| Literature DB >> 29375648 |
Julio V Schneider1,2, Renate Rabenstein3, Jens Wesenberg4, Karsten Wesche4,5,6, Georg Zizka1,2, Jörg Habersetzer3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Leaf venation traits are important for many research fields such as systematics and evolutionary biology, plant physiology, climate change, and paleoecology. In spite of an increasing demand for vein trait data, studies are often still data-limited because the development of methods that allow rapid generation of large sets of vein data has lagged behind. Recently, non-destructive X-ray technology has proven useful as an alternative to traditional slow and destructive chemical-based methods. Non-destructive techniques more readily allow the use of herbarium specimens, which provide an invaluable but underexploited resource of vein data and related environmental information. The utility of 2D X-ray technology and microfocus X-ray computed tomography, however, has been compromised by insufficient image resolution. Here, we advanced X-ray technology by increasing image resolution and throughput without the application of contrast agents.Entities:
Keywords: Contact microradiography; Image processing; Leaf clearing; Micro CT; Vein density; Vein networks
Year: 2018 PMID: 29375648 PMCID: PMC5774031 DOI: 10.1186/s13007-018-0274-y
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Plant Methods ISSN: 1746-4811 Impact factor: 4.993
Voucher information and differences in the resolution of leaf veins as assessed from vein density (VLA) calculations based on two different 2D X-ray image plate resolutions, the industrial standard (25 µm) compared with our new project standard (7 µm) as well as micro CT (CT)
| Taxon | Collector and collection no. (herbarium acronym) | 2D X-ray: 25 µm versus 7 µm | CT versus 2D X-ray (7 µm) | CT image with full vein resolution | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean VLA (mm mm−2) 25/7 µm | % similarity in VLA calculations | Mean VLA (mm mm−2) 7 µm/CT | % similarity in VLA calculations | |||
| Bisse 27767 (FR) | 1.98/1.98 | 100.0 | 1.98/1.98 | 100.0 | Yes | |
| Höhn 19 (FR) | 5.26/6.85 | 76.8*** | 6.85/11.5 | 59.6*** | Yes | |
| Kahlheber 497 (FR) | 3.99/4.43 | 90.1 | 4.43/4.93 | 89.9 | Yesb | |
| Zwarg 81 (FR) | 6.35/7.69 | 82.6*** | 7.07/8.16 | 86.7*** | Yes | |
| Kéré 822 (FR) | 2.88/3.41 | 84.5* | 3.41/8.31 | 41.1*** | Yesb | |
| Küppers 636 (FR) | 4.02/5.20 | 77.3*** | 5.20/6.66 | 78.1*** | Yes | |
| Fuchs 21192 (L) | 1.64/1.68 | 97.6 | 1.68/7.27 | 23.1*** | Yes | |
| Schneider 1 (FR) | n.d.a | n.d.a | n.d.a | n.d.a | Yes | |
| Bissiengou 1275 (WAG) | 3.48/4.20 | 82.8* | 4.21/8.79 | 47.9*** | Yes | |
| Neumann 1530 (FR) | 2.41/2.75 | 87.6* | 2.75/4.76 | 57.8*** | Yesb | |
| Schneider 2842 (FR) | 0.87/0.87 | 100.0 | 0.87/1.35 | 64.4*** | Noc | |
| Neumann 923 (FR) | 3.35/5.48 | 61.2*** | 5.58/13.28 | 41.24*** | Yes | |
| Benavides SP13_QUFA46 | 3.53/4.67 | 75.4*** | 4.67/8.06 | 58.0*** | Yes | |
| Hijmans 424 (L) | 2.95/5.36 | 55.1*** | 5.36/7.62 | 70.3*** | Yes | |
| Benavides RO025 | 3.96/4.38 | 90.5 | na | na | na | |
| Küppers 1951 (FR) | 2.86/3.30 | 86.9* | na | na | na | |
| Kahlheber 262 (FR) | 4.26/5.68 | 75.0*** | na | na | na | |
| Benavides FIN03 | 3.54/4.45 | 79.5** | na | na | na | |
| Schultka 147 (FR) | 3.11/3.65 | 85.2 | na | na | na | |
| Hahn 978 (FR) | 4.72/7.41 | 63.7*** | na | na | na | |
| Kahlheber 925 (FR) | 1.65/2.38 | 69.2*** | na | na | na | |
| Hahn-Hadjali 1206 (FR) | 2.92/3.91 | 74.8*** | na | na | na | |
| Schneider 3027 (FR) | 4.61/7.37 | 62.5*** | na | na | na | |
| Küppers 796 (FR) | 4.48/5.36 | 83.7*** | na | na | na | |
| Küppers 2131 (FR) | 3.49/4.41 | 79.2*** | na | na | na | |
| Uribe 2700 (U) | 8.51/10.72d | 79.4*** | na | na | na | |
| Neumann 738 (FR) | 4.35/4.55 | 95.5 | na | na | na | |
| Leonard 1089 (FR) | 1.98/2.71 | 73.3* | na | na | na | |
| Friedmann 4444b (FR) | 5.09/5.54d | 91.8** | na | na | na | |
| Schneider 1238 (FR) | 5.16/5.61 | 92.0** | na | na | na | |
| Jansen-Jacobs 1895 (U) | 4.21/6.25 | 67.3*** | na | na | na | |
| Seele 736 (LZ) | 2.29/3.17 | 72.4*** | na | na | na | |
| Schmidt 892 (FR) | 3.03/3.57 | 85.1* | na | na | na | |
*Differences significant at p < 0.05/2, ** 0.01/2 or *** 0.001/2 level (after Bonferroni correction)
aThe structure of the very dense, parallel last order veins was not high enough in 2D X-ray images for vein density measurement
bSome last order veins with low contrast
cHighest order veins not distinct
