Renate Strehlau1, Stephanie Shiau2,3, Stephen Arpadi2,4,5,3, Faeezah Patel1, Francoise Pinillos1, Wei-Yann Tsai6, Ashraf Coovadia1, Elaine Abrams4,5,3, Louise Kuhn2,3. 1. Empilweni Services and Research Unit, Rahima Moosa Mother and Child Hospital, School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, South Africa. 2. Gertrude H. Sergievsky Center, Columbia University. 3. ICAP, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University. 4. Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University. 5. Department of Biostatistics, Columbia University. 6. Department of Pediatrics, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Abacavir has replaced stavudine in antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens because it has largely been phased out as a result of toxicity concerns; this loss has reduced further the already-limited drug options for children. Few data regarding virologic and metabolic outcomes among children who undergo substitution of stavudine exist. We evaluated the effects of preemptive substitution of abacavir for stavudine in children initially without lipodystrophy and virally suppressed on a stavudine-containing regimen. METHODS: At Rahima Moosa Mother and Child Hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa, virally suppressed human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected children ≥36 months of age without lipodystrophy were randomly assigned to continue taking stavudine as part of their ART regimen (n = 106) or to have abacavir substituted for stavudine (n = 107). The children were followed for 56 weeks after randomization in the context of a larger trial of treatment options for ART-experienced children. RESULTS: The mean age of the children was 4.3 years, and the mean duration of ART before random assignment was 3.5 years. No differences in virological outcomes, CD4 response, growth, or dyslipidemia were noted between the stavudine and abacavir groups. By 56 weeks, children in the abacavir group had less clinically detected lipodystrophy (4.7% vs 16%, respectively), a higher proportion of leg fat relative to total fat (0.243 vs 0.230, respectively; P = .006), and a lower trunk/leg-skinfold ratio (0.547 vs 0.569, respectively; P = .003) than the children in the stavudine group. CONCLUSION: Substituting abacavir for stavudine did not compromise virological response to treatment and was associated with significantly less lipodystrophy. These results support recommendations that favor abacavir in this population.
OBJECTIVES: Abacavir has replaced stavudine in antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimens because it has largely been phased out as a result of toxicity concerns; this loss has reduced further the already-limited drug options for children. Few data regarding virologic and metabolic outcomes among children who undergo substitution of stavudine exist. We evaluated the effects of preemptive substitution of abacavir for stavudine in children initially without lipodystrophy and virally suppressed on a stavudine-containing regimen. METHODS: At Rahima Moosa Mother and Child Hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa, virally suppressed human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected children ≥36 months of age without lipodystrophy were randomly assigned to continue taking stavudine as part of their ART regimen (n = 106) or to have abacavir substituted for stavudine (n = 107). The children were followed for 56 weeks after randomization in the context of a larger trial of treatment options for ART-experienced children. RESULTS: The mean age of the children was 4.3 years, and the mean duration of ART before random assignment was 3.5 years. No differences in virological outcomes, CD4 response, growth, or dyslipidemia were noted between the stavudine and abacavir groups. By 56 weeks, children in the abacavir group had less clinically detected lipodystrophy (4.7% vs 16%, respectively), a higher proportion of leg fat relative to total fat (0.243 vs 0.230, respectively; P = .006), and a lower trunk/leg-skinfold ratio (0.547 vs 0.569, respectively; P = .003) than the children in the stavudine group. CONCLUSION: Substituting abacavir for stavudine did not compromise virological response to treatment and was associated with significantly less lipodystrophy. These results support recommendations that favor abacavir in this population.
Authors: S Duran; M Savès; B Spire; V Cailleton; A Sobel; P Carrieri; D Salmon; J P Moatti; C Leport Journal: AIDS Date: 2001-12-07 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Adrian Curran; Esteban Martinez; Maria Saumoy; Luis del Rio; Manuel Crespo; Maria Larrousse; Daniel Podzamczer; Joaquin Burgos; Montse Lonca; Pere Domingo; Jose Maria Gatell; Esteban Ribera Journal: AIDS Date: 2012-02-20 Impact factor: 4.177
Authors: Ana Milinkovic; Esteban Martinez; Sonia López; Elisa de Lazzari; Oscar Miró; Sergi Vidal; José L Blanco; Gloria Garrabou; Montserrat Laguno; Joan A Arnaiz; Agathe Leon; Maria Larrousse; Montserrat Lonca; Josep Mallolas; José M Gatell Journal: Antivir Ther Date: 2007
Authors: Mary Horlick; Stephen M Arpadi; James Bethel; Jack Wang; Jack Moye; Patricia Cuff; Richard N Pierson; Donald Kotler Journal: Am J Clin Nutr Date: 2002-11 Impact factor: 7.045
Authors: Veronica Mulenga; Victor Musiime; Adeodata Kekitiinwa; Adrian D Cook; George Abongomera; Julia Kenny; Chisala Chabala; Grace Mirembe; Alice Asiimwe; Ellen Owen-Powell; David Burger; Helen McIlleron; Nigel Klein; Chifumbe Chintu; Margaret J Thomason; Cissy Kityo; A Sarah Walker; Diana M Gibb Journal: Lancet Infect Dis Date: 2015-10-05 Impact factor: 25.071
Authors: Julie Jesson; Laura Saint-Lary; Marc Harris Dassi Tchoupa Revegue; John O'Rourke; Claire L Townsend; Françoise Renaud; Martina Penazzato; Valériane Leroy Journal: Lancet Child Adolesc Health Date: 2022-09-02