Literature DB >> 29375118

Comparison of Swirl Sign and Black Hole Sign in Predicting Early Hematoma Growth in Patients with Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Xin Xiong1,2, Qi Li1, Wen-Song Yang3, Xiao Wei4, Xi Hu5, Xing-Chen Wang1, Dan Zhu1, Rui Li1, Du Cao1, Peng Xie1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND Early hematoma growth is associated with poor outcome in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). The swirl sign (SS) and the black hole sign (BHS) are imaging markers in ICH patients. The aim of this study was to compare the predictive value of these 2 signs for early hematoma growth. MATERIAL AND METHODS ICH patients were screened for the appearance of the 2 signs within 6 h after onset of symptoms. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the 2 signs in predicting early hematoma growth were assessed. The accuracy of the 2 signs in predicting early hematoma growth was analyzed by receiver-operator analysis. RESULTS A total of 200 patients were enrolled in this study. BHS was found in 30 (15%) patients, and SS was found in 70 (35%) patients. Of the 71 patients with early hematoma growth, BHS was found on initial computed tomography scans in 24 (33.8%) and SS in 33 (46.5%). The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of BHS for predicting early hematoma growth were 33.8%, 95.3%, 80.0%, and 72.0%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of SS were 46.5%, 71.3%, 47.0%, and 71.0%, respectively. The area under the curve was 0.646 for BHS and 0.589 for SS (P=0.08). Multivariate logistic regression showed that presence of BHS is an independent predictor of early hematoma growth. CONCLUSIONS The Black hole sign seems to be good predictor for hematoma growth. The presence of swirl sign on admission CT does not independently predict hematoma growth in patients with ICH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29375118      PMCID: PMC5800320          DOI: 10.12659/msm.906708

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Monit        ISSN: 1234-1010


Background

Spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) is an acute neurological emergency associated with high morbidity and mortality [1,2]. It is estimated to account for approximately 10% to 20% of all strokes [3]. Early hematoma growth, which occurs in 1/3 of patients when scanned within 6 h, is one of the most important determinants of mortality and functional outcome [4,5]. The restricting early hematoma growth may be useful [6]. The computed tomographic angiography (CTA) spot sign (and derived spot sign score) is a reliable sign for predication of early hematoma growth, early mortality, and poor outcome [7,8]. However, early CTA examination is not available in all clinical settings. In addition, several renal function impairment and allergic reactions to contrast medium restrict the CTA examination. In recent years, noncontrast computed tomography (NCCT) imaging markers, such as blend sign [9], black hole sign (BHS) [10], and hypodensities [11], have been identified as promising imaging markers for predicting early hematoma growth. The swirl sign (SS), which was originally described as areas of low attenuation or radiolucency within hyperattenuated hematomas, indicates active bleeding in epidural hematoma patient [12]. In a study of 203 patients with acute ICH, Selariu et al. documented that SS is an independent predictor of death at 1 month and functional outcome at 3 months [13]. However, the ability of swirl sign to predict early hematoma growth remains controversial. In 2016, Li et al. first proposed using the black hole sign to predict early hematoma growth [10]. More recently, Yu et al. validated the predictive value of BHS in predicting early hematoma growth [14], but the predictive values of BHS and SS in predicting early hematoma growth have never been compared. Therefore, we performed the present study to investigate the role of BHS and SS in predicting early hematoma growth.

Material and Methods

Patients

We analyzed patients with spontaneous ICH aged >18 years who were admitted to our hospital between July 2011 and October 2015 from our prospective ongoing database. The inclusion criteria of this study were as follows: (1) ICH was confirmed on NCCT scan within 6 h after onset of symptoms; (2) the follow-up CT scan was obtained within 24 h after the initial CT scan. The exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients suffered from brain tumor, head trauma, or arteriovenous malformation, rupture of an intracranial aneurysm, hemorrhagic infarction, or primary intraventricular hemorrhage; (2) anticoagulation-associated bleeding; (3) surgical evacuation of hematoma before the follow- up CT scan. The demographical data, previous medical history, cigarette smoking, alcohol consumption, medication history, Glasgow coma scale, and blood pressure were recorded. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University. Written informed consult was obtained from all participants or their relatives.

