Literature DB >> 12657145

Periapical endodontic surgery: a 3-year follow-up study.

M Maddalone1, M Gagliani.   

Abstract

AIM: To monitor the outcome of periradicular surgery in a group of teeth treated with microsurgical technology and ultrasonic root-end preparation.
METHODOLOGY: One hundred and twenty-eight teeth with failed conventional root canal treatment were included. The surgical procedure was completed using ultrasonic retrotips and a zinc oxide-EBA (Super Seal, Ogna Pharmaceuticals. Milan, Italy)-reinforced material was used to seal the root end cavities. Lesions were examined radiologically at 1. 3. 6. 12, 24 and 36-month intervals. Radiographs were independently analysed according to a previously published classification.
RESULTS: Eight teeth were extracted due to fracture or perforations undetected radiologically: these cases were excluded from the study. Of the 120 teeth examined. the overall success rate was 92.5%; 94 healed with complete bone filling of the surgical cavity, 17 were considered to have healed by apical scar formation, four demonstrated uncertain healing and five were considered failures. Eighty of 120 teeth examined had successfully healed from a radiological point of view within 12 months. No differences in outcome occurred between anterior, premolar and molar teeth. Although all failures occurred in teeth with posts, no statistically significant difference was noted (Mann-Whitney U-test, P = 0.37).
CONCLUSION: Modern surgical endodontic procedures associated and ERA (Super Seal, Ogna Pharmaceuticals, Milan, Italy) root end fillings were successful over 3 years in 92.5% of cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 12657145     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00642.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Endod J        ISSN: 0143-2885            Impact factor:   5.264


  8 in total

1.  Ultrasonics in endodontic surgery: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Gianfranco De Paolis; Valentina Vincenti; Matteo Prencipe; Valerio Milana; Gianluca Plotino
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2010-12-08

2.  Outcome of nonsurgical retreatment and endodontic microsurgery: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Minji Kang; Hoi In Jung; Minju Song; Sue Youn Kim; Hyeon-Cheol Kim; Euiseong Kim
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-01-18       Impact factor: 3.573

3.  Prognostic Factors in Endodontic Surgery Using an Endoscope: A 1 Year Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Shintaro Sukegawa; Rieko Shimizu; Yuka Sukegawa; Kazuaki Hasegawa; Sawako Ono; Ai Fujimura; Izumi Yamamoto; Keisuke Nakano; Kiyofumi Takabatake; Hotaka Kawai; Hitoshi Nagatsuka; Yoshihiko Furuki
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-07       Impact factor: 3.748

4.  Impact of the use of plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF) on the quality of life of patients treated with endodontic surgery when a perforation of sinus membrane occurred. A comparative study.

Authors:  S Taschieri; S Corbella; I Tsesis; M Del Fabbro
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2013-01-10

5.  Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Apical Surgery: A Clinical Study.

Authors:  Faruk Öğütlü; İnci Karaca
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2017-04-08

6.  Comparison of the success rate of endodontic treatment and implant treatment.

Authors:  Ranya Faraj Elemam; Iain Pretty
Journal:  ISRN Dent       Date:  2011-06-15

7.  Factors Affecting the Success of Endodontic Microsurgery: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study.

Authors:  Daniel Bieszczad; Jaroslaw Wichlinski; Tomasz Kaczmarzyk
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-07-10       Impact factor: 4.964

8.  Management of a large periapical lesion using Biodentine(™) as retrograde restoration with eighteen months evident follow up.

Authors:  Ajinkya M Pawar; Sharad R Kokate; Reema A Shah
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2013-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.