Literature DB >> 29374137

Inhalation Frequency Controls Reformatting of Mitral/Tufted Cell Odor Representations in the Olfactory Bulb.

Marta Díaz-Quesada1, Isaac A Youngstrom1, Yusuke Tsuno1, Kyle R Hansen2, Michael N Economo1, Matt Wachowiak3.   

Abstract

In mammals, olfactory sensation depends on inhalation, which controls activation of sensory neurons and temporal patterning of central activity. Odor representations by mitral and tufted (MT) cells, the main output from the olfactory bulb (OB), reflect sensory input as well as excitation and inhibition from OB circuits, which may change as sniff frequency increases. To test the impact of sampling frequency on MT cell odor responses, we obtained whole-cell recordings from MT cells in anesthetized male and female mice while varying inhalation frequency via tracheotomy, allowing comparison of inhalation-linked responses across cells. We characterized frequency effects on MT cell responses during inhalation of air and odorants using inhalation pulses and also "playback" of sniffing recorded from awake mice. Inhalation-linked changes in membrane potential were well predicted across frequency from linear convolution of 1 Hz responses; and, as frequency increased, near-identical temporal responses could emerge from depolarizing, hyperpolarizing, or multiphasic MT responses. However, net excitation was not well predicted from 1 Hz responses and varied substantially across MT cells, with some cells increasing and others decreasing in spike rate. As a result, sustained odorant sampling at higher frequencies led to increasing decorrelation of the MT cell population response pattern over time. Bulk activation of sensory inputs by optogenetic stimulation affected MT cells more uniformly across frequency, suggesting that frequency-dependent decorrelation emerges from odor-specific patterns of activity in the OB network. These results suggest that sampling behavior alone can reformat early sensory representations, possibly to optimize sensory perception during repeated sampling.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Olfactory sensation in mammals depends on inhalation, which increases in frequency during active sampling of olfactory stimuli. We asked how inhalation frequency can shape the neural coding of odor information by recording from projection neurons of the olfactory bulb while artificially varying odor sampling frequency in the anesthetized mouse. We found that sampling an odor at higher frequencies led to diverse changes in net responsiveness, as measured by action potential output, that were not predicted from low-frequency responses. These changes led to a reorganization of the pattern of neural activity evoked by a given odorant that occurred preferentially during sustained, high-frequency inhalation. These results point to a novel mechanism for modulating early sensory representations solely as a function of sampling behavior.
Copyright © 2018 the authors 0270-6474/18/382189-18$15.00/0.

Entities:  

Keywords:  coding; in vivo; optogenetics; patch clamp; sniffing

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29374137      PMCID: PMC5830510          DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0714-17.2018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosci        ISSN: 0270-6474            Impact factor:   6.167


  59 in total

1.  Frequency-dependent modulation of inhibition in the rat olfactory bulb.

Authors:  T A Young; D A Wilson
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  1999-11-26       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  Representation of odorants by receptor neuron input to the mouse olfactory bulb.

Authors:  M Wachowiak; L B Cohen
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2001-11-20       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Temporal dynamics and latency patterns of receptor neuron input to the olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Hartwig Spors; Matt Wachowiak; Lawrence B Cohen; Rainer W Friedrich
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-25       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 4.  Coding and transformations in the olfactory system.

Authors:  Naoshige Uchida; Cindy Poo; Rafi Haddad
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 12.449

5.  Respiration drives network activity and modulates synaptic and circuit processing of lateral inhibition in the olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Matthew E Phillips; Robert N S Sachdev; David C Willhite; Gordon M Shepherd
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-01-04       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Phasic stimuli evoke precisely timed spikes in intermittently discharging mitral cells.

Authors:  Ramani Balu; Phillip Larimer; Ben W Strowbridge
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.714

7.  Control of Mitral/Tufted Cell Output by Selective Inhibition among Olfactory Bulb Glomeruli.

Authors:  Michael N Economo; Kyle R Hansen; Matt Wachowiak
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  Functional transformations of odor inputs in the mouse olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Yoav Adam; Yoav Livneh; Kazunari Miyamichi; Maya Groysman; Liqun Luo; Adi Mizrahi
Journal:  Front Neural Circuits       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 3.492

9.  'Silent' mitral cells dominate odor responses in the olfactory bulb of awake mice.

Authors:  Mihaly Kollo; Anja Schmaltz; Mostafa Abdelhamid; Izumi Fukunaga; Andreas T Schaefer
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2014-07-27       Impact factor: 24.884

10.  Context- and Output Layer-Dependent Long-Term Ensemble Plasticity in a Sensory Circuit.

Authors:  Yoshiyuki Yamada; Khaleel Bhaukaurally; Tamás J Madarász; Alexandre Pouget; Ivan Rodriguez; Alan Carleton
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2017-02-23       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  7 in total

1.  Differential Impacts of Repeated Sampling on Odor Representations by Genetically-Defined Mitral and Tufted Cell Subpopulations in the Mouse Olfactory Bulb.

Authors:  Thomas P Eiting; Matt Wachowiak
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2020-06-29       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Sniff-synchronized, gradient-guided olfactory search by freely moving mice.

Authors:  Teresa M Findley; David G Wyrick; Jennifer L Cramer; Morgan A Brown; Blake Holcomb; Robin Attey; Dorian Yeh; Eric Monasevitch; Nelly Nouboussi; Isabelle Cullen; Jeremea O Songco; Jared F King; Yashar Ahmadian; Matthew C Smear
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2021-05-04       Impact factor: 8.140

3.  Temporal Dynamics of Inhalation-Linked Activity across Defined Subpopulations of Mouse Olfactory Bulb Neurons Imaged In Vivo.

Authors:  Shaina M Short; Matt Wachowiak
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2019-06-27

4.  Dynamics of Glutamatergic Drive Underlie Diverse Responses of Olfactory Bulb Outputs In Vivo.

Authors:  Andrew K Moran; Thomas P Eiting; Matt Wachowiak
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2021-04-19

5.  Coupling of Mouse Olfactory Bulb Projection Neurons to Fluctuating Odor Pulses.

Authors:  Debanjan Dasgupta; Tom P A Warner; Andrew Erskine; Andreas T Schaefer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 6.709

6.  Sniffing Fast: Paradoxical Effects on Odor Concentration Discrimination at the Levels of Olfactory Bulb Output and Behavior.

Authors:  Rebecca Jordan; Mihaly Kollo; Andreas T Schaefer
Journal:  eNeuro       Date:  2018-12-26

7.  Sniffing speeds up chemical detection by controlling air-flows near sensors.

Authors:  Thomas L Spencer; Adams Clark; Jordi Fonollosa; Emmanuel Virot; David L Hu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 14.919

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.