Literature DB >> 29375777

A stoichiometric perspective of the effect of herbivore dung on ecosystem functioning.

Judith Sitters1,2,3, Harry Olde Venterink1.   

Abstract

Ungulate herbivores play a prominent role in maintaining the tree-grass balance in n class="Species">African savannas. Their top-down role through selective feeding onpan> either trees or grasses is well studied, but their bottom-up role through depositionpan> of nutrients in dung and urine has been overlooked. Here, we propose a novel conpan>cept of savanna ecosystem functionpan>ing in which the balance between trees and grasses is maintained through stoichiometric differences in dung of herbivores that feed onpan> them. We describe a framework in which N2-fixing trees and grasses, as well as ungulate browsing and grazing herbivores, occupy opposite positions in an interconnected cycle of processes. The framework makes the testable assumption that the differences in dung N:P ratio among browsers and grazers are large enough to influence competitive interactions between N2-fixing trees and grasses. Other key elements of our concept are supported with field data from a Kenyan savanna.

Entities:  

Keywords:  N:P ratio; feces; grazing; nitrogen; phosphorus; plant competition; stoichiometry; tree–grass balance

Year:  2017        PMID: 29375777      PMCID: PMC5773295          DOI: 10.1002/ece3.3666

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Evol        ISSN: 2045-7758            Impact factor:   2.912


Savanna ecosystems are characterized by a mixture of grasses and trees (Scholes & Archer, 1997). In n class="Species">African savannas, the grasses are mainly of the C4‐photosynthetic pathway and many of the trees, such as the abundant Acacia (now sometimes called Vachellia and Senegalia), can symbiotically fix atmospheric n class="Chemical">nitrogen (N). African savannas also support the highest abundance and diversity of extant ungulate herbivores (Du Toit & Cumming, 1999). By feeding selectively on either trees (browsers) or grasses (grazers), these herbivores exert a direct, top‐down influence upon the balance between woody and herbaceous components of savanna vegetation. However, herbivores can also influence the structure of vegetation indirectly, for example, by altering fire frequencies or the competitive interactions between grasses and trees (Augustine & McNaughton, 2004; Du Toit & Cumming, 1999; Holdo, Holt, Coughenour, & Ritchie, 2007; van Langevelde et al., 2003; Riginos & Grace, 2008; Riginos & Young, 2007; Sankaran, Ratnam, & Hanan, 2008; Scholes & Archer, 1997; Staver, Bond, Stock, van Rensburg, & Waldram, 2009). In addition to these top‐down processes, herbivores also affect vegetation by producing dung and urine, which returns nutrients such as n class="Chemical">N and n class="Chemical">phosphorus (P) in a more rapidly available form than through litter decomposition (Bardgett & Wardle, 2003). Indeed, the magnitude of nutrient returns in excreta can be comparable to inputs through wet atmospheric deposition and leaf litter decomposition (Augustine, McNaughton, & Frank, 2003; Cech, Olde Venterink, & Edwards, 2010; Fornara & Du Toit, 2008; Sitters, Edwards, & Olde Venterink, 2013; Sitters, Maechler, Edwards, Suter, & Olde Venterink, 2014; van der Waal et al., 2011). However, little attention has been paid to the fact that different savanna herbivores produce dung containing widely different concentrations of N and P and that these nutrients are released at different rates (Sitters et al., 2014). As these nutrients are often limiting in savanna vegetation (Augustine et al., 2003; Cech, Kuster, Edwards, & Olde Venterink, 2008), such variation in the supply ratios of N to P can influence plant species composition (Olde Venterink & Guesewell, 2010), and we might expect tree–grass interactions to be affected by the types of dung returned to the ecosystem. It appears, however, that this possibility has largely been overlooked. Here, we propose a stoichiometric concept of savanna ecosystem functioning in which N2‐fixing trees and grasses, as well as ungulate browsers and grazers (either wild or domestic), occupy opposite positionpan>s in an interconpan>nected cycle of processes (Figure 1a): N2‐fixing trees produce relatively N‐rich leaves with a high N:P ratio (Figure 1b), and browsers consuming these leaves, for example, giraffe, produce dung with relatively high N:P ratios (Figure 1c). In contrast, C4‐grasses have relatively N‐poor leaves with low N:P ratios (Figure 1b), and grazers consuming this herbage, for example, zebra, produce dung with low N:P ratios (Figure 1c). We make the testable assumption that the differences in dung N:P ratio between browsers and grazers, in combination with differences in dung quantity, are large enough to influence competitive interactions between N2‐fixing trees and grasses, particularly when the trees are still seedlings (Figure 1a). Thus, the pathway of nutrient return through herbivore dung could play an important role in maintaining the tree–grass balance in savannas.
Figure 1

