Literature DB >> 29381490

Comparison of the effect of the antiandrogen apalutamide (ARN-509) versus bicalutamide on the androgen receptor pathway in prostate cancer cell lines.

Michael I Koukourakis1, Christos Kakouratos1, Dimitra Kalamida1, Achilleas Mitrakas1, Stamatia Pouliliou1, Erasmia Xanthopoulou1, Evdokia Papadopoulou1, Virginia Fasoulaki1, Alexandra Giatromanolaki2.   

Abstract

Apalutamide (ARN-509) is an antiandrogen that binds selectively to androgen receptors (AR) and does not show antagonist-to-agonist switch like bicalutamide. We compared the activity of ARN versus bicalutamide on prostate cancer cell lines. The 22Rv1, PC3, and DU145 cell lines were used to study the effect of ARN and bicalutamide on the expression cytoplasmic/nuclear kinetics of AR, AR-V7 variant, phosphorylated AR, as well as the levels of the AR downstream proteins prostate-specific antigen and TMPRSS2, under exposure to testosterone and/or hypoxia. The effects on autophagic flux (LC3A, p62, TFEB, LAMP2a, cathepsin D) and cell metabolism-related enzymes (hypoxia-inducible factor 1α/2α, BNIP3, carbonic anhydrase 9, LDHA, PDH, PDH-kinase) were also studied. The 22Rv1 cell line responded to testosterone by increasing the nuclear entry of AR, AR-V7, and phosphorylated AR and by increasing the levels of prostate-specific antigen and TMPRSS2. This effect was strongly abrogated by ARN and to a clearly lower extent by bicalutamide at 10 μmol/l, both in normoxia and in hypoxia. ARN had a stronger antiproliferative effect than bicalutamide, which was prominent in the 22Rv1 hormone-responsive cell line, and completely repressed cell proliferation at a concentration of 100 μmol/l. No effect of testosterone or of antiandrogens on autophagy flux, hypoxia-related proteins, or metabolism enzyme levels was noted. The PC3 and DU145 cell lines showed poor expression of the proteins and were not responsive to testosterone. On the basis of in-vitro studies, evidence has been reported that ARN is more potent than bicalutamide in blocking the AR pathway in normoxia and in hypoxia. This reflects a more robust, dose-dependent, repressive effect on cell proliferation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29381490     DOI: 10.1097/CAD.0000000000000592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anticancer Drugs        ISSN: 0959-4973            Impact factor:   2.248


  6 in total

Review 1.  Apalutamide: First Global Approval.

Authors:  Zaina T Al-Salama
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Apalutamide: A Review in Non-Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Zaina T Al-Salama
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2019-09       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Absence of PSA Flare With Apalutamide Administered 1 Hour in Advance With GnRH Agonists: Case Report.

Authors:  Zhiquan Hu; Zhenghao Liu; Zhiyuan Chen; Xing Zeng; Zhihua Wang; Chunguang Yang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-31       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  Apalutamide radio-sensitisation of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christos Kakouratos; Dimitra Kalamida; Ioannis Lamprou; Erasmia Xanthopoulou; Christos Nanos; Alexandra Giatromanolaki; Michael I Koukourakis
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 9.075

5.  TMPRSS2: Potential Biomarker for COVID-19 Outcomes.

Authors:  Jonathan D Strope; Cindy H Chau PharmD; William D Figg
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-05-21       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Apalutamide for patients with metastatic castrationsensitive prostate cancer in East Asia: a subgroup analysis of the TITAN trial.

Authors:  Byung Ha Chung; Jian Huang; Zhang-Qun Ye; Da-Lin He; Hirotsugu Uemura; Gaku Arai; Choung Soo Kim; Yuan-Yuan Zhang; Yusoke Koroki; SuYeon Jeong; Suneel Mundle; Spyros Triantos; Sharon McCarthy; Kim N Chi; Ding-Wei Ye
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2022 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.285

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.