Literature DB >> 29381097

The relationship between speech recognition, behavioural listening effort, and subjective ratings.

Erin M Picou1, Todd A Ricketts1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of four subjective questions related to listening effort. A secondary purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of hearing aid beamforming microphone arrays on word recognition and listening effort.
DESIGN: Participants answered subjective questions immediately following testing in a dual-task paradigm with three microphone settings in a moderately reverberant laboratory environment in two noise configurations. Participants rated their: (1) mental work, (2) desire to improve the situation, (3) tiredness, and (4) desire to give up. Data were analysed using repeated measures and reliability analyses. STUDY SAMPLE: Eighteen adults with symmetrical sensorineural hearing loss participated.
RESULTS: Beamforming differentially affected word recognition and listening effort. Analysis revealed the same pattern of results for behavioural listening effort and subjective ratings of desire to improve the situation. Conversely, ratings of work revealed the same pattern of results as word recognition performance. Ratings of tiredness and desire to give up were unaffected by hearing aid microphone or noise configuration.
CONCLUSIONS: Participant ratings of their desire to control the listening situation appear to reliable subjective indicators of listening effort that align with results from a behavioural measure of listening effort.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Hearing aid; cognition; hearing loss; noise; self-report; speech perception

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29381097     DOI: 10.1080/14992027.2018.1431696

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Audiol        ISSN: 1499-2027            Impact factor:   2.117


  8 in total

1.  Listening in 2020: A Survey of Adults' Experiences With Pandemic-Related Disruptions.

Authors:  Karen S Helfer; Sara K Mamo; Michael Clauss; Silvana Tellerico
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 1.636

2.  Cognitive and Physiological Measures of Listening Effort During Degraded Speech Perception: Relating Dual-Task and Pupillometry Paradigms.

Authors:  Sarah Colby; Bob McMurray
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2021-09-07       Impact factor: 2.674

3.  Hearing Aid Technology Settings and Speech-in-Noise Difficulties.

Authors:  Alyssa Davidson; Nicole Marrone; Pamela Souza
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 1.636

4.  Remote Microphone Systems Can Improve Listening-in-Noise Accuracy and Listening Effort for Youth With Autism.

Authors:  Jacob I Feldman; Emily Thompson; Hilary Davis; Bahar Keceli-Kaysili; Kacie Dunham; Tiffany Woynaroski; Anne Marie Tharpe; Erin M Picou
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2022 Mar/Apr       Impact factor: 3.562

5.  A Potential Bias in Subjective Ratings of Mental Effort.

Authors:  Travis M Moore; Erin M Picou
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 2.297

6.  Moderate Reverberation Does Not Increase Subjective Fatigue, Subjective Listening Effort, or Behavioral Listening Effort in School-Aged Children.

Authors:  Erin M Picou; Brianna Bean; Steven C Marcrum; Todd A Ricketts; Benjamin W Y Hornsby
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2019-08-02

7.  Speech Recognition and Listening Effort in Cochlear Implant Recipients and Normal-Hearing Listeners.

Authors:  Khaled H A Abdel-Latif; Hartmut Meister
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  The Effects of Hearing-Aid Amplification and Noise on Conversational Dynamics Between Normal-Hearing and Hearing-Impaired Talkers.

Authors:  Eline Borch Petersen; Ewen N MacDonald; A Josefine Munch Sørensen
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.