Literature DB >> 29368030

Influence of family on expected benefits of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) in cancer patients.

Shelly Latte-Naor1, Robert Sidlow2, Lingyun Sun2, Qing S Li2, Jun J Mao2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cancer patients often use complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) based on recommendations from family. However, the relationship between family endorsement of CAM and the patient's expectation of its benefits has never been quantified.
METHODS: Between 2010 and 2011, we conducted a cross-sectional survey study among patients with a diagnosis of cancer recruited from thoracic, breast, and gastrointestinal medical oncology clinics at a single academic cancer center. We performed multivariate linear regression analyses to evaluate the relationship between perceived family endorsement of and expected benefits from CAM, adjusting for covariates.
RESULTS: Among the 962 participants, 303 (31.3%) reported family endorsement of CAM use. Younger patients and those who had college or higher education were more likely to report family endorsement (both p < 0.05). Patients with family support had expectation scores that were 15.9 higher than patients without family support (coefficient 15.9, 95% CI 13.5, 18.2, p < 0.001). Participants with family encouragement of CAM use were also more likely to expect CAM to cure their cancer (12 vs. 37%) and prolong their life (24 vs. 61%). These relationships remained highly significant after adjusting for covariates).
CONCLUSIONS: Family endorsement of CAM use is strongly associated with patient expectation of its clinical efficacy, including expectations for cure and improved survival. These findings underscore the importance of including family in counseling and education on CAM use in order to achieve realistic patient expectations, maximize benefits, and avoid potential medical adverse effects through herb-drug interactions or rejections of conventional care.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Alternative; CAM; Cancer; Complementary; Family support

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29368030      PMCID: PMC6387788          DOI: 10.1007/s00520-018-4053-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Support Care Cancer        ISSN: 0941-4355            Impact factor:   3.603


  23 in total

1.  High prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine use among cancer patients: implications for research and clinical care.

Authors:  Barrie R Cassileth; Andrew J Vickers
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Complementary and Alternative Medicine Use Among Patients With Cancer: A Challenge in the Oncologist-Patient Relationship.

Authors:  Robert Zachariae
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 31.777

3.  Why some cancer patients choose complementary and alternative medicine instead of conventional treatment.

Authors:  D M Shumay; G Maskarinec; H Kakai; C C Gotay
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 0.493

4.  Mindfulness meditation for younger breast cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Julienne E Bower; Alexandra D Crosswell; Annette L Stanton; Catherine M Crespi; Diana Winston; Jesusa Arevalo; Jeffrey Ma; Steve W Cole; Patricia A Ganz
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  Yoga and meditation for menopausal symptoms in breast cancer survivors-A randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Holger Cramer; Sybille Rabsilber; Romy Lauche; Sherko Kümmel; Gustav Dobos
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-03-04       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Understanding the motivation for conventional and complementary/alternative medicine use among men with prostate cancer.

Authors:  Harvir Singh; Gertraud Maskarinec; Dianne M Shumay
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 3.279

7.  Factors in making the decision to forgo conventional cancer treatment.

Authors:  Marja J Verhoef; Margaret A White
Journal:  Cancer Pract       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug

8.  Treat or treatment: a qualitative study analyzing patients' use of complementary and alternative medicine.

Authors:  Felicity L Bishop; Lucy Yardley; George T Lewith
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2008-01-02       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Communication between physicians and cancer patients about complementary and alternative medicine: exploring patients' perspectives.

Authors:  Katsuya Tasaki; Gertraud Maskarinec; Dianne M Shumay; Yvonne Tatsumura; Hisako Kakai
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.894

10.  Physician and patient attitudes towards complementary and alternative medicine in obstetrics and gynecology.

Authors:  Mandi L Furlow; Divya A Patel; Ananda Sen; J Rebecca Liu
Journal:  BMC Complement Altern Med       Date:  2008-06-26       Impact factor: 3.659

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Putting Integrative Oncology Into Practice: Concepts and Approaches.

Authors:  Shelly Latte-Naor; Jun J Mao
Journal:  J Oncol Pract       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 3.840

2.  [Sociodemographic profile of the homeopathy user in Spain].

Authors:  Lorena Cano-Orón; Isabel Mendoza-Poudereux; Carolina Moreno-Castro
Journal:  Aten Primaria       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 1.137

3.  Symptom burden and willingness to participate: implications for herbal clinical trials in lung cancer.

Authors:  Jie Liu; Wei Hou; Mithat Gönen; Christina Seluzicki; Susan Qing Li; Jun J Mao
Journal:  Ann Palliat Med       Date:  2020-12-17

4.  Addressing Unmet Information Needs: Results of a Clinician-Led Consultation Service About Complementary and Alternative Medicine for Cancer Patients and Their Relatives.

Authors:  Markus Horneber; Gerd van Ackeren; Felix Fischer; Herbert Kappauf; Josef Birkmann
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.279

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.