Literature DB >> 29372355

Worth a second look: outcomes of patients with initial finding of regular renal tissue in CT-guided renal tumor biopsies.

M Sadat-Khonsari1, M Papayannis1, P Schriefer1, L Kluth1,2, C Meyer1, V Schüttfort1, M Regier3, M Rink1, F Chun1,2, M Fisch1, A Becker4,5.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION AND
OBJECTIVE: Renal tumor biopsy is recommended for histological diagnosis of radiologically indeterminate renal masses, to select patients with small-renal masses for surveillance approaches, before ablative treatments and to confirm metastatic spread of renal cell cancer (RCC), according to the EAU guidelines. We aimed to determine outcomes of patients with suspicious renal masses with initial finding of regular renal tissue in renal tumor biopsies.
METHODS: Retrospective database analysis of 101 patients undergoing CT-guided-, percutaneous renal tumor biopsies in local anesthesia.
RESULTS: In 23/101 patients, histopathologic evaluation of the biopsies showed regular renal tissue. Of these, two patients underwent simultaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA), 2/23 underwent radical nephrectomy, despite negative biopsy because of radiological suspicious aspect. Overall, 12 patients underwent a second set of biopsies due to persistent clinical suspicion. Of these, five were diagnosed with RCC: three clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) and two papillary renal cell carcinoma (pRCC). Benign tumours were found in two patients. A lymphoma was found in two patients. In 3/12 patients, also the second set of biopsies showed regular renal tissue.
CONCLUSION: An unsuspicious histology in CT-guided renal tumor biopsy does not preclude patients with suspicious renal masses from being diagnosed with malignancies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Renal cell carcinoma; Renal tumor biopsy; Surveillance

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29372355     DOI: 10.1007/s00345-017-2170-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Urol        ISSN: 0724-4983            Impact factor:   4.226


  13 in total

Review 1.  Clinical practice. Small renal mass.

Authors:  Inderbir S Gill; Monish Aron; Debra A Gervais; Michael A S Jewett
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2010-02-18       Impact factor: 91.245

2.  Are small renal tumors harmless? Analysis of histopathological features according to tumors 4 cm or less in diameter.

Authors:  Mesut Remzi; Mehmet Ozsoy; Hans-Christoph Klingler; Martin Susani; Matthias Waldert; Christian Seitz; Joerg Schmidbauer; Michael Marberger
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 3.  Role of percutaneous needle biopsy for renal masses.

Authors:  Elaine M Caoili; Matthew S Davenport
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  Delay in nephrectomy and cancer control outcomes in elderly patients with small renal masses.

Authors:  Andreas Becker; Florian Roghmann; Praful Ravi; Zhe Tian; Luis Alexander Kluth; Giorgio Gandaglia; Joachim Noldus; Roland Dahlem; Thorsten Schlomm; Markus Graefen; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Quoc-Dien Trinh; Maxine Sun
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 5.  Renal masses in the adult patient: the role of percutaneous biopsy.

Authors:  Stuart G Silverman; Yu Unn Gan; Koenraad J Mortele; Kemal Tuncali; Edmund S Cibas
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 6.  The natural history of observed enhancing renal masses: meta-analysis and review of the world literature.

Authors:  Sam N Chawla; Paul L Crispen; Alexandra L Hanlon; Richard E Greenberg; David Y T Chen; Robert G Uzzo
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Cancer Statistics, 2017.

Authors:  Rebecca L Siegel; Kimberly D Miller; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2017-01-05       Impact factor: 508.702

8.  Tumor size does not predict risk of metastatic disease or prognosis of small renal cell carcinomas.

Authors:  Tobias Klatte; Jean-Jacques Patard; Michela de Martino; Karim Bensalah; Gregory Verhoest; Alexandre de la Taille; Clément-Claude Abbou; Ernst Peter Allhoff; Giuseppe Carrieri; Stephen B Riggs; Fairooz F Kabbinavar; Arie S Belldegrun; Allan J Pantuck
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2008-03-17       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Solid renal tumors: an analysis of pathological features related to tumor size.

Authors:  Igor Frank; Michael L Blute; John C Cheville; Christine M Lohse; Amy L Weaver; Horst Zincke
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Outcomes of percutaneous kidney biopsy, including those of solitary native kidneys.

Authors:  D C Mendelssohn; E H Cole
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 8.860

View more
  3 in total

1.  Subspecialty Second-Opinion in Multiple Myeloma CT: Emphasis on Clinically Significant Lytic Lesions.

Authors:  Alberto Stefano Tagliafico; Liliana Belgioia; Alessandro Bonsignore; Federica Rossi; Giulia Succio; Bianca Bignotti; Alida Dominietto
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-04-23       Impact factor: 2.430

Review 2.  Computed Tomography-guided Core Needle Biopsy for Renal Tumors: A Review.

Authors:  Toshihiro Iguchi; Yusuke Matsui; Koji Tomita; Mayu Uka; Toshiyuki Komaki; Soichiro Kajita; Noriyuki Umakoshi; Kazuaki Munetomo; Hideo Gobara; Susumu Kanazawa
Journal:  Interv Radiol (Higashimatsuyama)       Date:  2021-04-15

3.  The Early Diagnostic and Prognostic Value of BIRC5 in Clear-Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Based on the Cancer Genome Atlas Data.

Authors:  Jingyuan Wang; Min Chen; Chengxue Dang; Hao Zhang; Xin Wang; Jianhao Yin; Rui Jia; Yong Zhang
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2021-07-15       Impact factor: 1.934

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.