Literature DB >> 29379387

Factors Affecting Visual Field Outcome Post-Surgery in Sellar Region Tumors: Retrospective Study.

Prabu Rau Sriram1,2,3, Puliventhan Sellamuthu1, Abdul Rahman Izani Ghani2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the broad category of differentials for sellar region, most of them present with similar clinical signs and symptoms. Headache and visual disturbance are among the frequently seen as presenting symptom. Visual field (VF) assessment is one of the crucial component of neuroophtalmologic assessment and mean deviation (MD) value from automated perimetry allows quantification of the visual field defect. We formulated a study to look into the factors that affect the visual field outcome after surgery.
METHODS: All patients with sellar region tumor who has underwent surgery in Queen Elizabeth Hospital from July 2010 to July 2016 were retrospectively analysed through hospital notes. VF assessment via Humphrey visual assessment for these patient pre and post-surgery were reviewed for MD value.
RESULTS: Eighty four patients were recruited and out of them, 151 eyes were taken into analysis after excluding eyes with missing data. Mean age of patients were 45.4 years with 70.2% of them were male. Visual disturbance is the commonest presenting symptom with mean duration of symptom prior to surgery is 9.7 months. Majority of them were pituitary adenomas (75%) followed by sellar meningioma (19%), craniopharyngioma (4.8%), and rathke cleft cyst (1.2%). 70.9% of patients showed improvement in VF based on MD outcome. Mean MD for pre surgery and post-surgery were -14.0 dB and -12.4 dB, respectively. Univariate analysis reveals younger age, female sex, shorter duration of symptom, pituitary adenoma, transsphenoidal approach, and transcranial approach favours improvement in VF. Multivariate analysis shows only shorter symptom duration, transphenoidal approach, and transcranial approach are significant for favourable VF outcome when other factors adjusted.
CONCLUSION: Symptom duration and surgical approach were independent factors that affects the visual field after surgery in patients with sellar region tumors.

Entities:  

Keywords:  perimetry; pituitary adenoma; sellar tumor; visual field

Year:  2017        PMID: 29379387      PMCID: PMC5771516          DOI: 10.21315/mjms2017.24.6.7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Malays J Med Sci        ISSN: 1394-195X


  33 in total

1.  Intrasellar pressure and tumor volume in pituitary tumor: relation study.

Authors:  Jackson A Gondim; Osvaldo I Tella; Michele Schops
Journal:  Arq Neuropsiquiatr       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.420

2.  The time course of visual field recovery following transphenoidal surgery for pituitary adenomas: predictive factors for a good outcome.

Authors:  K K Gnanalingham; S Bhattacharjee; R Pennington; J Ng; N Mendoza
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  The thin sectional anatomy of the sellar region with MRI correlation.

Authors:  Yu Chun Tang; Zhen Mei Zhao; Xiang Tao Lin; Bo Sun; Ling Zhong Fan; Zhong Yu Hou; Heng Tao Qi; Zhen Ping Li; Shu Wei Liu
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2009-12-13       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  A power primer.

Authors:  J Cohen
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 17.737

Review 5.  Role of craniotomy in the management of pituitary adenomas and sellar/parasellar tumors.

Authors:  Wael Musleh; Adam M Sonabend; Maciej S Lesniak
Journal:  Expert Rev Anticancer Ther       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 4.512

6.  Stages of improvement in visual fields after pituitary tumor resection.

Authors:  J B Kerrison; M J Lynn; C A Baer; S A Newman; V Biousse; N J Newman
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 5.258

7.  Clinical predictors of advanced sellar masses.

Authors:  Gloria M Rambaldini; Sonia Butalia; Shereen Ezzat; Walter Kucharczyk; Anna M Sawka
Journal:  Endocr Pract       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.443

Review 8.  Pathohistological classification of pituitary tumors: 10 years of experience with the German Pituitary Tumor Registry.

Authors:  Wolfgang Saeger; Dieter K Lüdecke; Michael Buchfelder; Rudolf Fahlbusch; Hans-Jürgen Quabbe; Stephan Petersenn
Journal:  Eur J Endocrinol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 6.664

9.  Pituitary volume and headache: size is not everything.

Authors:  Miles J Levy; H Rolf Jäger; Michael Powell; Manjit S Matharu; Karim Meeran; Peter J Goadsby
Journal:  Arch Neurol       Date:  2004-05

10.  Sellar Masses: An Epidemiological Study.

Authors:  Khaled Al-Dahmani; Syed Mohammad; Fatima Imran; Chris Theriault; Steve Doucette; Deborah Zwicker; Churn-Ern Yip; David B Clarke; Syed Ali Imran
Journal:  Can J Neurol Sci       Date:  2015-11-02       Impact factor: 2.104

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.