| Literature DB >> 29369160 |
Thushan I de Silva1,2, Aleksandra Leligdowicz1,3, Jonathan Carlson4, Miguel Garcia-Knight5, Clayton Onyango1, Nicholas Miller3, Louis-Marie Yindom5, Stephane Hué6, Assan Jaye1, Tao Dong3, Matthew Cotten1, Sarah L Rowland-Jones5.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: HIV-1 frequently adapts in response to immune pressure from cytotoxic T-lymphocytes (CTL). Many HIV-2 infected individuals have robust capsid-specific CTL responses associated with viral control. Despite this CTL pressure, adaptive changes in this key immunogenic HIV-2 protein have not previously been described. We sought to compare selective pressure on HIV-1 and HIV-2 capsids and identify HLA-associated viral polymorphisms in HIV-2. DESIGN AND METHODS: Bioinformatic algorithms to identify sites under positive and negative selective pressure and a statistical model of evolution to identify HLA-associated polymorphisms in HIV-2 was applied to sequences from a community cohort in Guinea-Bissau. IFN-γ ELISpots were used to compare T-cell responses to wild-type and variant epitopes.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29369160 PMCID: PMC5895130 DOI: 10.1097/QAD.0000000000001753
Source DB: PubMed Journal: AIDS ISSN: 0269-9370 Impact factor: 4.177
Fig. 1Alignment of HIV-2 ROD (M15390) and HIV-1 HXB2 (K03455) capsid sequences highlighting amino acid positions under positive selection in the Caió population.
Potential sites of HLA-mediated selection pressure and codon evolution in HIV-2 p26 as predicted by a phylogenetic dependency network analysis.
| HIV-2 Gag codon | Amino acid | Direction | Predicted epitope around codon associated with relevant | Prediction probability (%) | |||
| 245 | D | B58_ST | Adapted | 0.0002 | 0.0684 | STV | 94 |
| 245 | E | B58_ST | Nonadapted | 6.73E-05 | 0.0309 | STV | 92 |
| 254 | A | B35 | Nonadapted | 0.0002 | 0.1030 | FR | 71 |
| 254 | P | B35 | Adapted | 0.0001 | 0.0336 | FR | 71 |
| 254 | P | C08 | Adapted | 8.89E-05 | 0.0336 | WMFR | 53 |
| 256 | V | A03_ST | Adapted | 0.000749 | 0.1721 | NP | 51 |
| 256 | I | A03_ST | Nonadapted | 0.000749 | 0.1721 | NP | 57 |
| 294 | S | C0401 | Nonadapted | 2.79E-07 | 0.0002 | E | 60 |
| 294 | P | C0401 | Adapted | 1.10E-07 | 8.32E-05 | E | 60 |
| 313 | A | B5801 | Adapted | 4.93E-08 | 5.66E-05 | QTD | 66 |
| 313 | P | B5801 | Nonadapted | 1.79E-10 | 4.11E-07 | QTD | 65 |
aST, SuperType (15).
bAdapted indicates that reported amino acid is the putative adaption at that site (i.e. ‘escaped’ variant). Nonadapted indicates that reported amino acid is putatively susceptible to escape (i.e. ‘reversion’).
cEstimation of false-discovery rate for each association, that is, q value of 0.05 = 5% false discovery rate.
dWherever codon is in flanking region, epitope is underlined. Codon is shown in bold. Epitope predictions are made by scanning the candidate sequence for peptide lengths of 8–11 amino acids. Only peptides within three amino acids of the associated codon are considered.
eThe 10-mer TSTVEEQIQW has been previously identified as a B58_ST-restricted epitope via functional assays. The prediction algorithm used identifies the 9-mer STVDEQIQW as an optimal B58_ST-restricted epitope.
fNPVPVGNIY is a known B35-restricted epitope.