In savannas, the tree-grass balance is governed by water, nutrients, fire and herbivory, and their interactions. We studied the hypothesis that herbivores indirectly affect vegetation structure by changing the availability of soil nutrients, which, in turn, alters the competition between trees and grasses. Nine abandoned livestock holding-pen areas (kraals), enriched by dung and urine, were contrasted with nearby control sites in a semi-arid savanna. About 40 years after abandonment, kraal sites still showed high soil concentrations of inorganic N, extractable P, K, Ca and Mg compared to controls. Kraals also had a high plant production potential and offered high quality forage. The intense grazing and high herbivore dung and urine deposition rates in kraals fit the accelerated nutrient cycling model described for fertile systems elsewhere. Data of a concurrent experiment also showed that bush-cleared patches resulted in an increase in impala dung deposition, probably because impala preferred open sites to avoid predation. Kraal sites had very low tree densities compared to control sites, thus the high impala dung deposition rates here may be in part driven by the open structure of kraal sites, which may explain the persistence of nutrients in kraals. Experiments indicated that tree seedlings were increasingly constrained when competing with grasses under fertile conditions, which might explain the low tree recruitment observed in kraals. In conclusion, large herbivores may indirectly keep existing nutrient hotspots such as abandoned kraals structurally open by maintaining a high local soil fertility, which, in turn, constrains woody recruitment in a negative feedback loop. The maintenance of nutrient hotspots such as abandoned kraals by herbivores contributes to the structural heterogeneity of nutrient-poor savanna vegetation.
In savannas, the tree-grass bn class="Chemical">alanpan>ce is governed by pan> class="Chemical">water, nutrients, fire and herbivory, and their interactions. We studied the hypothesis that herbivores indirectly affect vegetation structure by changing the availability of soil nutrients, which, in turn, alters the competition between trees and grasses. Nine abandoned livestock holding-pen areas (kraals), enriched by dung and urine, were contrasted with nearby control sites in a semi-arid savanna. About 40 years after abandonment, kraal sites still showed high soil concentrations of inorganic N, extractable P, K, Ca and Mg compared to controls. Kraals also had a high plant production potential and offered high quality forage. The intense grazing and high herbivore dung and urine deposition rates in kraals fit the accelerated nutrient cycling model described for fertile systems elsewhere. Data of a concurrent experiment also showed that bush-cleared patches resulted in an increase in impala dung deposition, probably becauseimpala preferred open sites to avoid predation. Kraal sites had very low tree densities compared to control sites, thus the high impala dung deposition rates here may be in part driven by the open structure of kraal sites, which may explain the persistence of nutrients in kraals. Experiments indicated that tree seedlings were increasingly constrained when competing with grasses under fertile conditions, which might explain the low tree recruitment observed in kraals. In conclusion, large herbivores may indirectly keep existing nutrient hotspots such as abandoned kraals structurally open by maintaining a high local soil fertility, which, in turn, constrains woody recruitment in a negative feedback loop. The maintenance of nutrient hotspots such as abandoned kraals by herbivores contributes to the structural heterogeneity of nutrient-poor savanna vegetation.
Authors: Mahesh Sankaran; Niall P Hanan; Robert J Scholes; Jayashree Ratnam; David J Augustine; Brian S Cade; Jacques Gignoux; Steven I Higgins; Xavier Le Roux; Fulco Ludwig; Jonas Ardo; Feetham Banyikwa; Andries Bronn; Gabriela Bucini; Kelly K Caylor; Michael B Coughenour; Alioune Diouf; Wellington Ekaya; Christie J Feral; Edmund C February; Peter G H Frost; Pierre Hiernaux; Halszka Hrabar; Kristine L Metzger; Herbert H T Prins; Susan Ringrose; William Sea; Jörg Tews; Jeff Worden; Nick Zambatis Journal: Nature Date: 2005-12-08 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: M Valeix; A J Loveridge; S Chamaillé-Jammes; Z Davidson; F Murindagomo; H Fritz; D W Macdonald Journal: Ecology Date: 2009-01 Impact factor: 5.499
Authors: Daniel Osieko Okach; Joseph O Ondier; Gerhard Rambold; John Tenhunen; Bernd Huwe; Eun Young Jung; Dennis O Otieno Journal: J Plant Res Date: 2019-04-12 Impact factor: 2.629
Authors: Carla L Atkinson; Halvor M Halvorson; Kevin A Kuehn; Monica Winebarger; Ansley Hamid; Matthew N Waters Journal: Oecologia Date: 2021-01-02 Impact factor: 3.225
Authors: Joris P G M Cromsigt; Mariska Te Beest; Graham I H Kerley; Marietjie Landman; Elizabeth le Roux; Felisa A Smith Journal: Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci Date: 2018-10-22 Impact factor: 6.671
Authors: Eduardo R M Barbosa; Kyle W Tomlinson; Luísa G Carvalheiro; Kevin Kirkman; Steven de Bie; Herbert H T Prins; Frank van Langevelde Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-03-25 Impact factor: 3.240