| Literature DB >> 29375510 |
María A Domínguez-Martín1, Antonio López-Lozano1, Rafael Clavería-Gimeno2,3,4, Adrián Velázquez-Campoy2,3,5,6, Gerald Seidel7, Andreas Burkovski7, Jesús Díez1, José M García-Fernández1.
Abstract
Previous studies showed differences in the regulatory response to C/N balance in Prochlorococcus with respect to other cyanobacteria, but no information was available about its causes, or the ecological advantages conferred to thrive in oligotrophic environments. We addressed the changes in key enzymes (Entities:
Keywords: 2-oxoglutarate; C/N balance; Prochlorococcus; cyanobacteria; streamlined regulation
Year: 2018 PMID: 29375510 PMCID: PMC5767323 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2017.02641
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Wild-type and mutated oligonucleotides corresponding to the promoter of the glnA gene in Prochlorococcus sp. strains MIT9313, SS120, and MED4.
| TAGAAG | Forward | ITC, SPR, EMSA |
| CTTTTTGTAGCAACAGGTACCTTCTA | Reverse | ITC, SPR, EMSA |
| TAGAAG | Forward | ITC, SPR, EMSA |
| CTTTTTTGCGGATCCTTTCTCTTCTA | Reverse | ITC, SPR, EMSA |
| CCAATA | Forward | ITC, SPR, EMSA |
| CAATAAGTACTTTTTGTGACTATTGG | Reverse | ITC, SPR, EMSA |
| CCAATA | Forward | ITC, SPR, EMSA |
| CAATAATGCCGTGTGGGGCTTATTGG | Reverse | ITC, SPR, EMSA |
| AAAAA | Forward | ITC |
| ATTATGTATCAAAGGTAACTTTTT | Reverse | ITC |
| AAAAA | Forward | ITC |
| ATTATCAGTCAAAGGTTAGTTTTT | Reverse | ITC |
The DNA fragments are shown with the nucleotides subjected to mutations, listing the function for each DNA fragment and the technique where they have been used. Red: Binding site conserved (wild-type)/Blue: Binding site conserved mutated.
Figure 1Effect of different concentration of azaserine on GS activity (A) and GS protein concentration (B) in different strains from Prochlorococcus. The different concentrations of azaserine were added to the cultures and cells were collected after 24 h of treatment. (A) is a representation of three independent biological replicates of each strain. Error bars correspond to standard deviation. (B) corresponds to a Western blotting using anti-GS antibodies.
Figure 2Effect of different concentration of azaserine on ICDH activity (A) and ICDH protein concentration (B) in different strains of Prochlorococcus. The different concentrations of azaserine were added to the cultures and cells were collected after 24 h of treatment. (A) is a representation of three independent biological replicates of each strain. Error bars correspond to standard deviation. (B) corresponds to a Western blotting using anti-ICDH antibodies.
Figure 3Effect of different concentration of azaserine on ntcA expression in different strains of Prochlorococcus. The different concentrations of azaserine were added to cultures. Samples were collected after 24 h, and gene expression was measured by qRT-PCR. Data are the average of four independent biological replicates. Error bars correspond to standard deviation.
Figure 4Isothermal titration calorimetry study of the NtcA-PglnA interaction in the Prochlorococcus MED4, MIT9313 and SS120 strains. Apparent dissociation constant () of the interaction of NtcA with the wild-type glnA promoter DNA was determined in the presence of different concentrations of 2OG. Further details are shown in Table 2.
Isothermal titration calorimetry parameters of the NtcA—glnA promoter interaction in Prochlorococcus MIT9313, SS120, and MED4.
| MIT9313 | DNA1 | 0.97 ± 0.09 | 19 ± 2 | 17 ± 2 | 0.06 ± 0.01 | 1.1 ± 0.2 |
| DNA2 | 2.1 ± 0.2 | – | (1) | – | – | |
| SS120 | DNA3 | 6.7 ± 0.7 | 42 ± 3 | 8.4 ± 0.7 | 0.80 ± 0.2 | 5.0 ± 0.9 |
| DNA4 | 10 ± 2 | – | (1) | – | – | |
| MED4 | DNA5 | 4.8 ± 0.4 | 36 ± 3 | 9.3 ± 0.8 | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 3.9 ± 0.7 |
| DNA6 | 9.5 ± 0.9 | – | (1) | – | – |
Technical explanations for the meaning of the different constants are described in Materials and Methods. DNA1, DNA3, and DNA5 are DNA fragments including the glnA promoter for the MIT9313, SS120, and MED4 strains, respectively. DNA2, DNA4 and DNA6 are mutated versions of the same fragments where the NtcA binding site is missing. In the case of mutant dsDNA (DNA2, DNA4, and DNA6), K.
Figure 5SPR analysis of the interaction between NtcA(His)6 and the promoter for glnA in Prochlorococcus sp. SS120 and MIT9313. This sensorgram shows the interaction of 1 μM of NtcA(His)6 with wild-type glnA promoter DNA and a rising concentration of 2OG. Relative units show the signal difference from FC2 (glnA) and an unspecific oligonucleotide coupled to the reference cell FC1. 1 μM NtcA was used in all assays, in the presence of 1 mM (green), 5 mM (pink), and 10 mM (red) 2OG.
Figure 6EMSA analysis of the specific binding of NtcA to the glnA promoter of Prochlorococcus sp. MIT9313 (A,B) and SS120 (C,D). (A,C) The binding of 1 μM NtcA to the wild-type glnA promoter DNA was examined by EMSA analysis in the presence of the indicated concentrations of 2OG. (B,D) The binding of 1 μM NtcA in the presence of the indicated concentrations of 2OG to mutated glnA promoter. The samples had the following composition: Lane 1, glnA-promoter; lane 2, glnA-promoter + NtcA (1 μM); lane 3, glnA-promoter + NtcA (1 μM) + 2OG (1 mM); lane 4, glnA-promoter + NtcA (1 μM) + 2OG (5 mM); lane 5, glnA-promoter + NtcA (1 μM) + 2OG (10 mM).
Figure 7Phylogenetic tree based on cyanobacterial NtcA sequences. Molecular phylogenetic analysis by Maximum Likelihood method. The evolutionary history was inferred by using the Maximum Likelihood method based on the Whelan and Goldman model (Whelan and Goldman, 2001). The tree with the highest log likelihood (−3239.73) is shown. Initial tree(s) for the heuristic search were obtained automatically by applying Neighbor-Join and BioNJ algorithms to a matrix of pairwise distances estimated using a JTT model, and then selecting the topology with superior log likelihood value. Circle sizes correspond to bootstrap value (only values higher than 0.75 are shown). The analysis involved 67 amino acid sequences. All positions containing gaps and missing data were eliminated. There were a total of 210 positions in the final dataset. Evolutionary analyses were conducted in MEGA7 (Kumar et al., 2016), and the tree edited with iTOL (Letunic and Bork, 2016).