Literature DB >> 29380819

Variation in Pathologist Classification of Colorectal Adenomas and Serrated Polyps.

Rebecca A Gourevitch1, Sherri Rose1, Seth D Crockett2, Michele Morris3, David S Carrell4, Julia B Greer5, Reetesh K Pai6, Robert E Schoen5, Ateev Mehrotra1,7.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Endoscopist quality measures such as adenoma detection rate (ADR) and serrated polyp detection rates (SPDRs) depend on pathologist classification of histology. Although variation in pathologic interpretation is recognized, we add to the literature by quantifying the impact of pathologic variability on endoscopist performance.
METHODS: We used natural language processing to abstract relevant data from colonoscopy and related pathology reports performed over 2 years at four clinical sites. We quantified each pathologist's likelihood of classifying polyp specimens as adenomas or serrated polyps. We estimated the impact on endoscopists' ADR and SPDR of sending their specimens to pathologists with higher or lower classification rates.
RESULTS: We observed 85,526 colonoscopies performed by 119 endoscopists; 50,453 had a polyp specimen, which were analyzed by 48 pathologists. There was greater variation across pathologists in classification of serrated polyps than in classification of adenomas. We estimate the endoscopist's average SPDR would be 0.5% if all their specimens were analyzed by the pathologist in our sample with the lowest classification rate and 12.0% if all their specimens were analyzed by the pathologist with the highest classification rate. In contrast, the endoscopist's average ADR would be 28.5% and 42.4% if their specimens were analyzed by the pathologist with lowest and highest classification rate, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: There is significant variation in pathologic interpretation, which more substantially affects endoscopist SPDR than ADR.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29380819      PMCID: PMC6049074          DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2017.496

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0002-9270            Impact factor:   10.864


  41 in total

1.  Developing a natural language processing application for measuring the quality of colonoscopy procedures.

Authors:  Henk Harkema; Wendy W Chapman; Melissa Saul; Evan S Dellon; Robert E Schoen; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 4.497

2.  How many endoscopies are performed for colorectal cancer screening? Results from CDC's survey of endoscopic capacity.

Authors:  Laura C Seeff; Thomas B Richards; Jean A Shapiro; Marion R Nadel; Diane L Manninen; Leslie S Given; Fred B Dong; Linda D Winges; Matthew T McKenna
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Impact of an Endoscopic Quality Improvement Program Focused on Adenoma Detection on Sessile Serrated Adenoma/Polyp Detection.

Authors:  Ronald G Racho; Murli Krishna; Susan G Coe; Colleen S Thomas; Julia E Crook; Nancy N Diehl; Michael B Wallace
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2017-04-25       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Reporting trends of right-sided hyperplastic and sessile serrated polyps in a large teaching hospital over a 4-year period (2009-2012).

Authors:  Pelvender Gill; Lai Mun Wang; Adam Bailey; James E East; Simon Leedham; Runjan Chetty
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Standardization of risk ratios.

Authors:  O S Miettinen
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1972-12       Impact factor: 4.897

6.  Serrated polyp detection rate during screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  J Liang; M F Kalady; K Appau; J Church
Journal:  Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.788

7.  Serrated lesions of the colorectum: review and recommendations from an expert panel.

Authors:  Douglas K Rex; Dennis J Ahnen; John A Baron; Kenneth P Batts; Carol A Burke; Randall W Burt; John R Goldblum; José G Guillem; Charles J Kahi; Matthew F Kalady; Michael J O'Brien; Robert D Odze; Shuji Ogino; Susan Parry; Dale C Snover; Emina Emilia Torlakovic; Paul E Wise; Joanne Young; James Church
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-06-19       Impact factor: 10.864

8.  Prevalence and variable detection of proximal colon serrated polyps during screening colonoscopy.

Authors:  Charles J Kahi; David G Hewett; Dustin Lee Norton; George J Eckert; Douglas K Rex
Journal:  Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 11.382

9.  An administrative claims model suitable for profiling hospital performance based on 30-day mortality rates among patients with an acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Harlan M Krumholz; Yun Wang; Jennifer A Mattera; Yongfei Wang; Lein Fang Han; Melvin J Ingber; Sheila Roman; Sharon-Lise T Normand
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-03-20       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Challenges in adapting existing clinical natural language processing systems to multiple, diverse health care settings.

Authors:  David S Carrell; Robert E Schoen; Daniel A Leffler; Michele Morris; Sherri Rose; Andrew Baer; Seth D Crockett; Rebecca A Gourevitch; Katie M Dean; Ateev Mehrotra
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2017-09-01       Impact factor: 4.497

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Evolving Role and Future Directions of Natural Language Processing in Gastroenterology.

Authors:  Fredy Nehme; Keith Feldman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2020-02-27       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Predictors of Incident Serrated Polyps: Results from a Large Multicenter Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Seth D Crockett; Elizabeth L Barry; Leila A Mott; Dale C Snover; Kristin Wallace; John A Baron
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2022-05-04       Impact factor: 4.090

3.  Confounders in Adenoma Detection at Initial Screening Colonoscopy: A Factor in the Assessment of Racial Disparities as a Risk for Colon Cancer.

Authors:  Yakira David; Lorenzo Ottaviano; Jihye Park; Sadat Iqbal; Michelle Likhtshteyn; Samir Kumar; Helen Lyo; Ayanna E Lewis; Brandon E Lung; Jesse T Frye; Li Huang; Ellen Li; Jie Yang; Laura Martello; Shivakumar Vignesh; Joshua D Miller; Michele Follen; Evan B Grossman
Journal:  J Cancer Ther       Date:  2019-04-09

4.  The proto CpG island methylator phenotype of sessile serrated adenomas/polyps.

Authors:  Hannah R Parker; Stephany Orjuela; Andreia Martinho Oliveira; Fabrizio Cereatti; Matthias Sauter; Henriette Heinrich; Giulia Tanzi; Achim Weber; Paul Komminoth; Stephan Vavricka; Luca Albanese; Federico Buffoli; Mark D Robinson; Giancarlo Marra
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2018-11-22       Impact factor: 4.528

Review 5.  Sessile serrated lesion detection rates during average risk screening colonoscopy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of the published literature.

Authors:  Madhav Desai; Joseph C Anderson; Michael Kaminski; Viveksandeep Thoguluva Chandrasekar; Jihan Fathallah; Cesare Hassan; David Lieberman; Prateek Sharma
Journal:  Endosc Int Open       Date:  2021-04-13

6.  Disparate age and sex distribution of sessile serrated lesions and conventional adenomas in an outpatient colonoscopy population-implications for colorectal cancer screening?

Authors:  Vidit Lall; Ali Galalah Mostafa Ismail; Oyekoya Taiwo Ayonrinde
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2022-06-04       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  Molecular Biomarkers of Sessile Serrated Adenoma/Polyps.

Authors:  Priyanka Kanth; Katherine E Boylan; Mary P Bronner; Kenneth M Boucher; Mark W Hazel; Ruoxin Yao; Stelian Pop; Philip S Bernard; Don A Delker
Journal:  Clin Transl Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 4.488

8.  The prevalence of sessile serrated lesion in the colorectum and its relationship to synchronous colorectal advanced neoplasia: a systemic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sz-Iuan Shiu; Hiroshi Kashida; Yoriaki Komeda
Journal:  Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.566

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.