Imaging analysis

The initial and follow-up CT scans were performed using standard clinical parameters with axial 5-mm section thickness. The images were obtained and stored for further evaluation. Hematoma was assessed and classified as lobar, deep, and infratentorial. According to previous definition, the swirl sign on the NCCT was defined as follows: (1) a hypo- or iso-attenuation region (compared to the attenuation of brain parenchyma) within the hyperattenuation hematoma; (2) shape may be rounded, streak-like, or irregular [13]. The black hole sign on the NCCT was defined as follows: (1) a hypoattenuation area (black hole) encapsulated within the hyperattenuation hematoma; (2) the black hole could be round, oval, or rodlike, but was not connected to the adjacent brain tissue; (3) the black hole should have a clear border; (4) the hematoma should have at least a 28 Hounsfield unit (HU) difference between the 2 density regions [10].Two experienced readers who were blinded to all clinical data and follow-up CT images independently evaluated the presence of SS and BHS on initial CT images in all patients. Discrepancies in judging the occurrence of SS and BHS were settled by joint discussion of the 2 readers. Early hematoma growth was defined as an increase of hematoma volume >33% or absolute hematoma growth >6 mL from initial CT scan [15]. The hematoma volume was measured by abc/2 formula [16]. Illustrative SS and BHS on initial CT images and follow-up images are shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1

Illustration of swirl sign, black hole sign, and follow-up CT images. (A) A 60-year-old man presented with sudden onset of left-sided paralysis. Admission CT image performed 1 h after onset of symptoms showing thalamic ICH with a swirl sign (arrow) and the hematoma volume was 16.57 ml. (B) Hematoma volume remains the same on follow-up CT scan performed 23 h after onset of symptoms. (C) A 75-year-old man with left deep ICH. Initial CT image performed 2 h after onset of symptoms shows black hole sign (arrow). (D) Follow-up CT image 4 h later shows significant hematoma growth.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed with commercially available software, SPSS version 19.0 (SPSS, Inc). Continuous variables are expressed as mean (SD) values or median (interquartile range [IQR]) values, as appropriate, and discrete variables are expressed as counts (percentages). Statistical significance was determined by the χ2 test, the Fisher exact test, the t test, Z test, and the Mann-Whitney test, as appropriate. Data with a P value of less than 0.05 were considered significant. Multivariate logistic regression models were used to investigate factors that were independently associated with early hematoma growth. Inter-rater reliability of SS and BHS were estimated by κ values.

Results

A total of 200 patients (135 men and 65 women) with spontaneous ICH fulfilled the inclusion criteria and were enrolled in our study. The mean age of the patients was 60.5±12.4 years (age range, 27–90 years). The hematoma was located deep in 80%, in cerebral lobes in 13%, and infratentorial in 7%. Hematoma growth was observed in 71 patients (35.5%) with ICH. There were no statistically significant differences in age, sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking, alcohol drinking, and intraventricular hemorrhage. The mean baseline hematoma volume was 18.5 ml (interquartile range, 10.3–35.4 ml) in patients with early hematoma growth when compared with 11.7 ml (interquartile range, 6.7–16.6 ml) in patients without early hematoma growth (P<0.001). The onset-to-imaging time in patients with early hematoma growth was shorter than that in patients without early hematoma growth (P<0.001). The mean baseline Glasgow coma scale score in patients with early hematoma growth was 12 (interquartile range, 8–14), while that in patients without early hematoma growth was 14 (interquartile range, 12–15) (P<0.001). Detailed data comparing patients with and without early hematoma growth are displayed in Table 1.
Table 1

Baseline characteristics between patients with and without hematoma growth.

VariablesHematoma growth positive (n=71)Hematoma growth negative (n=129)P value
Demographic
 Mean age, y (SD)61.5 (12.4)60.0 (12.4)0.411
 Sex, male, n (%)53 (74.6)82 (63.6)0.109
Medical history
 Alcohol consumption, n (%)32 (45.7)57 (44.5)0.873
 Smoking, n (%)34 (48.6)59 (46.1)0.738
 Hypertension, n (%)48 (68.6)94 (72.9)0.522
 Diabetes mellitus, n (%)8 (11.4)16 (12.4)0.840
Clinical features
 Systolic blood pressure, mmHg (SD)172.5 (29.2)168.8 (28.2)0.377
 Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg SD)99.5 (17.5)97.0 (16.4)0.320
 Baseline hematoma volume, ml(IQR)18.5 (10.3–35.4)11.7 (6.7–16.6)<0.001
 Onset-to-imaging time, h(IQR)1 (1–3)3 (1–4)<0.001
 Baseline GCS score, median(IQR)12 (8–14)14 (12–15)<0.001
 IVH at initial CT, n (%)24 (33.8)45 (34.9)0.878
 Black hole sign, n (%)24 (33.8)6 (4.7)<0.001
 Swirl sign, n (%)33 (46.5)37 (28.7)0.012
 Lobar hemorrhage, n (%)15 (21.1)11 (8.5)0.011
 Deep hemorrhage, n (%)52 (73.2)108 (83.7)0.076
 Infratentorial hemorrhage, n (%)4 (5.6)10 (7.8)0.574

CT – computed tomography; GCS – Glasgow Coma Scale; IVH – intraventricular hemorrhage; IQR – inter-quartile range; SD – standard deviation.

