INTRODUCTION: The combination of radiotherapy with bicalutamide is the standard treatment of prostate cancer patients with high-risk or locally advanced disease. Whether new-generation anti-androgens, like apalutamide, can improve the radio-curability of these patients is an emerging challenge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We comparatively examined the radio-sensitising activity of apalutamide and bicalutamide in hormone-sensitive (22Rv1) and hormone-resistant (PC3, DU145) prostate cancer cell lines. Experiments with xenografts were performed for the 22Rv1 cell line. RESULTS: Radiation dose-response viability and clonogenic assays showed that apalutamide had a stronger radio-sensitising activity for all three cell lines. Confocal imaging for γΗ2Αx showed similar DNA double-strand break repair kinetics for apalutamide and bicalutamide. No difference was noted in the apoptotic pathway. A striking cell death pattern involving nuclear karyorrhexis and cell pyknosis in the G1/S phase was exclusively noted when radiation was combined with apalutamide. In vivo experiments in SCID and R2G2 mice showed significantly higher efficacy of radiotherapy (2 and 4 Gy) when combined with apalutamide, resulting in extensive xenograft necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: In vitro and in vivo experiments support the superiority of apalutamide over bicalutamide in combination with radiotherapy in prostate cancer. Clinical studies are encouraged to show whether replacement of bicalutamide with apalutamide may improve the curability rates.
INTRODUCTION: The combination of radiotherapy with bicalutamide is the standard treatment of prostate cancer patients with high-risk or locally advanced disease. Whether new-generation anti-androgens, like apalutamide, can improve the radio-curability of these patients is an emerging challenge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We comparatively examined the radio-sensitising activity of apalutamide and bicalutamide in hormone-sensitive (22Rv1) and hormone-resistant (PC3, DU145) prostate cancer cell lines. Experiments with xenografts were performed for the 22Rv1 cell line. RESULTS: Radiation dose-response viability and clonogenic assays showed that apalutamide had a stronger radio-sensitising activity for all three cell lines. Confocal imaging for γΗ2Αx showed similar DNA double-strand break repair kinetics for apalutamide and bicalutamide. No difference was noted in the apoptotic pathway. A striking cell death pattern involving nuclear karyorrhexis and cell pyknosis in the G1/S phase was exclusively noted when radiation was combined with apalutamide. In vivo experiments in SCID and R2G2 mice showed significantly higher efficacy of radiotherapy (2 and 4 Gy) when combined with apalutamide, resulting in extensive xenograft necrosis. CONCLUSIONS: In vitro and in vivo experiments support the superiority of apalutamide over bicalutamide in combination with radiotherapy in prostate cancer. Clinical studies are encouraged to show whether replacement of bicalutamide with apalutamide may improve the curability rates.
Authors: Jonathan F Goodwin; Matthew J Schiewer; Jeffry L Dean; Randy S Schrecengost; Renée de Leeuw; Sumin Han; Teng Ma; Robert B Den; Adam P Dicker; Felix Y Feng; Karen E Knudsen Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2013-09-11 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Fred Saad; David Cella; Ethan Basch; Boris A Hadaschik; Paul N Mainwaring; Stéphane Oudard; Julie N Graff; Kelly McQuarrie; Susan Li; Stacie Hudgens; Joe Lawson; Angela Lopez-Gitlitz; Margaret K Yu; Matthew R Smith; Eric J Small Journal: Lancet Oncol Date: 2018-09-10 Impact factor: 41.316
Authors: Ioannis Abatzoglou; Christos E Zois; Stamatia Pouliliou; Michael I Koukourakis Journal: Biochem Biophys Res Commun Date: 2013-01-16 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Nicola J Clegg; John Wongvipat; James D Joseph; Chris Tran; Samedy Ouk; Anna Dilhas; Yu Chen; Kate Grillot; Eric D Bischoff; Ling Cai; Anna Aparicio; Steven Dorow; Vivek Arora; Gang Shao; Jing Qian; Hong Zhao; Guangbin Yang; Chunyan Cao; John Sensintaffar; Teresa Wasielewska; Mark R Herbert; Celine Bonnefous; Beatrice Darimont; Howard I Scher; Peter Smith-Jones; Mark Klang; Nicholas D Smith; Elisa De Stanchina; Nian Wu; Ouathek Ouerfelli; Peter J Rix; Richard A Heyman; Michael E Jung; Charles L Sawyers; Jeffrey H Hager Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2012-01-20 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Marta Barrado; Idoia Blanco-Luquin; Paola Andrea Navarrete; Ignacio Visus; David Guerrero-Setas; David Escors; Grazyna Kochan; Fernando Arias Journal: Rep Pract Oncol Radiother Date: 2019-02-22
Authors: Michael Brundage; Matthew R Sydes; Wendy R Parulekar; Padraig Warde; Richard Cowan; Andrea Bezjak; Peter Kirkbride; Matthew Parliament; Clare Moynihan; Jean-Paul Bahary; Mahesh K B Parmar; Karen Sanders; Bingshu E Chen; Malcolm D Mason Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2015-05-26 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Anna R Michmerhuizen; Lynn M Lerner; Connor Ward; Andrea M Pesch; Amanda Zhang; Rachel Schwartz; Kari Wilder-Romans; Joel R Eisner; James M Rae; Lori J Pierce; Corey W Speers Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2022-05-26 Impact factor: 9.075
Authors: Anna R Michmerhuizen; Lynn M Lerner; Andrea M Pesch; Connor Ward; Rachel Schwartz; Kari Wilder-Romans; Meilan Liu; Charles Nino; Kassidy Jungles; Ruth Azaria; Alexa Jelley; Nicole Zambrana Garcia; Alexis Harold; Amanda Zhang; Bryan Wharram; Daniel F Hayes; James M Rae; Lori J Pierce; Corey W Speers Journal: NPJ Breast Cancer Date: 2022-03-10