Conceptual framework of African savanna where N2‐fixing trees and grasses, as well as ungulate browsers and grazers, occupy opposite positions in an interconnected cycle of processes (a). Forage (b) and dung samples (c) were collected in a semiarid savanna at the Mpala Research Centre (36°52′E, 0°17′N) in Kenya. Leaves of six individual trees of the N2‐fixing species Acacia (Senegalia) brevispica, A. mellifera, Acacia (Vachellia) drepanolobium, and A. gerrardii were collected, together with leaves of up to 20 individuals of the dominant C4‐grass species Brachiaria lachnantha, Pennisetum mezianum, P. stramineum, and Themeda triandra in January 2016. Additionally, fresh dung of the browser species Guenther's dikdik (n = 6), eland (n = 3), giraffe (n = 5), greater kudu (n = 3) and Thomson's gazelle (n = 6), and the grazer species African buffalo (n = 5), Burchell's zebra (n = 6), Grevy's zebra (n = 2), and common warthog (n = 3) were collected. Forage and dung samples were dried, ground, and analyzed for total N and P concentrations. Classification of a herbivore species as a browser or grazer was based on dung δ13C values, with browsers ranging from −28 to −25 and grazers from −16 to −13, according to (Codron & Codron, 2009; Codron et al., 2007). Comparisons between N2‐fixing trees and C4‐grasses, and between browser and grazer dung, were performed with balanced ANOVA and unbalanced ANOVA, respectively. Panel (d) shows hypothesized effects of dung N:P ratio and dung quantity on the competitive strength of N2‐fixing tree seedlings; that is, biomass when growing in a mixture with C4‐grasses relative to biomass in the absence of the competing grasses (values >1 indicate that tree seedlings are superior competitors and values <1 that grasses are superior)

Conceptual framework of n class="Species">African savanna where N2‐fixing trees and grasses, as well as ungulate browsers and grazers, occupy opposite positions in an interconnected cycle of processes (a). Forage (b) and dung samples (c) were collected in a semiarid savanna at the Mpala Research Centre (36°52′E, 0°17′N) in Kenya. Leaves of six individual trees of the N2‐fixing species Acacia (Senegalia) brevispica, A. mellifera, Acacia (Vachellia) drepanolobium, and A. gerrardii were collected, together with leaves of up to 20 individuals of the dominant C4‐grass species Brachiaria lachnantha, Pennisetum mezianum, P. stramineum, and Themeda triandra in January 2016. Additionally, fresh dung of the browser species Guenther's dikdik (n = 6), eland (n = 3), giraffe (n = 5), greater kudu (n = 3) and Thomson's gazelle (n = 6), and the grazer species African buffalo (n = 5), Burchell's zebra (n = 6), Grevy's zebra (n = 2), and common warthog (n = 3) were collected. Forage and dung samples were dried, ground, and analyzed for total N and P concentrations. Classification of a herbivore species as a browser or grazer was based on dung δ13C values, with browsers ranging from −28 to −25 and grazers from −16 to −13, according to (Codron & Codron, 2009; Codron et al., 2007). Comparisons between N2‐fixing trees and C4‐grasses, and between browser and grazer dung, were performed with balanced ANOVA and unbalanced ANOVA, respectively. Panel (d) shows hypothesized effects of dung N:P ratio and dung quantity on the competitive strength of N2‐fixing tree seedlings; that is, biomass when growing in a mixture with C4‐grasses relative to biomass in the absence of the competing grasses (values >1 indicate that tree seedlings are superior competitors and values <1 that grasses are superior) We hypothesize that a low quantity of dung with a low n class="Chemical">N:P ratio will create n class="Chemical">N‐limited conditions and stimulate symbiotic N2‐fixation by the tree seedlings (Vitousek et al., 2002), giving them a competitive advantage over grasses (Figure 1d). However, with an increase in dung quantity, the absolute amounts of available N and P increase regardless of the dung N:P ratio; under these conditions, we would expect less N2‐fixation, as this process is constrained by high soil N availability (Pons, Perreijn, van Kessel, & Werger, 2007). Under these conditions of high soil N and P availabilities, grasses are likely to become dominant as they generally have higher plant N and P use efficiencies than N2‐fixing tree seedlings (Lambers, Raven, Shaver, & Smith, 2008; Sage & Pearcy, 1987; Tjoelker, Craine, Wedin, Reich, & Tilman, 2005). Dung with a high N:P ratio, regardless of dung quantity, will also stimulate the growth of grasses, because the ability of symbiotic N2‐fixation is no longer decisive under these more P‐limited conditions, while P use efficiency is. This concept, illustrated in Figure 1, provides an innovative perspective not only on the functioning of savanna ecosystems, but on the functioning of grazing ecosystems around the globe, because it links the following “observations” that have not been connected before: (1) Herbivores not only influence vegetation composition through (selective) plant consumption, but also through their dung and urine that serve as natural fertilizers, (2) dung from herbivore species varies considerably in C:N:P stoichiometry because of variationpan> in quality of their diet, and (3) N:P stoichiometry of nutrient supply influences plant species composition. We have supported our concept with data collected in a Kenyan savanna (Figure 1). These data are consistent with n class="Chemical">N:P ratios measured in forage (Augustine et al., 2003; Cech et al., 2008; Craine, Morrow, & Stock, 2008; Ludwig, de Kroonpan>, Prins, & Berendse, 2001; Sitters et al., 2013) and dung in other n class="Species">African savannas (de Iongh et al., 2011; Sitters et al., 2014; van der Waal et al., 2011), although no other study has examined all the elements of Figure 1. Obviously, the impact of N and P availabilities and their stoichiometry on plant species competition in our concept still needs verification, and this article is meant as an encouragement to obtain these data. Previous research on the constraint of woody recruitment in abandoned livestock areas, which exhibit much higher soil N and P availabilities than the surrounding savanna landscape, is in accordance with our concept (Augustine, 2003; van der Waal et al., 2011), as is the prediction that N‐poor environments are more prone to woody encroachment (Kraaij & Ward, 2006). Moreover, at least one study has shown lower competitive suppression of N2‐fixing seedlings by grasses under low soil N:P ratios (Cramer, van Cauter, & Bond, 2010). We also have experimental evidence that variation in mineral N:P supply is a potential driver of competitive exclusion among dominant plant species (Olde Venterink & Guesewell, 2010) and that dung of different European herbivores impacted the composition and diversity of an experimental plant community (Valdés Correcher, Sitters and Olde Venterink, unpublished data). It is important to note that the supply ratio of n class="Chemical">N:P might onpan>ly have an effect onpan> tree–grass interactionpan>s in savanna when water availability is not limiting plant growth, because drought might override the n class="Chemical">N:P effect on tree–grass competition (Scholes & Archer, 1997). Also, the functional variability in life stages of grasses and particularly trees may influence the processes presented in Figure 1. For instance, seedlings of N2‐fixing species will be more affected by competition from C4‐grasses than mature trees under “high absolute levels of N and P” and/or “high N:P conditions,” because roots of adult trees may explore deeper soil P pools than the seedlings or the grasses (Holdo & Nippert, 2015). The concept described here may have a stabilizing effect on the long‐term functioning of savanna ecosystems. Variation in herbivore dung stoichiometry can stimulate a patchy landscape, whereby a patch occupied by trees will subsequently become a grassland patch, and vice versa. This would imply that soil conditions remain spatially uniform in the long term; that is, there is no tendency for tree‐dominated areas to become progressively enriched with n class="Chemical">N or grass‐dominated areas to become depleted, as previously described (Cech et al., 2008).

