| Literature DB >> 29382066 |
Ina Nepstad1, Håkon Reikvam2, Annette K Brenner3,4, Øystein Bruserud5,6, Kimberley J Hatfield7,8.
Abstract
Constitutive signaling through the phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase-Akt-mechanistic target of rapamycin (PI3K-Akt-mTOR) pathway is present in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells. However, AML is a heterogeneous disease, and we therefore investigated possible associations between cellular metabolism and sensitivity to PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway inhibitors. We performed non-targeted metabolite profiling to compare the metabolome differences of primary human AML cells derived from patients susceptible or resistant to the in vitro antiproliferative effects of mTOR and PI3K inhibitors. In addition, the phosphorylation status of 18 proteins involved in PI3K-Akt-mTOR signaling and the effect of the cyclooxygenase inhibitor indomethacin on their phosphorylation status was investigated by flow cytometry. Strong antiproliferative effects by inhibitors were observed only for a subset of patients. We compared the metabolite profiles for responders and non-responders towards PI3K-mTOR inhibitors, and 627 metabolites could be detected. Of these metabolites, 128 were annotated and 15 of the annotated metabolites differed significantly between responders and non-responders, including metabolites involved in energy, amino acid, and lipid metabolism. To conclude, leukemia cells that are susceptible or resistant to PI3K-Akt-mTOR inhibitors differ in energy, amino acid, and arachidonic acid metabolism, and modulation of arachidonic acid metabolism alters the activation of mTOR and its downstream mediators.Entities:
Keywords: PI3K; acute myeloid leukemia; mTOR; metabolism; phosphorylation
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29382066 PMCID: PMC5855604 DOI: 10.3390/ijms19020382
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Mol Sci ISSN: 1422-0067 Impact factor: 5.923
Figure 1The effect of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase-mechanistic target of rapamycin (PI3K-mTOR) inhibitors on cytokine-dependent in vitro acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cell proliferation. Leukemic cell proliferation was assayed as 3H-thymidine incorporation after six days of culture. We compared the proliferation of primary human AML cells cultured in the presence of the PI3K-inhibitor GDC-0941 and the mTOR-inhibitor rapamycin. The results are presented as the ratio of proliferation, i.e., nuclear incorporation of 3H-thymidine in drug-exposed cells relative to the incorporation in corresponding drug-free control cultures. The patient cohort included 76 patients, but detectable proliferation was only seen for the 68 AML patients whose results are presented in the figure. Each line represents the results for one patient. The dashed line indicates a ratio of 1.0, i.e., no change in proliferation.
Figure 2Principal component analysis (PCA) comparing the metabolic profiles of responders and non-responders to PI3K-mTOR inhibitors. The analysis was performed to generate an overview of the metabolic variance among the entire set of samples. Prior to this analysis, primary AML cells from 30 patients were separated into two contrasting groups based on their susceptibility to the in vitro antiproliferative effect of pathway inhibitors. The metabolic profiles for the primary AML cells derived from patients being susceptible (15 responders; grey circle) or resistant (15 non-responders; black circle) to PI3K-mTOR inhibitors were compared. The PCA depicts 71.2% (58.4 + 12.8% as indicated at the X and Y axis) of all variances in the data set. A separation of four non-responders (indicated by the asterisks *) from the rest of the sample was seen. Each circle represents the results for one patient.
A description of annotated metabolites that differed significantly between the two patient groups and were sensitive (responders) or insensitive (non-responders) to the in vitro antiproliferative effect of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase-Akt-mechanistic/mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3K-Akt-mTOR) inhibition.
