Literature DB >> 1132209

Biomechanical analysis of clinical stability in the cervical spine.

A A White, R M Johnson, M M Panjabi, W O Southwick.   

Abstract

This study was undertaken because there is a dearth of objective information in the literature on the clinical instability of the cervical spine below C2. To our knowledge, it is the first biomechanical investigation designed to analyze clinical stability. We have carried out a quantitative analysis of the behavior of the spine as a function of the systematic destruction of various anatomic elements. Under controlled conditions designed to maintain the biological integrity of the specimens, 17 motion segments from 8 cervical spines were analyzed. The spines were studied with either flexion or extension simulated using physiologic loads. Some of the more important findings are: (1) In sectioning the ligaments, one observes small increments of change followed without warning by sudden, complete disruption of the spine; (2) Removal of the facets alters the motion segment such that in flexion, there is less angular displacement and more horizontal displacement; (3) The anterior ligaments contribute more to stability in extension than the posterior ligaments and in flexion, the converse is true; (4) The adult cervical spine is unstable, or on the brink of instability, when any of the following conditions are present: a) All the anterior or all the posterior elements are destroyed or unable to function. b) More than 3.5 mm horizontal displacement of one vertebra in relation to an adjacent vertebra measured on lateral roentgenograms (resting or flexion-extension). c) More than 11 degrees of rotation difference to that of either adjacent vertebra measured on a resting lateral or flexion-extension roentgenogram. These findings can be aptly applied to clinical situations and when instability as determined by the above criteria is present, surgical fusion or some other method to achieve stability should be seriously considered. Work is continuing on this problem as we do not consider this to be altogether complete or definitive. Hopefully, this initial study will stimulate further scientific and clinical investigations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1975        PMID: 1132209     DOI: 10.1097/00003086-197506000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  67 in total

1.  Long-term stability after multilevel cervical laminectomy for spinal cord tumor resection in von Hippel-Lindau disease.

Authors:  Ashok R Asthagiri; Gautam U Mehta; John A Butman; Martin Baggenstos; Edward H Oldfield; Russell R Lonser
Journal:  J Neurosurg Spine       Date:  2011-01-28

Review 2.  Clinical review: Spinal imaging for the adult obtunded blunt trauma patient: update from 2004.

Authors:  James O M Plumb; C G Morris
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 17.440

3.  Soft tissue injury protocol (STIP) using motion MRI for cervical spine trauma assessment.

Authors:  Vincenzo Giuliano; Concetta Giuliano; Fabio Pinto; Mariano Scaglione
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2004-03-19

4.  Cervical spine flexion patterns.

Authors:  S P Bohrer; Y M Chen; D G Sayers
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 2.199

5.  Advanced Multi-Axis Spine Testing: Clinical Relevance and Research Recommendations.

Authors:  Timothy P Holsgrove; Nikhil R Nayak; William C Welch; Beth A Winkelstein
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-07-17

6.  Cervical spine functional anatomy and the biomechanics of injury due to compressive loading.

Authors:  Erik E Swartz; R T Floyd; Mike Cendoma
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2005 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.860

7.  Risk of cervical injuries in mixed martial arts.

Authors:  T Kochhar; D L Back; B Mann; J Skinner
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 13.800

8.  In vivo measurement of translational stiffness of rabbit knees.

Authors:  Anneliese D Heiner; M James Rudert; Todd O McKinley; Douglas C Fredericks; John A Bobst; Yuki Tochigi
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-12-18       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  C1-C2 arthrodesis after transoral odontoidectomy and suboccipital craniectomy for ventral brain stem compression in Chiari I patients.

Authors:  Steven W Hwang; Carl B Heilman; Ron I Riesenburger; James Kryzanski
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Cervical spondylotic myelopathy and radiculopathy treated by oblique corpectomies without fusion.

Authors:  R Kemal Koç; Ahmet Menkü; Hidayet Akdemir; Bülent Tucer; Ali Kurtsoy; I Suat Oktem
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2004-07-28       Impact factor: 3.042

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.