BHS was found in 30 (15%) of 200 patients with ICH, and SS was found in 70 (35%) of 200 patients with ICH at initial CT. Of the 71 patients with early hematoma growth, BHS was found on initial CT scans in 24 (33.8%) and the SS in 33 (46.5%). Detailed baseline demographic, as well as clinical and radiological characteristics, between patient BHS and SS are displayed in Table 2.
Table 2

Baseline characteristics of patients with black hole sign positive and swirl sign positive.

VariablesBlack hole sign positive (n=30)Swirl sign positive (n=70)
Demographic
 Mean age, y (SD)62.5 (13.0)61.1 (11.7)
 Sex, male, n (%)20 (66.7)46 (65.7)
Medical history
 Alcohol consumption, n (%)16 (53.3)31 (44.3)
 Smoking, n (%)16 (53.3)32 (45.7)
 Hypertension, n (%)20 (66.7)53 (75.7)
 Diabetes mellitus, n (%)3 (10)8 (11.4)
Clinical features
Systolic blood pressure, mmHg (SD)164.7 (27.6)167.1 (26.1)
Diastolic blood pressure, mmHg SD)96.7 (14.5)94.5 (14.2)
Baseline hematoma volume, ml(IQR)24.3 (14.9–50.8)18.4 (13.4–29.0)
Onset-to-imaging time, h(IQR)2 (1–3.25)2 (1–4)
Baseline GCS score, median(IQR)10 (7–14)12 (8–14)
IVH at initial CT, n (%)11 (36.7)31 (44.3)
Lobar hemorrhage, n (%)8 (26.7)11 (15.7)
Deep hemorrhage, n (%)21 (70)58 (82.9)
Infratentorial hemorrhage, n (%)1 (3.3)1 (1.4)

CT – computed tomography; GCS – Glasgow Coma Scale; IVH – intraventricular hemorrhage; IQR – inter-quartile range; SD – standard deviation.

The inter-rater agreement for identifying BHS and SS were 0.939 and 0.816, respectively, between the 2 readers. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of BHS for predicting early hematoma growth were 33.8%, 95.3%, 80.0%, and 72.0%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive value of SS for predicting early hematoma growth were 46.5%, 71.3%, 47.0%, and 71%, respectively. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) of the 2 signs for the prediction of early hematoma growth are shown in Figure 2. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.646 for BHS and 0.589 for SS (P=0.08).
Figure 2

Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve using a binary definition of early hematoma growth. The AUC value of the black hole sign=0.646 and the AUC value of the swirl sign=0.589; P=0.08.

In univariate logistic regression, admission Glasgow coma scale, higher baseline hematoma volume, time to CT, and presence of BHS and SS on initial CT scan were associated with early hematoma growth (Table 3). In multivariate logistic regression, the presence of BHS on initial CT remained independently associated with early hematoma growth (odds ratio, 8.51 [95%CI, 2.55–28.40]; P <0.001). However, SS did not predict early hematoma growth in the multivariate logistic analysis (odds ratio, 0.61 [95%CI, 0.26–1.48]; P=0.276; Table 4).
Table 3

Univariate analyses for early hematoma growth.

VariablesOdds ratio95% Confidence intervalP value
Age*1.010.99–1.030.409
Baseline hematoma volume*1.081.05–1.11<0.001
Alcohol consumptiom1.050.58–1.880.873
Smoking1.110.62–1.980.738
Diabetes mellitus0.910.37–2.250.840
Onset-to-imaging time*0.690.57–0.84<0.001
Baseline GCS score*0.860.79–0.940.001
IVH at initial CT0.950.52–1.760.878
Black hole sign10.474.03–27.22<0.001
Swirl sign2.161.18–3.950.012
Lobar hemorrhage2.871.24–6.660.014
Deep hemorrhage0.530.26–1.080.079
Infratentorial hemorrhage0.710.22–2.350.576

CT – computed tomography; GCS – Glasgow Coma Scale; IVH – intraventricular hemorrhage; IQR – inter-quartile range; SD – standard deviation.

Per unit change in regressor.

Table 4

Multivariate analysis for early hematoma growth.