| Metabolite | Ratio * | Short Description | |
|---|---|---|---|
| ↓Allose | 0.037 | −0.875 | Sugar metabolism. Possibly involved in cell cycle regulation. |
| ↓Citric acid | 0.005 | −1.262 | Energy metabolism, citric acid cycle. |
| ↓Cysteinyl-cysteine | 0.006 | −1.471 | Dipeptide |
| ↓Glutamine | 0.029 | −0.737 | Non-essential amino acid, important for nucleic acid synthesis. |
| ↓Indoleacrylic acid | 0.047 | −0.426 | Involved in tryptophan metabolism. |
| ↓Isocitric acid | 0.029 | −0.698 | Substrate of the citric acid cycle. |
| ↑Phosphatidyl inositol (18:0/0:0) | 0.040 | 0.765 | Lipid metabolism, cell membrane constituents. |
| ↑Phosphatidyl inositol (15:1(9Z)/22:6(4Z,7Z,10Z,13Z16Z19Z)) | 0.025 | 0.809 | Lipid metabolism, cell membrane constituents. |
| ↓Phosphonic acid (8:0/8:0) | 0.009 | −1.660 | Lipid metabolism |
| ↓Proline | 0.046 | −0.611 | Non-essential amino acid, synthesized from glutamic acid and also other amino acids, energy metabolism. |
| ↓Taurine | 0.035 | −1.0524 | Sulfur amino acid not incorporated into protein; adults can synthesize taurine from cysteine. Stabilizes cell membranes, regulates ion transport. |
| ↓2-amino-4-hydroxy-propiophenone | 0.021 | −0.744 | Lipid metabolism |
| ↓4-phenyl-1,2,3-thiadiazole | 0.041 | −1.024 | Inhibitor of cytochrome P450 enzymes that regulate arachidonic acid metabolism. |
| ↓4,7,10,13-eicosatetraenoic acid | 0.021 | −0.983 | Arachidonic acid metabolite, possibly influencing the leukotriene B4 (LTB4) pathway; expression of the LTB4 receptor (BLT1) may be altered in myeloid leukemia cells. |
| ↓4,7,10,13,16-docosapentaenoic acid | 0.042 | −0.766 | Fatty acid and arachidonic acid metabolism, an intermediate between eicosapentaenoic acid and docosahexaenoic acid, precursor of prostanoids that are only formed from docosapentaenoic acid. |
* Responders versus non-responders were compared as the log2-ratio. The arrows to the left in the table indicate whether the mean metabolite levels were decreased (↓) or increased (↑) in responder cells relative to the non-responder cells. The information in this table is based on PubChem and Human Metabolome databases.
Figure 3A decision tree analysis of the metabolic differences between 15 responders and 15 non-responders to PI3K-Akt-mTOR inhibition. The levels of two metabolites, cysteinyl-cysteine and threonic acid, allowed for discrimination between responders and non-responders. The 30 patients (see the upper box) were first classified into two subsets based on their cysteinyl-cysteine levels (≤ or >0.045). In the box with high cysteinyl-cysteine (>0.045; right box), there were 10 non-responders and 1 responder. The 19 patients (14 responders and 5 non-responders) with low levels of cysteinyl-cysteine (≤0.045; left box) were further subclassified into two subsets based on the level of threonic acid (≤ or >0.0145). Thirteen of the 14 responders with low levels of cysteinyl-cysteine also showed low levels of threonic acid (≤0.0145; left box). Whereas four of five non-responders among the 19 patients with low levels of cysteinyl-cysteine showed high levels of threonic acid (>0.0145; right box). Approximately ninety percent of patients were then correctly classified as responders or non-responders.
Figure 4In vitro phospho-signaling analysis of primary AML cells derived from five patients to explore the effects of indomethacin on the PI3K-Akt-mTOR pathway. AML cells were incubated in medium alone, in medium supplemented with 10 μg/mL of either indomethacin or insulin, and in medium supplemented with the combination of insulin and indomethacin. Phosphorylation status of nine mediators were examined. An indomethacin-induced decrease of mTOR pS2448, S6 pS235 pS236, and S6 pS244 was seen for all patients in insulin-free and/or insulin-supplemented cultures, and a decrease of S6 pS240 and Akt pS473 was seen for four of the five patients. The X-axis is a log-scale for fluorescence intensity; the Y-axis indicates the number of cells.
