Literature DB >> 29367174

Dental age assessment: Which is the most applicable method?

Luciana Jácome Lopes1, Helena Aguiar Ribeiro Nascimento2, Giovanna Panebianchi Lima1, Luís Antônio Nogueira Dos Santos3, Dagmar de Paula Queluz1, Deborah Queiroz Freitas1.   

Abstract

To evaluate which method is the most applicable for estimating estimate dental age in Brazilian children, Nolla or Demirjian. For this purpose, both methods were reviewed and the differences between them brought to light. A total of 403 healthy children between the ages of 7 and 13 years with satisfactory panoramic radiographs, similar socio-economic background and ethnic origin were included. Panoramic radiographs were examined by the Nolla and Demirjian methods. Dental age was calculated for both methods, and the differences between the dental age and the chronological age were compared with analysis of variance with post hoc Dunnett. The Nolla method showed no significant difference in relation to chronological age in the majority of age groups for boys and girls, except for 12-year-old boys (over-estimation of 1.00) and between 11- and 12-year-old girls (over-estimation of 0.51 and 0.59, respectively). An over-estimation of the dental age was observed by using the Demirjian method (for boys 0.89-1.84 and for girls 0.69-1.97) for all age groups. The Nolla method is suitable for Brazilian children when it comes to age estimate with care to growth spurt beginning (around 11 and 12 years). However, the Dermijian method should not be used, because it over-estimated the age in both sexes.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Chronological age; Demirjian method; Dental age; Nolla method; Panoramic radiograph

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29367174     DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.12.044

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Forensic Sci Int        ISSN: 0379-0738            Impact factor:   2.395


  4 in total

1.  Differences in third molar development and angulation in class II subdivision malocclusions.

Authors:  Ezgi Sunal Akturk; Elif Dilara Seker; Sena Akman; Gokmen Kurt
Journal:  J Orofac Orthop       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 1.938

2.  Assessment of dental age estimation methods applied to Brazilian children: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ademir Franco; Murilo Navarro de Oliveira; Maria Tereza Campos Vidigal; Cauane Blumenberg; Adriele Alves Pinheiro; Luiz Renato Paranhos
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Analysis of interrater reliability in age assessment of minors: how does expertise influence the evaluation?

Authors:  Lorenzo Franceschetti; Vera Gloria Merelli; Susanna Corona; Francesca Magli; Lidia Maggioni; Marco Cummaudo; Stefania Tritella; Danilo De Angelis; Cristina Cattaneo
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2021-09-30       Impact factor: 2.686

4.  Accuracy assessment of dental age estimation with the Willems, Demirjian and Nolla methods in Spanish children: Comparative cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Marta Macarena Paz Cortés; Rosa Rojo; Esther Alía García; Maria Rosa Mourelle Martínez
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2020-07-31       Impact factor: 2.125

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.