Megan S McHenry1,2, Carole I McAteer3,2, Eren Oyungu4, Brenna C McDonald5, Chris B Bosma3, Philani B Mpofu6, Andrew R Deathe3, Rachel C Vreeman3,2,4. 1. Departments of Pediatrics, msuhl@iu.edu. 2. Academic Model Providing Access to Healthcare, Eldoret, Kenya; and. 3. Departments of Pediatrics. 4. Department of Child Health and Paediatrics, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Moi University, Eldoret, Kenya. 5. Radiology and Imaging Sciences, and. 6. Biostatistics, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana.
Abstract
CONTEXT: HIV-infected (HIV+) children have worse neurodevelopmental outcomes compared with HIV-uninfected children. However, little is known regarding the differences in neurodevelopment between young HIV+ children, HIV-exposed but uninfected (HEU) children, and HIV-unexposed and uninfected (HUU) children. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review and meta-analyze data on neurodevelopmental performance between young HIV+, HEU, and HUU children. DATA SOURCES: We systematically searched the following electronic bibliographic databases: Ovid Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Education Resources Information Center, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were selected on the basis of defined inclusion criteria. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were assessed by 2 independent reviewers. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers and cross-checked by 2 additional reviewers. RESULTS: Forty-five studies were identified for inclusion in the systematic review, and of these, 11 were included in the meta-analysis on the basis of availability of Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development scores. Within the meta-analysis, when compared with their HUU peers, HIV+ and HEU children had lower cognitive and motor scores. HIV+ and HEU children with antiretroviral (ARV) exposure had lower cognitive and motor scores compared with those without ARV exposure. LIMITATIONS: We were unable to control adequately for intravenous drug use, geographic location, or quality of the assessment independently. CONCLUSIONS: Both HIV+ and HEU children had worse developmental outcomes compared with HUU children. HIV+ and HEU children with ARV exposure also had worse developmental outcomes compared with those without exposure; however, these results should be interpreted with caution. More research is needed to identify the impact of ARV exposure on young children.
CONTEXT: HIV-infected (HIV+) children have worse neurodevelopmental outcomes compared with HIV-uninfectedchildren. However, little is known regarding the differences in neurodevelopment between young HIV+ children, HIV-exposed but uninfected (HEU) children, and HIV-unexposed and uninfected (HUU) children. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review and meta-analyze data on neurodevelopmental performance between young HIV+, HEU, and HUU children. DATA SOURCES: We systematically searched the following electronic bibliographic databases: Ovid Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Education Resources Information Center, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. STUDY SELECTION: Studies were selected on the basis of defined inclusion criteria. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were assessed by 2 independent reviewers. DATA EXTRACTION: Data were extracted by 2 independent reviewers and cross-checked by 2 additional reviewers. RESULTS: Forty-five studies were identified for inclusion in the systematic review, and of these, 11 were included in the meta-analysis on the basis of availability of Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development scores. Within the meta-analysis, when compared with their HUU peers, HIV+ and HEU children had lower cognitive and motor scores. HIV+ and HEU children with antiretroviral (ARV) exposure had lower cognitive and motor scores compared with those without ARV exposure. LIMITATIONS: We were unable to control adequately for intravenous drug use, geographic location, or quality of the assessment independently. CONCLUSIONS: Both HIV+ and HEU children had worse developmental outcomes compared with HUU children. HIV+ and HEU children with ARV exposure also had worse developmental outcomes compared with those without exposure; however, these results should be interpreted with caution. More research is needed to identify the impact of ARV exposure on young children.
Authors: D Drotar; K Olness; M Wiznitzer; L Guay; L Marum; G Svilar; D Hom; J F Fagan; C Ndugwa; R Kiziri-Mayengo Journal: Pediatrics Date: 1997-07 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: C Macmillan; L S Magder; P Brouwers; C Chase; J Hittelman; T Lasky; K Malee; C A Mellins; J Velez-Borras Journal: Neurology Date: 2001-10-23 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Christine M McDonald; Karim P Manji; Roland Kupka; David C Bellinger; Donna Spiegelman; Rodrick Kisenge; Gernard Msamanga; Wafaie W Fawzi; Christopher P Duggan Journal: J Nutr Date: 2012-12-19 Impact factor: 4.798
Authors: Paige L Williams; Miguel Marino; Kathleen Malee; Susan Brogly; Michael D Hughes; Lynne M Mofenson Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2010-01-18 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: Stanzi M le Roux; Kirsten A Donald; Kirsty Brittain; Tamsin K Phillips; Allison Zerbe; Kelly K Nguyen; Andrea Strandvik; Max Kroon; Elaine J Abrams; Landon Myer Journal: AIDS Date: 2018-08-24 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Rachel S Gruver; Sumaya Mall; Jane D Kvalsvig; Justin R Knox; Claude A Mellins; Chris Desmond; Shuaib Kauchali; Stephen M Arpadi; Myra Taylor; Leslie L Davidson Journal: New Dir Child Adolesc Dev Date: 2020-07-03
Authors: Thomas Struyf; Queen Dube; Elizabeth A Cromwell; Anna D Sheahan; Robert S Heyderman; Annelies Van Rie Journal: Eur J Paediatr Neurol Date: 2019-11-21 Impact factor: 3.140
Authors: Megan M Duffey; David Ayuku; George Ayodo; Emily Abuonji; Mark Nyalumbe; Amy K Giella; Julie N Hook; Tuan M Tran; Megan S McHenry Journal: J Int Neuropsychol Soc Date: 2021-05-24 Impact factor: 2.892