Literature DB >> 2938275

Quantification of lumbar function. Part 4: Isometric and isokinetic lifting simulation in normal subjects and low-back dysfunction patients.

N D Kishino, T G Mayer, R J Gatchel, M M Parrish, C Anderson, L Gustin, V Mooney.   

Abstract

The present study collected the first normative data on a new dynamic isokinetic lifting device and compared a normal subject sample (n = 65) with a chronic low-back pain patient sample (n = 68) on this device. In addition, a comparison was made between isometric lifting measures collected for these controls and patients, and a normative industrial sample used in an earlier isometric testing protocol. Results demonstrated significant differences between controls and patients on all measures. An unanticipated finding was the greater lifting capacity levels of the present normal sample relative to those reported in the earlier isometric testing. These findings demonstrate that dynamic lifting simulation offers an important new tool for medical and industrial assessment, and conservative medical management.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 2938275

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  12 in total

Review 1.  Aggressive exercise as treatment for chronic low back pain.

Authors:  Isaac Cohen; James Rainville
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Biomechanical comparison of isokinetic lifting and free lifting when applied to chronic low back pain rehabilitation.

Authors:  S Bouilland; P Loslever; F X Lepoutre
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  Definition and assessment of specific occupational demands concerning lifting, pushing, and pulling based on a systematic literature search.

Authors:  J Bos; P P F M Kuijer; M H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 4.402

Review 4.  Psychosocial factors and functional capacity evaluation among persons with chronic pain.

Authors:  Michael E Geisser; Michael E Robinson; Quaintance L Miller; Suzanne M Bade
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2003-12

5.  Effect of instructions to simulate a back injury on torque reproducibility in an isometric lumbar extension task.

Authors:  M E Robinson; P O'Connor; M Macmillan; A Fuller; J E Cassisi
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1992-12

6.  Physical and psychosocial correlates of test-retest isometric torque variability in patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  M E Robinson; P D O'Connor; M Macmillan; F R Shirley; A F Greene; M E Geisser; A K Fuller
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1992-03

7.  The reliability and validity of two new tests of maximum lifting capacity.

Authors:  J Alpert; L Matheson; W Beam; V Mooney
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1991-03

8.  Effect of computerized instructions on measurement of lift capacity: Safety, reliability, and validity.

Authors:  L N Matheson; R Danner; J Grant; V Mooney
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1993-06

Review 9.  Isokinetic dynamometry. Applications and limitations.

Authors:  V Baltzopoulos; D A Brodie
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  1989-08       Impact factor: 11.136

10.  Smartphone app in self-management of chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  H S Chhabra; Sunil Sharma; Shalini Verma
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.