Catherine W Cahill1, Kristen E Radcliffe2, Charles Reitman3. 1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX. 2. Thomas Jefferson University Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rothman Institute, Egg Harbor, NJ. 3. MUSC Department of Orthopaedics, Charleston, SC.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Very little normative CT scan data exist defining expected relationships of vertebral structures in the intact cervical spine. Better understanding of normal relationships should improve sensitivity of injury detection, particularly for facet subluxation. The purpose of this paper was to describe the normal anatomical relationships and most sensitive measurements to detect abnormal alignment in the subaxial cervical spine. METHODS: A group of 30 CT scans with no documented cervical spine injury were utilized from an established data base in a trauma population. Twenty-two anatomical measurements were made for each level of the subaxial cervical spine using Microview software. For the purposes of measurement, the upper confidence limit of normal was reported as two standard deviations from the mean. RESULTS: The novel, CT based measurements of bone articulation were generally smaller and had lower confidence intervals compared to traditional radiographic measurements of midline structures (such as interspinous distance, interlaminar widening, disc space widening). The upper limit of normal of facet joint height was reported (1.54mm anterior, 1.27mm posterior, and 2.0mm midportion) which may help identify distractive-flexion injuries. The upper limit of normal vertebral translation (2.0mm) was also reported to identify translation/rotation injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Normal CT measurements for the subaxial cervical spine, especially in the facets, were found to have small confidence limits and variation. Based upon these findings, we conclude that facet measurements and translation may be better screening tools than traditional radiographic criteria based upon midline structures. Using these measurements may improve detection of cervical spine injuries warranting further imaging or investigation and reducing missed injuries. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Improved understanding of normal anatomic measures in the subaxial spine will allow for better screening and identification of injuries. ETHICAL STATEMENT: This was approved by the Office of Research Institutional Review Board, Baylor College of Medicine.
BACKGROUND: Very little normative CT scan data exist defining expected relationships of vertebral structures in the intact cervical spine. Better understanding of normal relationships should improve sensitivity of injury detection, particularly for facet subluxation. The purpose of this paper was to describe the normal anatomical relationships and most sensitive measurements to detect abnormal alignment in the subaxial cervical spine. METHODS: A group of 30 CT scans with no documented cervical spine injury were utilized from an established data base in a trauma population. Twenty-two anatomical measurements were made for each level of the subaxial cervical spine using Microview software. For the purposes of measurement, the upper confidence limit of normal was reported as two standard deviations from the mean. RESULTS: The novel, CT based measurements of bone articulation were generally smaller and had lower confidence intervals compared to traditional radiographic measurements of midline structures (such as interspinous distance, interlaminar widening, disc space widening). The upper limit of normal of facet joint height was reported (1.54mm anterior, 1.27mm posterior, and 2.0mm midportion) which may help identify distractive-flexion injuries. The upper limit of normal vertebral translation (2.0mm) was also reported to identify translation/rotation injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Normal CT measurements for the subaxial cervical spine, especially in the facets, were found to have small confidence limits and variation. Based upon these findings, we conclude that facet measurements and translation may be better screening tools than traditional radiographic criteria based upon midline structures. Using these measurements may improve detection of cervical spine injuries warranting further imaging or investigation and reducing missed injuries. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Improved understanding of normal anatomic measures in the subaxial spine will allow for better screening and identification of injuries. ETHICAL STATEMENT: This was approved by the Office of Research Institutional Review Board, Baylor College of Medicine.
Authors: Kristen E Radcliff; Peleg Ben-Galim; Niv Dreiangel; Shannon B Martin; Charles A Reitman; James N Lin; John A Hipp Journal: Spine J Date: 2010-03 Impact factor: 4.166
Authors: J D Berne; G C Velmahos; Q El-Tawil; D Demetriades; J A Asensio; J A Murray; E E Cornwell; H Belzberg; T V Berne Journal: J Trauma Date: 1999-11
Authors: Christopher M Bono; Alexander R Vaccaro; Michael Fehlings; Charles Fisher; Marcel Dvorak; Steven Ludwig; James Harrop Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2007-03-01 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Margaret M Griffen; Eric R Frykberg; Andrew J Kerwin; Miren A Schinco; Joseph J Tepas; Kathleen Rowe; Jennifer Abboud Journal: J Trauma Date: 2003-08
Authors: Reshma Mathen; Kenji Inaba; Felipe Munera; Pedro G R Teixeira; Luis Rivas; Mark McKenney; Peter Lopez; Carlos J Ledezma Journal: J Trauma Date: 2007-06
Authors: Nestor D Tomycz; Brandon G Chew; Yue-Fang Chang; Joseph M Darby; Scott R Gunn; Dederia H Nicholas; Juan B Ochoa; Andrew B Peitzman; Eric Schwartz; Hans-Christoph Pape; Richard M Spiro; David O Okonkwo Journal: J Trauma Date: 2008-05