Literature DB >> 24602994

Delay in nephrectomy and cancer control outcomes in elderly patients with small renal masses.

Andreas Becker1, Florian Roghmann, Praful Ravi, Zhe Tian, Luis Alexander Kluth, Giorgio Gandaglia, Joachim Noldus, Roland Dahlem, Thorsten Schlomm, Markus Graefen, Pierre I Karakiewicz, Quoc-Dien Trinh, Maxine Sun.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of nephrectomy delay on the survival of patients with small renal masses.
METHODS: Relying on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Medicare-linked database, 6,237 patients with pT1a renal cell carcinoma who underwent radical or partial nephrectomy were identified (1988-2005). Nephrectomy delay was dichotomized as ≤3 vs. >3 months. Uni- and multivariate Cox regression analyses tested the effect of delayed nephrectomy on cancer-specific mortality (CSM). In sub-analyses, various other time from diagnosis to nephrectomy cut-offs were modelled: (a) ≤1 vs. >1 month, (b) ≤2 vs. >2 months, (c) ≤4 vs. >4 months, (d) ≤6 vs. >6 months, (e) ≤12 vs. >12 months or (f) continuously coded.
RESULTS: In univariate analyses, nephrectomy delay >3 months was associated with a higher risk of CSM (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.07; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.58-2.72; p < 0.001). However, after multivariate adjustment, a nephrectomy delay >3 months was not significantly associated with a higher risk of CSM (HR: 1.33; 95% CI: 0.96-1.86; p = 0.09). The lack of a relationship between nephrectomy delay and CSM after multivariate adjustment persisted even in various sub-analyses of other categorizations for nephrectomy delay.
CONCLUSIONS: In the case of eventual nephrectomy delay among patients with small renal masses, CSM is unaffected.
© 2014 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24602994     DOI: 10.1159/000356175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urol Int        ISSN: 0042-1138            Impact factor:   2.089


  5 in total

1.  Worth a second look: outcomes of patients with initial finding of regular renal tissue in CT-guided renal tumor biopsies.

Authors:  M Sadat-Khonsari; M Papayannis; P Schriefer; L Kluth; C Meyer; V Schüttfort; M Regier; M Rink; F Chun; M Fisch; A Becker
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Active Surveillance for Risk Stratification of All Small Renal Masses Lacking Predefined Clinical Criteria for Intervention.

Authors:  Arun R Menon; Ahmed A Hussein; Kristopher M Attwood; Tashionna White; Gaybrielle James; Bo Xu; Michael Petroziello; Charles L Roche; Eric C Kauffman
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 7.600

Review 3.  Small renal masses in the elderly: Contemporary treatment approaches and comparative oncological outcomes of nonsurgical and surgical strategies.

Authors:  Malte W Vetterlein; Tarun Jindal; Andreas Becker; Marc Regier; Luis A Kluth; Derya Tilki; Felix K-H Chun
Journal:  Investig Clin Urol       Date:  2016-07-05

4.  Surgical treatment for renal masses in the elderly: analysis of oncological, surgical and functional outcomes.

Authors:  Slawomir Poletajew; Piotr Zapała; Bartlomiej Kopczyński; Lukasz Białek; Sylwia Bender; Tomasz Mutrynowski; Mateusz Nowak; Julia Mróz; Grzegorz Pędzisz; Bartosz Dybowski; Piotr Radziszewski
Journal:  Int Braz J Urol       Date:  2019 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.541

5.  Delayed surgery for localised and metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis for the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors:  Vinson Wai-Shun Chan; Wei Shen Tan; Jeffrey J Leow; Wei Phin Tan; William Lay Keat Ong; Peter Ka-Fung Chiu; Pratik Gurung; Giacomo Maria Pirola; Luca Orecchia; Matthew Ping Chao Liew; Hsiang-Ying Lee; Yuding Wang; I-Hsuan Alan Chen; Daniele Castellani; Marcelo Langer Wroclawski; Nikhil Mayor; Niranjan J Sathianathen; Isaac Braga; Zhenbang Liu; Dora Moon; Kari Tikkinen; Ashish Kamat; Max Meng; Vincenzo Ficarra; Gianluca Giannarini; Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 4.226

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.