dThe 7 µm images provide full resolution of the leaf venation (as identified by comparison with cleared leaf images)
Fig. 1Tubular sample device used for imaging multiple leaf samples (here, circular sections) in a single micro CT scan
Fig. 2Image processing workflow for 2D X-ray images of leaf venation
Fig. 32D contact microradiography images of the leaf venation of Bridelia ferruginea: a comparison of the effect of 25 µm versus 7 µm resolution. a leaf venation at 25 µm resolution (rectangle indicates enlarged section shown in C). b leaf venation at 7 µm resolution (rectangle indicates enlarged section shown in d). Scale bars 5 mm (a, b) or 0.5 mm (c, d)
Fig. 42D contact microradiography images (7 µm resolution) of selected leaf venation samples with full resolution of the vein networks. a Elvasia calophyllea: inset panel with details. b Medusagyne oppositifolia: inset panel with details. c Anemia abbottii. d Godoya antioquiensis: inset boxes show enlarged details together with identical or similar leaf sections of cleared leaf images (bottom or right side) for the assessment of maximum vein resolution. All images at same scale (scale bar 5 mm); scale bar of inset images, 1 mm
Fig. 5Very high-resolution imaging (virtual 2D) of leaf venation using micro CT. a Micro CT image of a leaf fragment of Burkea africana (Fabaceae); the circle refers to the enlarged view in b. b Detail of leaf venation with full resolution of minor veins. c leaf venation image from chemical leaf clearing; here, the same area as in b is shown. d image from 2D X-ray with 7 µm resolution. Scale 1 mm (a) or 0.5 mm (b–d)
Fig. 6Enlarged sections of very high-resolution imaging (virtual 2D) of fully resolved leaf venation using micro CT. a Bobgunnia madagascariensis. b Froesia venezuelensis. c Ochna afzelii. d Quercus faginea. e Euthemis leucocarpa with crystals along secondary veins (arrow; light structures). Scale bar 1 mm (a–d at same scale)
Fig. 7Comparison of 3D and virtual 2D µCT (a–d) with 2D contact microradiography images (e–h) of Quercus faginea (Fagaceae) and the influence of different image plate resolutions and processing standards, all shown as X-ray negatives. a Penultimate step of the 3D data processing, in which non-target voxels, the epidermis and approximately 50% of the mesophyll tissue were removed during segmentation (modus: “Volume renderer Phong” with slight Erode-settings). The leaf venation was only eroded in the outermost layer but generally difficult to differentiate from surrounding parenchyma. This is due to the volume rendering procedure, which always represents rendering of surfaces. Thus, thickness information by density signals is lost. b Penultimate step of the 3D µCT image processing as a virtual 2D X-ray image (2D mode: “Sum along Ray” or—if more appropriate—“Maximum Projection”). The density values added up along a line of vision through the selected sub-volume showing that the highest vein orders are easier to discern from the surrounding parenchyma than in the 3D model due to particular density differences. c Final step of the 3D µCT image as a surface model (viewed from abaxial leaf surface). The skeletonization of the leaf venation is maximized by increasing the erosion with a slightly higher threshold. Part of the parenchyma is still visible and cannot be further faded out without impairing vein connectivity. d Final step of the 3D µCT image in virtual 2D X-ray mode. This step consists in the individually adjusted increase in contrast of the lower density values (dark tones) at the cost of a loss in contrast in the higher density values (light tones). The non-veinous mesophyll exhibits low density values (except for some granular structures) that are not confluent with the veins. Therefore, a high contrast of the leaf venation up to the highest vein orders is achieved. This processing mode is used subsequently as the reference µCT image. e Individual adjustment of the 2D X-ray image (20 µm) with better contrast and lower artificial widening (dilatation) of the veins compared to the standard protocol. f Individual adjustment of the 2D X-ray image (7 µm resolution). The increased resolution of the vein network compared to the industrial standard image is evident. Linear artefacts are visible which can be easily discerned from the veins. g Industrial standard (25 µm resolution) 2D X-ray image with simple contrasting according to our standard protocol. h Image processing of the 7 µm project standard (2D X-ray) according to our standard protocol. Leaf fragment 1 cm wide