Figure 5The effect of indomethacin on the activation of PI3K-Akt-mTOR signaling. We investigated the effects of indomethacin on PI3K-Akt-mTOR signaling in primary AML cells derived from five patients. For each sample, we tested AML cells incubated in medium alone, with only indomethacin 10 μg/mL, in medium supplemented with 10 μg/mL insulin, and with the combination of insulin and indomethacin. Phosphorylation status of nine mediators were examined. Red indicates high and blue indicates low phosphorylation/expression of the mediators. All combinations tested for each patient sample also clustered together in the same subclusters for all patients. All values from the flow cytometric analyses were calculated using fold change on the Inverse hyperbolic sine (Arcsinh) scale.
Important clinical and biological characteristics of responders and non-responders to of phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase- mechanistic/mammalian target of rapamycin (PI3K-mTOR) inhibitors.
| ID | Gender | Age | Previous Hematological Malignancy or Chemotherapy | FAB | CD34 | Karyotype | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abnormality | Classification | ||||||||
| 1 | F | 45 | Chemotherapy | M4 | Negative | Normal | Normal | wt | ins |
| 2 | F | 63 | M4 | Positive | Normal | Normal | ITD | wt | |
| 3 | M | 72 | M5 | Negative | Normal | Normal | wt | ins | |
| 4 | M | 29 | Relapse | M4 | Positive | Normal | Normal | ITD | ins |
| 5 | F | 80 | M2 | Positive | Complex | Adverse | wt | wt | |
| 6 | F | 36 | M4 | Positive | Normal | Normal | wt | nt | |
| 7 | F | 75 | M1 | Positive | nt | ITD | wt | ||
| 8 | M | 71 | Relapse | M2 | Negative | Normal | Normal | G835 | |
| 9 | M | 35 | M2 | Positive | Normal | Normal | wt | wt | |
| 10 | M | 72 | Myelodysplastic syndrome | M1 | Positive | Complex | Adverse | wt | |
| 11 | F | 64 | Chemotherapy | M2 | Negative | Normal | Normal | ITD | ins |
| 12 | F | 59 | Chemotherapy | M5 | Negative | Normal | Normal | ITD | ins |
| 13 | M | 58 | M5 | Positive | Normal | Normal | wt | wt | |
| 14 | F | 59 | Chemotherapy | M4 | Negative | Normal | Normal | ITD | ins |
| 15 | F | 75 | M4 | Positive | Normal | Normal | ITD | wt | |
| 16 | F | 29 | Chemotherapy | M5 | Positive | Normal | Normal | ITD+Asp835 | wt |
| 17 | M | 24 | M2 | Positive | Multiple | Adverse | nt | wt | |
| 18 | F | 82 | M4 | Positive | Normal | Normal | ITD | wt | |
| 19 | F | 77 | M1 | Negative | nt | nt | ins | ||
| 20 | M | 84 | M1 | Positive | Multiple | Adverse | wt | wt | |
| 21 | M | 53 | M0 | Positive | 13 | Intermediate | wt | wt | |
| 22 | M | 65 | M5 | Negative | Normal | Normal | ITD | ins | |
| 23 | F | 46 | M1 | Positive | inv(16) | Favorable | wt | wt | |
| 24 | F | 70 | M4 | Negative | nt | wt | ins | ||
| 25 | M | 33 | Chemotherapy | M1 | Positive | Normal | Normal | wt | wt |
| 26 | F | 77 | M1 | Positive | nt | nt | wt | ||
| 27 | M | 76 | M0 | Positive | Normal | Normal | wt | wt | |
| 28 | M | 60 | M4 | Positive | Normal | Normal | ITD | wt | |
| 29 | M | 36 | M5 | Positive | +8, +22, inv(16) | Favorable | ITD | wt | |
| 30 | F | 67 | M5 | Negative | t(9,11), +19 | Intermediate | wt | wt | |
The table shows the gender (M, male; F, female) and age (years) of the individual patients at diagnosis. The FAB classification was used to classify morphological and/or histochemical signs of differentiation. Cytogenetic abnormalities were classified according to the medical research council (MRC) criteria. The detection of Fms like tyrosine kinase 3 (Flt3) (ITD, internal tandem duplications) or nucleophosmin (NPM)-1 insertions (ins) is also indicated in the table. Complex karyotype means at least three abnormalities [1]. FAB: The French-American-British (FAB) classification system; nt: not tested; wt: wild type.