| Literature DB >> 29372056 |
Glauber Sá Brandão1,2, Glaucia Sá Brandão Freitas Gomes2, Glaudson Sá Brandão3, Antônia A Callou Sampaio2, Claudio F Donner4, Luis V F Oliveira5, Aquiles Assunção Camelier1,6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Aging causes physiological changes which affect the quality of sleep. Supervised physical exercise is an important therapeutic resource to improve the sleep of the elderlies, however there is a low adherence to those type of programs, so it is necessary to implement an exercise program which is feasible and effective. The study aimed to test the hypothesis that a semi-supervised home exercise program, improves sleep quality and daytime sleepiness of elderlies of the community who present poor sleep quality.Entities:
Keywords: Community elderly; Exercise; Sleep
Year: 2018 PMID: 29372056 PMCID: PMC5767972 DOI: 10.1186/s40248-017-0114-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Multidiscip Respir Med ISSN: 1828-695X
Fig. 1Flowchart of the study
Baseline characteristics by group
| Variables | Control group ( | Intervention group ( |
|
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years) | 69.9 ± 6.7 | 69.8 ± 7.4 | 0.76 |
| Gender (% women) | 84.4 | 91.8 | 0.23 |
| BMI (Kg/m2) | 27.7 ± 4.7 | 27.6 ± 4.1 | 0.75 |
| Waist Circumference (cm) | 93 ± 10 | 93 ± 10 | 0.76 |
| Number of self-reported morbidities | 1.9 ± 1.4 | 1.8 ± 1.5 | 0.63 |
| Per capita income (% ≤ 2 minimum wages) | 82.3 | 85.7 | 0.86 |
| Education (% ≤ 3 years of study) | 75 | 75.9 | 0.54 |
| Housing (% live with relatives) | 67 | 71 | 0.85 |
| Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index | 11.4 ± 3 | 11 ± 3.4 | 0.55 |
| Epworth Sleepiness Scale | 8.5 ± 3 | 8.7 ± 3 | 0.14 |
| Berlin Questionnaire (% high risk) | 37 | 39 | 0.23 |
| Physical Activity – IPAQ (% actives) | 88 | 85 | 0.34 |
Data mean ± standard deviation or in (%); n = number of participants who completed the follow up. No significant difference was detected between groups (p > 0.05)
Fig. 2Comparison of quality of sleep (PSQI), before and after the intervention, in each group. T-test for paired samples
Delta of mean PSQI components related to pre- and post-intervention for each group and p of the difference
| Variables | Group | Basal moment | After 12 weeks of intervention | Delta | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subjective sleep quality | CG | 1.9 ± 0.7 | 1.8 ± 0.6 | 0.1 | 0.16 |
| IG | 1.8 ± 0.7 | 1.1 ± 0.6 | 0.7 | < 0.01 | |
| Sleep latency | CG | 2.0 ± 0.9 | 1.7 ± 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.08 |
| IG | 1.9 ± 1.0 | 1 ± 0.9 | 0.9 | <0.01 | |
| Duration of the sleep | CG | 1.9 ± 0.9 | 1.6 ± 0.8 | 0.3 | 0.11 |
| IG | 2.1 ± 1 | 1.2 ± 0.8 | 0.8 | <0.01 | |
| Usual sleep efficiency | CG | 2 ± 0.9 | 1.6 ± 1.1 | 0.4 | 0.06 |
| IG | 1.6 ± 1.0 | 0.7 ± 0.9 | 0.9 | <0.01 | |
| Sleep Disorders | CG | 2 ± 0.6 | 1.9 ± 0.7 | 0.1 | 0.41 |
| IG | 1.9 ± 0.6 | 1.2 ± 0.5 | 0.6 | <0.01 | |
| Use of sleeping medicines | CG | 0.3 ± 0.4 | 0.2 ± 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.32 |
| IG | 0.2 ± 0.4 | 0.1 ± 0.3 | 0.1 | 0.04 | |
| Dysfunction during the day | CG | 1.6 ± 1.2 | 1.7 ± 1 | −0.1 | 0.57 |
| IG | 1.7 ± 1.1 | 1.1 ± 0.8 | 0.6 | <0.01 |
Data mean ± standard deviation
*t-test for non-paired samples (p < 0.05)
Fig. 3Comparison of improving excessive daytime sleepiness (ESS), before and after the intervention in each group. T test for paired samples