Literature DB >> 27441411

Oncolytic Viruses in Cancer Treatment: A Review.

Sean E Lawler1, Maria-Carmela Speranza1, Choi-Fong Cho1, E Antonio Chiocca1.   

Abstract

IMPORTANCE: Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are emerging as important agents in cancer treatment. Oncolytic viruses offer the attractive therapeutic combination of tumor-specific cell lysis together with immune stimulation, therefore acting as potential in situ tumor vaccines. Moreover, OVs can be engineered for optimization of tumor selectivity and enhanced immune stimulation and can be readily combined with other agents. The effectiveness of OVs has been demonstrated in many preclinical studies and recently in humans, with US Food and Drug Administration approval of the oncolytic herpesvirus talimogene laherparepvec in advanced melanoma, a major breakthrough for the field. Thus, the OV approach to cancer therapy is becoming more interesting for scientists, clinicians, and the public. The main purpose of this review is to give a basic overview of OVs in clinical development and provide a description of the current status of clinical trials. OBSERVATIONS: In 2016 approximately 40 clinical trials are recruiting patients, using a range of OVs in multiple cancer types. There are also many more trials in the planning stages. Therefore, we are now in the most active period of clinical OV studies in the history of the field. There are several OVs currently being tested with many additional engineered derivatives. In OV clinical trials, there are a number of specific areas that should be considered, including viral pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, potential toxic effects, and monitoring of the patients' immune status. Clinical development of OVs is increasingly focused on their immune stimulatory properties, which may work synergistically with immune checkpoint inhibitors and other strategies in the treatment of human cancer. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Oncolytic viruses are an active area of clinical research. The ability of these agents to harness antitumor immunity appears to be key for their success. Combinatorial studies with immune checkpoint blockade have started and the results are awaited with great interest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 27441411     DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.2064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA Oncol        ISSN: 2374-2437            Impact factor:   31.777


  169 in total

Review 1.  Glioblastoma in adults: a Society for Neuro-Oncology (SNO) and European Society of Neuro-Oncology (EANO) consensus review on current management and future directions.

Authors:  Patrick Y Wen; Michael Weller; Eudocia Quant Lee; Brian M Alexander; Jill S Barnholtz-Sloan; Floris P Barthel; Tracy T Batchelor; Ranjit S Bindra; Susan M Chang; E Antonio Chiocca; Timothy F Cloughesy; John F DeGroot; Evanthia Galanis; Mark R Gilbert; Monika E Hegi; Craig Horbinski; Raymond Y Huang; Andrew B Lassman; Emilie Le Rhun; Michael Lim; Minesh P Mehta; Ingo K Mellinghoff; Giuseppe Minniti; David Nathanson; Michael Platten; Matthias Preusser; Patrick Roth; Marc Sanson; David Schiff; Susan C Short; Martin J B Taphoorn; Joerg-Christian Tonn; Jonathan Tsang; Roel G W Verhaak; Andreas von Deimling; Wolfgang Wick; Gelareh Zadeh; David A Reardon; Kenneth D Aldape; Martin J van den Bent
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2020-08-17       Impact factor: 12.300

2.  Biohybrid Nanosystems for Cancer Treatment: Merging the Best of Two Worlds.

Authors:  Flavia Fontana; Raquél Bartolo; Hélder A Santos
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

Review 3.  Delivery technologies for cancer immunotherapy.

Authors:  Rachel S Riley; Carl H June; Robert Langer; Michael J Mitchell
Journal:  Nat Rev Drug Discov       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 84.694

4.  Oncolytic virotherapy in glioblastoma patients induces a tumor macrophage phenotypic shift leading to an altered glioblastoma microenvironment.

Authors:  Wouter B L van den Bossche; Anne Kleijn; Charlotte E Teunissen; Jane S A Voerman; Cristina Teodosio; David P Noske; Jacques J M van Dongen; Clemens M F Dirven; Martine L M Lamfers
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2018-10-09       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 5.  [Combination of Oncolytic Virotherapy and CAR T/NK Cell Therapy for the Treatment of Cancer].

Authors:  G V Kochneva; G F Sivolobova; A V Tkacheva; A A Gorchakov; S V Kulemzin
Journal:  Mol Biol (Mosk)       Date:  2020 Jan-Feb

Review 6.  Please stand by: how oncolytic viruses impact bystander cells.

Authors:  Leslee Sprague; Lynne Braidwood; Joe Conner; Kevin A Cassady; Fabian Benencia; Timothy P Cripe
Journal:  Future Virol       Date:  2018-08-08       Impact factor: 1.831

Review 7.  Targeting T cell activation in immuno-oncology.

Authors:  S D Saibil; P S Ohashi
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 3.677

8.  Arming oHSV with ULBP3 drives abscopal immunity in lymphocyte-depleted glioblastoma.

Authors:  Hans-Georg Wirsching; Huajia Zhang; Frank Szulzewsky; Sonali Arora; Paola Grandi; Patrick J Cimino; Nduka Amankulor; Jean S Campbell; Lisa McFerrin; Siobhan S Pattwell; Chibawanye Ene; Alexandra Hicks; Michael Ball; James Yan; Jenny Zhang; Debrah Kumasaka; Robert H Pierce; Michael Weller; Mitchell Finer; Christophe Quéva; Joseph C Glorioso; A McGarry Houghton; Eric C Holland
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2019-07-11

9.  TNFa and IL-2 armed adenoviruses enable complete responses by anti-PD-1 checkpoint blockade.

Authors:  V Cervera-Carrascon; M Siurala; J M Santos; R Havunen; S Tähtinen; P Karell; S Sorsa; A Kanerva; A Hemminki
Journal:  Oncoimmunology       Date:  2018-04-09       Impact factor: 8.110

10.  Advances in the mechanisms of action of cancer-targeting oncolytic viruses.

Authors:  Cun-Zhi Lin; Gui-Ling Xiang; Xin-Hong Zhu; Lu-Lu Xiu; Jia-Xing Sun; Xiao-Yuan Zhang
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-01-19       Impact factor: 2.967

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.