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

n class="Chemical">Nonpan>e declared.
  9 in total

1.  Positive and negative effects of grass, cattle, and wild herbivores on Acacia saplings in an East African savanna.

Authors:  Corinna Riginos; Truman P Young
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 2.  Plant nutrient-acquisition strategies change with soil age.

Authors:  Hans Lambers; John A Raven; Gaius R Shaver; Sally E Smith
Journal:  Trends Ecol Evol       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 17.712

3.  Savanna tree density, herbivores, and the herbaceous community: bottom-up vs. top-down effects.

Authors:  Corinna Riginos; James B Grace
Journal:  Ecology       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 5.499

4.  Symbiotic nitrogen fixation in a tropical rainforest: 15N natural abundance measurements supported by experimental isotopic enrichment.

Authors:  Thijs L Pons; Kristel Perreijn; Chris van Kessel; Marinus J A Werger
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 10.151

5.  Browsing and fire interact to suppress tree density in an African savanna.

Authors:  A Carla Staver; William J Bond; William D Stock; Sue J Van Rensburg; Matthew S Waldram
Journal:  Ecol Appl       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.657

6.  Large herbivores may alter vegetation structure of semi-arid savannas through soil nutrient mediation.

Authors:  Cornelis van der Waal; Ada Kool; Seline S Meijer; Edward Kohi; Ignas M A Heitkönig; Willem F de Boer; Frank van Langevelde; Rina C Grant; Mike J S Peel; Rob Slotow; Henrik J de Knegt; Herbert H T Prins; Hans de Kroon
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Linking leaf and root trait syndromes among 39 grassland and savannah species.

Authors:  M G Tjoelker; J M Craine; D Wedin; P B Reich; D Tilman
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 10.151

8.  The Nitrogen Use Efficiency of C(3) and C(4) Plants: II. Leaf Nitrogen Effects on the Gas Exchange Characteristics of Chenopodium album (L.) and Amaranthus retroflexus (L.).

Authors:  R F Sage; R W Pearcy
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 8.340

9.  Nutrient concentration ratios and co-limitation in South African grasslands.

Authors:  Joseph M Craine; Carl Morrow; William D Stock
Journal:  New Phytol       Date:  2008-06-05       Impact factor: 10.151

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Body size-fecal nutrient patterns of mammalian herbivores.

Authors:  Judith Sitters; Harry Olde Venterink
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-02-09       Impact factor: 11.205

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.