VariablesOdds ratio95% Confidence intervalP value
Black hole sign8.512.55–28.40<0.001
Swirl sign0.610.26–1.480.276
Baseline GCS score*0.960.86–1.070.445
Onset-to-imaging time*0.630.50–0.81<0.001
Baseline hematoma volume*1.081.04–1.12<0.001

GCS – Glasgow Coma Scale.

Per unit change in regressor.

Discussion

In this study, we found that BHS is more accurate than SS in prediction of early hematoma growth when comparing the 2 signs in primary ICH patients. The AUC value of the BHS was 0.646, which was higher than that of SS (P=0.08). Controversy exists over whether SS is an independent predictor of early hematoma growth. In a study of 203 patients with ICH, Selariu et al. first defined SS as an imaging marker for predicting early hematoma growth; the swirl sign was observed in 30% (61/203) of ICH patients in their study. However, the ability to predict early hematoma growth was not investigated [13]. In a study of 56 patients with ICH, Kim et al. found SS was observed in 13 of 56 (23%) patients with ICH, and SS was not independently predictive of hematoma growth [17]. In another study, Gökçe et al. reported that SS was observed in 36 of 45 (80%) patients with ICH [18]. Interestingly, 46.6% (21/45) of patients had anticoagulant-associated ICH, and the time of flow-up CT varied from 1.5 to 192 h, but they did not define hematoma growth. In a retrospective study, Connor et al. studied 71 ICH patients presenting <24 h after onset of symptoms with baseline NCCT, and 24-h follow-up CT [19]. Their study showed SS was observed in 46% (33/71) of patients. Multivariate analysis demonstrated SS is independently associated with early hematoma growth. Recently, Boulouis et al. [11] reported that 207 of 1029 (20%) ICH patients had SS. In univariate analysis, SS was associated with early hematoma growth, but in the multivariable model, SS cannot independently predict hematoma growth. Strikingly, SS was reported in 20% to 80% of patients with ICH. In our study, SS was observed in 35% of patients with ICH. SS can predict early hematoma growth in univariate analysis, but after multivariate analysis, SS could not predict early hematoma growth, which is in accordance with most previous studies. In contrast, BHS, as proposed by Li et al. [10], is a novel NCCT for early hematoma growth in primary ICH, with a high inter-rater agreement (0.939). This could be explained by the rigorous definition of BHS. BHS and SS are both imaging markers that reflect hemorrhage density heterogeneity. Hematoma growth may occur in a cascaded pattern, with initial bleeding causing secondary peripheral vessels rupture for ongoing bleeding [20,21]. The CT attenuation of blood is dependent on the time course of the bleeding [22], so the heterogeneity of the hematoma represents blood of different ages. In addition, the hypoattenuation area may indicate the fresh liquid blood bleeding [23]. However, the hypoattenuation region that connects to adjacent brain tissue may be a normal brain parenchyma, which may be judged as SS according to Selariu’s definition [13], and this might limit the ability to predict early hematoma growth. SS has a vague definition, and the evaluation of SS is more subjective. In BHS, a clear border and a delta of ≥28 HU between the 2 density regions can improve the reliability and subjectivity. Therefore, the inter-rater reliability is higher than with SS. The rigorous definition of BHS results in a high specificity of BHS (95.3%) but a low sensitivity (33.8%). Many studies have documented that the CTA spot sign is a good predictor of early hematoma growth [24]. Recent studies have assessed the correction between CTA spot sign and NCCT markers. In a study of 115 patients with ICH, Zheng et al. reported that blend sign and CTA spot sign are good predictors for early hematoma growth [25]. In a study of 129 patients with ICH, Yu et al. demonstrated that the presence of the BHS is associated with the spot sign, and BHS and CTA spot sign are both predictors of early hematoma growth [14]. Interestingly, they also found early hematoma growth can occur in BHS-positive but CTA spot sign-negative patients. There are several limitations to the present study. Some NCCT appearances can also predict early hematoma growth, but we only compared SS and BHS because SS and BHS are more comparable. This was a single-center study, and multicenter studies are needed to further valuate the predictive value.

