| Literature DB >> 29375677 |
Yichi Xu1,2, Haoye Meng1,2,3, Heyong Yin1,2, Zhen Sun1,2, Jiang Peng1,2, Xiaolong Xu1,2, Quanyi Guo1,2, Wenjing Xu1,2, Xiaoming Yu1,2, Zhiguo Yuan1,2, Bo Xiao1,2, Cheng Wang1,2, Yu Wang1,2, Shuyun Liu1,2, Shibi Lu1,2, Zhaoxu Wang4, Aiyuan Wang1,2.
Abstract
Degradation limits <span class="Chemical">the application of <span class="Chemical">magnesium alloys, and evaluation methods for non-traumatic in vivo quantification of implant degradation and bone formation are imperfect. In the present study, a micro-arc-oxidized AZ31 magnesium alloy was used to evaluate the degradation of implants and new bone formation in 60 male New Zealand white rabbits. Degradation was monitored by weighing the implants prior to and following implantation, and by performing micro-computed tomography (CT) scans and histological analysis after 1, 4, 12, 24, 36, and 48 weeks of implantation. The results indicated that the implants underwent slow degradation in the first 4 weeks, with negligible degradation in the first week, followed by significantly increased degradation during weeks 12-24 (P<0.05), and continued degradation until the end of the 48-week experimental period. The magnesium content decreased as the implant degraded (P<0.05); however, the density of the material exhibited almost no change. Micro-CT results also demonstrated that pin volume, pin mineral density, mean 'pin thickness', bone surface/bone volume and trabecular separation decreased over time (P<0.05), and that the pin surface area/pin volume, bone volume fraction, trabecular thickness, trabecular number and tissue mineral density increased over time (P<0.05), indicating that the number of bones and density of new bone increased as magnesium degraded. These results support the positive effect of magnesium on osteogenesis. However, from the maximum inner diameter of the new bone loop and diameter of the pin in the same position, the magnesium alloy was not capable of creating sufficient bridges between the bones and biomaterials when there were preexisting gaps. Histological analyses indicated that there were no inflammatory responses around the implants. The results of the present study indicate that a micro-arc-oxidized AZ31 magnesium alloy is safe in vivo and efficiently degraded. Furthermore, the novel bone formation increased as the implant degraded. The findings concluded that micro-CT, which is useful for providing non-traumatic, in vivo, quantitative and precise data, has great value for exploring the degradation of implants and novel bone formation.Entities:
Keywords: bone formation; degradation; in vivo; magnesium alloy; micro-computed tomography
Year: 2017 PMID: 29375677 PMCID: PMC5766073 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2017.5389
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Figure 1.Micro-computed tomography images and 3D reconstruction of the femoral condyle. (A) 3D reconstruction of the femoral condyle and (B) longitudinal section in the 3D coordinate. (C) ROI (diameter=2.0 and length=6.0 mm) and (D) highlight of ROI of the magnesium-alloy pin. (E) New ROI (diameter=2.5 and length=6.5 mm) and (F) highlight of ROI of bone formation around the pin after blanking the previous ROI. ROI, region of interest.
Figure 2.In vivo weight loss of implanted AZ31 pins during the study period. *P<0.05 vs. prior to implantation.
Figure 3.Region of interest and degradation of the magnesium alloy pins at (A) 1, (B) 4, (C) 12, (D) 24, (E) 36 and (F) 48 weeks. The pins degraded over time at different rates over the course of the experiment. Red arrows indicate corrosion pitting. Yellow arrows indicated hydrogen gas.
Figure 4.In vivo degradation of implanted AZ31 pins during the study period, assessed via micro-CT measurements. (A) Pin volume fraction. (B) Alloy cylinder mineral density and CT image density. (C) Ratio of the surface area and volume. (D) Mean thickness of the pin. CT, computed tomography. *P<0.05 vs. prior to implantation.
Figure 5.Weight fraction and volume fraction of the AZ31 magnesium alloy pins. *P<0.05 vs. prior to implantation.
Figure 6.After blanking the previous ROI, a new larger ROI was selected (diameter=2.5 and length=6.5 mm) in the same shape and same position to observe new bone formation and assess the stimulatory effects of magnesium alloy on the growth of new bone tissue. New bone formed over time at different rates throughout the experiment. Representative micro-computed tomography images from (A) 1, (B) 4, (C) 12, (D) 24, (E) 36 and (F) 48 weeks are shown. Yellow arrows indicate new bone.
Figure 7.In vivo bone formation around the pins during the study period, assessed via micro-CT measurements. (A) BVF, (B) BS/BV. (C) Calib. Tb.Th., (D) Calib. Tb.Sp., (E) Tb.N and (F) TMD of new bone. *P<0.05 vs. prior to implantation. BVF, bone volume fraction; BS/BV, bone surface/bone volume; Calib, calibrated; Tb., trabecular; Th., thickness; Sp., separation; N., number; TMD, tissue mineral density.
Figure 8.Micro-computed tomography images of the cross-section of the magnesium pin (week 36). (A) Maximum inner diameter of the new bone loop (orange line, 2.34 mm) and (B) Diameter of the pin (orange line, 1.94 mm) at the same position. Red arrows indicate the magnesium-alloy pin and the yellow arrow indicates bone formation around the pin.
Figure 9.Maximum inner diameter of the new bone loop and diameter of the pin at the same position at each time point.
Figure 10.Pin volume fraction and bone volume fraction. At the end of the study, there was no intersection of the two curves.
Figure 11.Hematoxylin and eosin staining of the tissue surrounding the pin. (A) The hole in the middle represents the position of the pin (at 24 weeks). Tissue samples from (B) 4, (C) 24 and (D) 48 weeks.