Literature DB >> 29367057

Estrogen receptor α- (ERα), but not ERβ-signaling, is crucially involved in mechanostimulation of bone fracture healing by whole-body vibration.

Melanie Haffner-Luntzer1, Anna Kovtun2, Ina Lackner2, Yvonne Mödinger2, Steffen Hacker2, Astrid Liedert2, Jan Tuckermann3, Anita Ignatius2.   

Abstract

Mechanostimulation by low-magnitude high frequency vibration (LMHFV) has been shown to provoke anabolic effects on the intact skeleton in both mice and humans. However, experimental studies revealed that, during bone fracture healing, the effect of whole-body vibration is profoundly influenced by the estrogen status. LMHFV significantly improved fracture healing in ovariectomized (OVX) mice being estrogen deficient, whereas bone regeneration was significantly reduced in non-OVX, estrogen-competent mice. Furthermore, estrogen receptors α (ERα) and β (ERβ) were differentially expressed in the fracture callus after whole-body vibration, depending on the estrogen status. Based on these data, we hypothesized that ERs may mediate vibration-induced effects on fracture healing. To prove this hypothesis, we investigated the effects of LMHFV on bone healing in mice lacking ERα or ERβ. To study the influence of the ER ligand estrogen, both non-OVX and OVX mice were used. All mice received a femur osteotomy stabilized by an external fixator. Half of the mice were sham-operated or subjected to OVX 4 weeks before osteotomy. Half of each group received LMHFV with 0.3 g and 45 Hz for 20 min per day, 5 days per week. After 21 days, fracture healing was evaluated by biomechanical testing, μCT analysis, histomorphometry and immunohistochemistry. Absence of ERα or ERβ did not affect fracture healing in sham-treated mice. Wildtype (WT) and ERβ-knockout mice similarly displayed impaired bone regeneration after OVX, whereas ERα-knockout mice did not. Confirming previous data, in WT mice, LMHFV negatively affected bone repair in non-OVX mice, whereas OVX-induced compromised healing was significantly improved by vibration. In contrast, vibrated ERα-knockout mice did not display significant differences in fracture healing compared to non-vibrated animals, both in non-OVX and OVX mice. Fracture healing in ERβ-knockout mice was similarly affected by LMHFV as in WT mice. These results suggest that ERα-signaling may be crucial for vibration-induced effects on fracture healing, whereas ERβ-signaling may play a minor role.
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bone formation; Estrogen; Estrogen receptors; Fracture healing; Osteoblasts; Vibration

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29367057     DOI: 10.1016/j.bone.2018.01.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Bone        ISSN: 1873-2763            Impact factor:   4.398


  9 in total

Review 1.  A comprehensive review of mouse diaphyseal femur fracture models.

Authors:  Zachary J Gunderson; Zachery R Campbell; Todd O McKinley; Roman M Natoli; Melissa A Kacena
Journal:  Injury       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  Therapy-Induced Senescence Drives Bone Loss.

Authors:  Zhangting Yao; Bhavna Murali; Qihao Ren; Xianmin Luo; Douglas V Faget; Tom Cole; Biancamaria Ricci; Dinesh Thotala; Joseph Monahan; Jan M van Deursen; Darren Baker; Roberta Faccio; Julie K Schwarz; Sheila A Stewart
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2020-01-13       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 3.  Dysfunctional stem and progenitor cells impair fracture healing with age.

Authors:  Diane R Wagner; Sonali Karnik; Zachary J Gunderson; Jeffery J Nielsen; Alanna Fennimore; Hunter J Promer; Jonathan W Lowery; M Terry Loghmani; Philip S Low; Todd O McKinley; Melissa A Kacena; Matthias Clauss; Jiliang Li
Journal:  World J Stem Cells       Date:  2019-06-26       Impact factor: 5.326

4.  Effects of Estrogen Receptor and Wnt Signaling Activation on Mechanically Induced Bone Formation in a Mouse Model of Postmenopausal Bone Loss.

Authors:  Astrid Liedert; Claudia Nemitz; Melanie Haffner-Luntzer; Fabian Schick; Franz Jakob; Anita Ignatius
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 5.923

5.  Analysis of low-dose estrogen on callus BMD as measured by pQCT in postmenopausal women.

Authors:  K Jäckle; J P Kolb; A F Schilling; C Schlickewei; M Amling; J M Rueger; W Lehmann
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2020-10-19       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  Protective effects of low-magnitude high-frequency vibration on high glucose-induced osteoblast dysfunction and bone loss in diabetic rats.

Authors:  Zhaoyu Fu; Xu Huang; Pengcheng Zhou; Bo Wu; Long Cheng; Xinyu Wang; Dong Zhu
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2021-10-30       Impact factor: 2.359

Review 7.  Influence of Low-Magnitude High-Frequency Vibration on Bone Cells and Bone Regeneration.

Authors:  Lena Steppe; Astrid Liedert; Anita Ignatius; Melanie Haffner-Luntzer
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2020-10-21

Review 8.  Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: Identification, Classification, and Differentiation.

Authors:  Qianmin Gao; Lipeng Wang; Sicheng Wang; Biaotong Huang; Yingying Jing; Jiacan Su
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2022-01-03

9.  Estrogen Receptor α Signaling in Osteoblasts is Required for Mechanotransduction in Bone Fracture Healing.

Authors:  Lena Steppe; Benjamin Thilo Krüger; Miriam Eva Angelica Tschaffon; Verena Fischer; Jan Tuckermann; Anita Ignatius; Melanie Haffner-Luntzer
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2021-12-07
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.