Literature DB >> 29379299

Cancer stem cells, the ultimate targets in cancer therapy.

Ahmed Shabbir1, Tuba Esfandyari2, Faris Farassati1,3,4.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 29379299      PMCID: PMC5757206          DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S154431

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Onco Targets Ther        ISSN: 1178-6930            Impact factor:   4.147


× No keyword cloud information.
The concept of cancer stem cells (CSCs) is currently of significant interest due to its important implications in our understanding of the tumor biology as well as development of novel cancer therapeutics. Tumors, in resemblance to normal organs, contain pluripotential cells that can generate their own kind as well as cells that can further differentiate. CSCs are thought to be highly resistant to the cytotoxic effects of conventional cancer therapy regimens,1 which leads to the rise of a refractory status in tumors.1,2 Therefore, CSCs can be considered as the main drivers of tumor integrity and function. This resembles the role of normal stem cells in tissue and organ development. Therapeutic assaults that eliminate differentiated cancer cells while leaving CSCs, therefore, are doomed to fail due to the resistance of CSCs and their ability to repopulate the tumor.3 This phenomenon is indeed observed in the clinic routinely. Clinical response to a chemotherapy regimen is reduced over time as the tumor enters a refractory stage induced by enrichment of CSCs in the tumor cell population. This is even observed in cells cultured from a patient at early stage of the disease, such as in colorectal cancer (SW480, ATCC CCL-228), and recurrence of the malignancy results in a wide-spread metastasis (SW620, ATCC CCL-227). The SW260 shows a significantly higher percentage of cells positive for CD133, a marker for CSCs (data from our team). Methods for the detection of CSCs include surface markers such as CD24, CD34, CD44, CD44, CD90, CD133, ABCB5, and EpCAM that have been shown to indicate CSC subpopulations in a range of malignancies.4 Additionally, functional tests, such as detection of side population phenotype by Hoechst 33342 exclusion, the ability to grow as floating spheres in serum-free medium, and ALDH activity, have also been utilized to detect and isolate CSCs. From the therapeutic perspective, two main strategies have been claimed so far for targeting CSCs. The first strategy is based on understanding the cell signaling characteristics of CSCs. Essentially, certain pro-oncogenic cell signaling pathways are found to be overactive in CSCs at levels higher than differentiated cancer cells or nonmalignant cells. Overactivation of these pathways contribute to phenotypic features of CSCs such as resistance to apoptosis and enhanced invasiveness. Examples of these pathways include the JAK/STAT, Wnt/β-catenin, Hedgehog, Notch, and TGF-β pathways.5,6 RalA signaling pathways has been shown by our group to be over-activated in a number of human malignancies such as liver, lung, medulloblastoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors, and ovarian cancer.7–12 According to our data, while the levels of RalA expression are comparable in CSCs and differentiated cancer cells, RalAGTP (the active form of RalA) is at higher levels in CSCs. Overall, none of the aforementioned cell signaling pathways are specific for CSCs; therefore, strategies based on their inhibition might influence other cells. A series of other targets with preferential expression in CSCs include surface markers (such as CD44, CD90, CD33, and CD133),13,14 multidrug resistance pump ABC15 and markers of microenvironment (such as CXCL12/CXCR4 and VEGF/VEGFR).16 The second strategy is based on the use of oncolytic viruses. Oncolytic viruses are a promising class of replication competent viruses that in many cases are advancing through clinical trials, with one member already approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of melanoma.17–19 A number of these viruses have been claimed to destroy CSCs. Our team is focused on rational design and evaluation of mutated versions of herpes simplex-1 that are capable of targeting CSCs specifically. Our observations in this field show that targeting this minority population can effectively inhibit tumor cell growth in vitro and cause significant regression in established heterotopic and orthotopic tumors in animal models. Further research in targeting CSCs can offer highly efficient cancer remedies with minimal side effects.
  18 in total

Review 1.  Cancer stem cell marker glycosylation: Nature, function and significance.

Authors:  Brody W Mallard; Joe Tiralongo
Journal:  Glycoconj J       Date:  2017-06-17       Impact factor: 2.916

Review 2.  Targeting Notch, Hedgehog, and Wnt pathways in cancer stem cells: clinical update.

Authors:  Naoko Takebe; Lucio Miele; Pamela Jo Harris; Woondong Jeong; Hideaki Bando; Michael Kahn; Sherry X Yang; S Percy Ivy
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 66.675

Review 3.  Pro-oncogenic cell signaling machinery as a target for oncolytic viruses.

Authors:  Emma Borrego-Diaz; Rajesh Mathew; Dana Hawkinson; Tuba Esfandyari; Zhengian Liu; Patrick W Lee; Faris Farassati
Journal:  Curr Pharm Biotechnol       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.837

Review 4.  Chemical Proteomic Approaches Targeting Cancer Stem Cells: A Review of Current Literature.

Authors:  Hye Jin Jung
Journal:  Cancer Genomics Proteomics       Date:  2017 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 4.069

Review 5.  ABCG2: a potential marker of stem cells and novel target in stem cell and cancer therapy.

Authors:  Xi-wei Ding; Jun-hua Wu; Chun-ping Jiang
Journal:  Life Sci       Date:  2010-02-14       Impact factor: 5.037

6.  Inhibition of RalA signaling pathway in treatment of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Heather Male; Vijay Patel; Mark A Jacob; Emma Borrego-Diaz; Kun Wang; Derek A Young; Amanda L Wise; Chao Huang; Peter Van Veldhuizen; Amy O'Brien-Ladner; Stephen K Williamson; Sarah A Taylor; Ossama Tawfik; Tuba Esfandyari; Faris Farassati
Journal:  Lung Cancer       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 5.705

7.  Ral overactivation in malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors.

Authors:  Vidya Bodempudi; Farnaz Yamoutpoor; Weihong Pan; Arkadiusz Z Dudek; Tuba Esfandyari; Mark Piedra; Dusica Babovick-Vuksanovic; Richard A Woo; Victor F Mautner; Lan Kluwe; D Wade Clapp; George H De Vries; Stacey L Thomas; Andreas Kurtz; Luis F Parada; Faris Farassati
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2009-05-04       Impact factor: 4.272

8.  Stem cell autocrine CXCL12/CXCR4 stimulates invasion and metastasis of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Xingwei Wang; Yan Cao; Shirong Zhang; Zhihui Chen; Ling Fan; Xiaochun Shen; Shiwen Zhou; Dongfeng Chen
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-05-30

Review 9.  Human cancer stem cells are a target for cancer prevention using (-)-epigallocatechin gallate.

Authors:  Hirota Fujiki; Eisaburo Sueoka; Anchalee Rawangkan; Masami Suganuma
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-09-23       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 10.  Oncolytic Viruses in Cancer Treatment: A Review.

Authors:  Sean E Lawler; Maria-Carmela Speranza; Choi-Fong Cho; E Antonio Chiocca
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 31.777

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Cancer stem cells and tumorigenesis.

Authors:  Pingping Zhu; Zusen Fan
Journal:  Biophys Rep       Date:  2018-08-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.