| Literature DB >> 29380179 |
Yayoi Matsumura-Kimoto1, Junya Kuroda2, Hitomi Kaneko3, Yuri Kamitsuji4, Shin-Ichi Fuchida5, Aya Nakaya6, Hirohiko Shibayama7, Nobuhiko Uoshima8, Isao Yokota9, Hitoji Uchiyama10, Hideo Yagi11, Satoru Kosugi12, Toshimitsu Matsui13, Jun Ishikawa14, Mitsuhiro Matsuda15, Kensuke Ohta16, Masato Iida17, Hirokazu Tanaka18, Masayuki Kobayashi19, Katsuya Wada4, Chihiro Shimazaki5, Shosaku Nomura6, Kazunori Imada3, Masayuki Hino20, Itaru Matsumura18, Yuzuru Kanakura7, Akifumi Takaori-Kondo19.
Abstract
Determinants of the efficacy and safety of pomalidomide (POM) monotherapy or POM plus dexamethasone (DEX) (POM/DEX) for relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) were examined retrospectively in a real-world clinical practice setting in Japan. The subjects were 108 patients registered with the Kansai Myeloma Forum, who were treated with either POM or POM/DEX. Of these, 79 (73%), 73 (68%), and 58 (54%) were resistant to bortezomib (BTZ), lenalidomide (LEN), and both BTZ and LEN, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was not reached. The median time to treatment failure (TTF) was 4.4 months. The best response was recorded in 96 patients, with a 31% overall response rate (ORR) and a 79% rate of achieving at least stable disease. Number of pre-POM regimens ≥ 5, non-IgG-type M-protein, and time from initial therapy to POM or POM/DEX therapy < 2 years were associated with shorter TTF and OS. Frequent (> 10%) severe adverse events included neutropenia (55.1%), thrombocytopenia (33.7%), anemia (30.6%), febrile neutropenia (12.2%), fatigue (11.2%), and anorexia (10.2%). In conclusion, POM and POM/DEX showed substantial efficacy against RRMM, but new combination therapies with POM are needed to improve efficacy further without causing hematologic toxicities.Entities:
Keywords: Adverse events; Efficacy; Multiple myeloma; Pomalidomide
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29380179 DOI: 10.1007/s12185-018-2416-4
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Hematol ISSN: 0925-5710 Impact factor: 2.490