Conclusions

To the best of our knowledge, there is no previous study comparing SS and BHS in the prediction of early hematoma growth. Our study shows that BHS is be good predictor of hematoma growth, but baseline NCCT swirl sign does not independently predict hematoma growth in patients with ICH.
  24 in total

1.  Hematoma growth is a determinant of mortality and poor outcome after intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  S M Davis; J Broderick; M Hennerici; N C Brun; M N Diringer; S A Mayer; K Begtrup; T Steiner
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2006-04-25       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 2.  Options to restrict hematoma expansion after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  Thorsten Steiner; Julian Bösel
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 7.914

3.  Association Between Hypodensities Detected by Computed Tomography and Hematoma Expansion in Patients With Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

Authors:  Gregoire Boulouis; Andrea Morotti; H Bart Brouwers; Andreas Charidimou; Michael J Jessel; Eitan Auriel; Octávio Pontes-Neto; Alison Ayres; Anastasia Vashkevich; Kristin M Schwab; Jonathan Rosand; Anand Viswanathan; Mahmut E Gurol; Steven M Greenberg; Joshua N Goldstein
Journal:  JAMA Neurol       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 18.302

4.  Anatomic pattern of intracerebral hemorrhage expansion: relation to CT angiography spot sign and hematoma center.

Authors:  Grégoire Boulouis; Andrew Dumas; Rebecca A Betensky; H Bart Brouwers; Panagiotis Fotiadis; Anastasia Vashkevich; Alison Ayres; Kristin Schwab; Javier M Romero; Eric E Smith; Anand Viswanathan; Joshua N Goldstein; Jonathan Rosand; M Edip Gurol; Steven M Greenberg
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 5.  The Pathophysiology of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Formation and Expansion.

Authors:  Frieder Schlunk; Steven M Greenberg
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2015-06-16       Impact factor: 6.829

Review 6.  Worldwide stroke incidence and early case fatality reported in 56 population-based studies: a systematic review.

Authors:  Valery L Feigin; Carlene M M Lawes; Derrick A Bennett; Suzanne L Barker-Collo; Varsha Parag
Journal:  Lancet Neurol       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 44.182

7.  Contrast extravasation on CT predicts mortality in primary intracerebral hemorrhage.

Authors:  J Kim; A Smith; J C Hemphill; W S Smith; Y Lu; W P Dillon; M Wintermark
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Evaluation of Oral Anticoagulant-Associated Intracranial Parenchymal Hematomas Using CT Findings.

Authors:  E Gökçe; M Beyhan; B Acu
Journal:  Clin Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.649

9.  Swirl sign in intracerebral haemorrhage: definition, prevalence, reliability and prognostic value.

Authors:  Eufrozina Selariu; Elisabet Zia; Marco Brizzi; Kasim Abul-Kasim
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2012-09-26       Impact factor: 2.474

Review 10.  The accuracy of spot sign in predicting hematoma expansion after intracerebral hemorrhage: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fei-Zhou Du; Rui Jiang; Ming Gu; Ci He; Jing Guan
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  7 in total

Review 1.  Computed Tomography Imaging Predictors of Intracerebral Hemorrhage Expansion.

Authors:  Xin-Ni Lv; Lan Deng; Wen-Song Yang; Xiao Wei; Qi Li
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2021-03-12       Impact factor: 5.081

2.  Comparison of CT black hole sign and other CT features in predicting hematoma expansion in patients with ICH.

Authors:  Gui-Nv He; Hao-Zhan Guo; Xiong Han; En-Feng Wang; Yan-Qiu Zhang
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 4.849

3.  Leakage sign for acute subdural hematoma in clinical treatment.

Authors:  Masafumi Yamamoto; Kimihiko Orito; Yukihiko Nakamura; Nobuyuki Takeshige; Munetake Yoshitomi; Yasuharu Takeuchi; Hideaki Uzu; Osamu Takasu; Toshi Abe; Shuichi Tanoue; Yuusuke Uchiyama; Motohiro Morioka
Journal:  Acta Neurochir (Wien)       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 2.216

4.  External validation study on the value of deep learning algorithm for the prediction of hematoma expansion from noncontrast CT scans.

Authors:  Dong Chuang Guo; Jun Gu; Jian He; Hai Rui Chu; Na Dong; Yi Feng Zheng
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 1.930

5.  Bloody Ventriculography: Intracerebral Hemorrhage Artistically Casting the Ventricular System's Anatomy Into a Bird's Head.

Authors:  Afaf Shaabi
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-03-14

6.  Inter- and Intrarater Agreement of Spot Sign and Noncontrast CT Markers for Early Intracerebral Hemorrhage Expansion.

Authors:  Jawed Nawabi; Sarah Elsayed; Helge Kniep; Peter Sporns; Frieder Schlunk; Rosalie McDonough; Gabriel Broocks; Lasse Dührsen; Gerhard Schön; Thomalla Götz; Jens Fiehler; Uta Hanning
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-04-04       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 7.  Minimally Invasive Intracerebral Hemorrhage Evacuation Techniques: A Review.

Authors:  Theodore C Hannah; Rebecca Kellner; Christopher P Kellner
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-03-23
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.