-8270


  26 in total

1.  Success and failure in periradicular surgery: a longitudinal retrospective analysis.

Authors:  T Testori; M Capelli; S Milani; R L Weinstein
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  1999-04

2.  Periapical endodontic surgery: a 3-year follow-up study.

Authors:  M Maddalone; M Gagliani
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.264

Review 3.  The WHO Histological Typing of Odontogenic Tumours. A commentary on the Second Edition.

Authors:  I R Kramer; J J Pindborg; M Shear
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1992-12-15       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Retrospective evaluation of surgical endodontic treatment: traditional versus modern technique.

Authors:  Igor Tsesis; Eyal Rosen; Devorah Schwartz-Arad; Zvi Fuss
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.171

5.  Outcomes of endodontic micro-resurgery: a prospective clinical study.

Authors:  Minju Song; Su-Jung Shin; Euiseong Kim
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2011-01-08       Impact factor: 4.171

6.  Super-EBA and IRM as root-end fillings in periapical surgery with ultrasonic preparation: a prospective randomized clinical study of 206 consecutive teeth.

Authors:  Dan-Åke Wälivaara; Peter Abrahamsson; Maria Fogelin; Sten Isaksson
Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod       Date:  2011-03-31

7.  The outcome of apical microsurgery using MTA as the root-end filling material: 2- to 6-year follow-up study.

Authors:  M K Çalışkan; U Tekin; M E Kaval; M C Solmaz
Journal:  Int Endod J       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 5.264

8.  Prognostic factors relating to the outcome of endodontic microsurgery.

Authors:  Jeen-Nee Lui; Ma-Ma Khin; Gita Krishnaswamy; Nah-Nah Chen
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2014-05-27       Impact factor: 4.171

9.  Radiographic criteria for the assessment of healing after endodontic surgery.

Authors:  J Rud; J O Andreasen; J E Jensen
Journal:  Int J Oral Surg       Date:  1972

10.  Clinical outcome in periradicular surgery: effect of patient- and tooth-related factors--a multicenter study.

Authors:  Matthias Kreisler; Ricarda Gockel; Silvia Aubell-Falkenberg; Thomas Kreisler; Christoph Weihe; Andreas Filippi; Sebastian Kühl; Silvio Schütz; Bernd d'Hoedt
Journal:  Quintessence Int       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 1.677

View more
  3 in total

1.  The study of bone healing after endodontic microsurgery using cone beam computed tomography: A retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Amparo Ramis-Alario; Beatriz Tarazona-Álvarez; Miguel Peñarrocha-Diago; David Soto-Peñaloza; María Peñarrocha-Diago; David Peñarrocha-Oltra
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2022-08-01

2.  German Dentists' Preferences for the Treatment of Apical Periodontitis: A Cross-Sectional Survey.

Authors:  Jonas Conrad; Jan Retelsdorf; Sameh Attia; Christof Dörfer; Mohamed Mekhemar
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-10-13       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Prognostic Predictors of Endodontic Microsurgery: Radiographic Assessment.

Authors:  Chaonan Su; Rui Zhang; Rong Wang; Chengcan Yang; Zan Wang; Liuyan Meng
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2022-03-21       Impact factor: 2.607

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.