| Literature DB >> 29382300 |
Marlen Yelitza Carrillo-Hernández1,2,3,4, Julian Ruiz-Saenz1, Lucy Jaimes Villamizar5, Sergio Yebrail Gómez-Rangel2, Marlen Martínez-Gutierrez6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: In Colombia, the dengue virus (DENV) has been endemic for decades, and with the recent entry of the chikungunya virus (CHIKV) (2014) and the Zika virus (ZIKV) (2015), health systems are overloaded because the diagnosis of these three diseases is based on clinical symptoms, and the three diseases share a symptomatology of febrile syndrome. Thus, the objective of this study was to use molecular methods to identify their co-circulation as well as the prevalence of co-infections, in a cohort of patients at the Colombian-Venezuelan border.Entities:
Keywords: Chikungunya virus; Co-circulation; Co-infection; Dengue virus; Zika virus
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29382300 PMCID: PMC5791178 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-018-2976-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Infect Dis ISSN: 1471-2334 Impact factor: 3.090
Fig. 1Geographical location of the sampling site in Colombia. The pink area denotes Norte de Santander Province, and the blue area denotes Villa del Rosario City. The map was created using DIVA-GIS software version 7.5.0 for Windows™. See text for references
Distribution by sex and age of patients positive and negative for arboviruses
| Arbovirus negative ( | Arbovirus positive ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Male % (N) | 38.7 (29) | 30.5 (25) |
|
| Female % (N) | 61.3 (46) | 69.5 (57) | |
| Age, Years (Mean ± SEM) | 19.9 ± 1.7 | 22.6 ± 1.6 |
|
| Year (s) | |||
| 0–10 | 33.3 (25) | 26.8 (22) |
|
| 11–20 | 25.3 (19) | 19.5 (16) |
|
| 21–30 | 21.3 (16) | 28.0 (23) |
|
| 31–40 | 8.0 (6) | 11.0 (9) |
|
| 41–50 | 6.7 (5) | 7.3 (6) |
|
| Older than 50 | 5.3 (4) | 7.3 (6) |
|
*p < 0.05 = statistically significant (Student’s t-test)
Chi-squared (Χ2)
Fig. 2Temporal distribution of infection by DENV, CHIKV, and ZIKV. In general, the largest number of cases (70.7%) were reported between December 2015 and February 2016
Prevalence, attack rate, and distribution by sex and age of patients positive for DENV, CHIKV, and ZIKV
| DENV ( | CHIKV ( | ZIKV ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male % (N) | 27.3 (9) | 40.4 (19) | 13.8 (4) |
|
| Female % (N) | 72.7 (24) | 59.6 (28) | 86.2 (25) |
|
| Age, Years (Mean ± SEM) | 21.1 ± 2.0 | 21.1 ± 2.3 | 29.7 ± 2.1* | 0.006a* |
| Year (s) | ||||
| 0–10 | 24.2 (8) | 38.3 (18) | 0 (0) | 0.200b |
| 11–20 | 24.2 (8) | 14.9 (7) | 20.7 (6) | 0.366a |
| 21–30 | 33.3 (11) | 19.1 (9) | 37.9 (11) | 0.666a |
| 31–40 | 12.1 (4) | 10.6 (5) | 24.1 (7) | 0.838a |
| 41–50 | 3.0 (1) | 10.6 (5) | 6.9 (2) | 0.505c |
| Older than 50 | 3.0 (1) | 6.4 (3) | 10.3 (3) | 0.337c |
| Laboratory diagnosis | ||||
| Prevalence % (95% CI) | 21.0 (14.6–27.4) | 29.9 (22.8–37.1%) | 18.5 (12.4–24.5) |
|
| Attack rate × 100,000 Inhabitants | 40.9 × 105 | 58.4 × 105 | 36.0 × 105 |
|
*p < 0.05 = statistically significant
Kruskal-Wallis test
Unpaired t-test
One-way ANOVA
Chi-squared (Χ )
Prevalence, attack rate, and distribution by sex and age of patients with co-infections
| DENV/CHIKV ( | DENV/ZIKV ( | CHIKV/ZIKV ( | DENV/CHIKV/ZIKV ( |
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male % (N) | 50.0 (6) | 0 (0) | 12.5 (1) | 0 (0) |
|
| Female % (N) | 50.0 (6) | 100 (10) | 87.5 (7) | 100 (3) |
|
| Age, Years (mean ± SEM) | 23.2 ± 4.6 | 26.5 ± 2.6 | 30.1 ± 2.9 | 30.3 ± 4.2 | 0.492a |
| Year (s) | |||||
| 0–10 | 33.3 (4) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
|
| 11–20 | 16.7 (2) | 20.0 (2) | 12.5 (1) | 0 (0) | 0.876c |
| 21–30 | 16.7 (2) | 50.0 (5) | 25.0 (2) | 33.3 (1) | 0.475b |
| 31–40 | 16.7 (2) | 30.0 (3) | 50.0 (4) | 66.7 (2) | 0.879a |
| 41–50 | 8.3 (1) | 0 (0) | 12.5 (1) | 0 (0) |
|
| Older than 50 | 8.3 (1) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) | 0 (0) |
|
| Laboratory diagnosis | |||||
| Prevalence % (95% CI) | 7.6 (3.5–11.8) | 6.4 (2.6–10.2) | 5.1 (1.6–8.5) | 1.9 (0.0–4.1) |
|
| Attack rate × 100,000 Inhabitants | 14.9 × 105 | 12.4 × 105 | 9.9 × 105 | 4.9 × 105 |
|
*p < 0.05 = statistically significant
Kruskal-Wallis test
One-way ANOVA
Chi-squared (Χ )