| Literature DB >> 29364381 |
Sergei Godeiro Fernandes Rabelo Caldas1, Renato Parsekian Martins2,3, Marcela Emílio de Araújo1, Marília Regalado Galvão1, Roberto Soares da Silva Júnior2, Lídia Parsekian Martins4.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Evaluate changes in the force system of T-Loop Springs (TLS) preactivated by curvature, due to stress relaxation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29364381 PMCID: PMC5784818 DOI: 10.1590/2177-6709.22.6.061-067.oar
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dental Press J Orthod ISSN: 2176-9451
Figure 1A) TLS in passive form. B) TLS preactivated by gradual curvature. C) TLS engaged to brackets (loaded in an opposite direction to the preactivation).
Figure 2Template developed in the Loop software (dHAL Orthodontic Software, Athens, Greece) used to preactivate the TLS. The software allows the template to be printed in 1:1 ratio (each square measures 1 mm2).
Figure 4Chart depicting the average forces produced during deactivation from 5 to 0.5 mm for the groups tested.
Multivariate profiles test significance for force (F), moment (M) and M/F variables.
| Variable | Force | Moment | M/F |
|
|
|
| |
| Time | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.532 |
| Deactivation | < 0.001 | < 0.001 | 0.124 |
| Deactivation x Time | 0.006 | 0.048 | 0.159 |
General profiles means and standard deviations for forces and moments within groups.
| Group | Force | Moment | M/F | |||
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
| Group 1 | 228.4 A | 115.1 | 1941.0 A | 272.9 | 12.7 | 13.3 |
| Group 2 | 197.3 AB | 112.8 | 1919.9 A | 336.8 | -5.8 | 180.1 |
| Group 3 | 191.4 AB | 110.3 | 1922.0 A | 301.9 | 17.3 | 42.3 |
| Group 4 | 184.5 B | 107.4 | 1912.9 A | 317.5 | 3.7 | 100.2 |
| Group 5 | 185.9 B | 109.7 | 1840.7 A | 286 | 20.9 | 61.7 |
| Group 6 | 189.9 B | 110.9 | 1775.4 A | 288.9 | 24.8 | 90.8 |
| Group 7 | 167.8 BC | 112.9 | 1713.3 AB | 286.7 | 13.3 | 40.2 |
| Group 8 | 161.4 BC | 110.1 | 1506.8 B | 287.8 | -3.5 | 245.3 |
| Group 9 | 143.7 C | 112.2 | 1486.4 B | 256 | 18.8 | 49 |
Different superscript letters indicate group differences.
Means and standard deviations for the overlapping of the vertical extensions of the TLSs and L/D ratio.
| Group | Neutral Position* (mm) | L/D** (gf/0.5mm)# | ||
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | |
| Group 1 | -0.18 A | 0.31 | 78.1 A | 3.8 |
| Group 2 | 0.11 AB | 0.53 | 75.5 AB | 4.4 |
| Group 3 | 0.18 AB | 0.29 | 74.3 AB | 3.4 |
| Group 4 | 0.19 AB | 0.34 | 72.2 B | 3.6 |
| Group 5 | 0.17 AB | 0.45 | 72.1 B | 3.2 |
| Group 6 | 0.23 AB | 0.26 | 75.5 AB | 3.4 |
| Group 7 | 0.54 BC | 0.32 | 76.1 AB | 3.0 |
| Group 8 | 0.59 BC | 0.22 | 74.7 AB | 2.9 |
| Group 9 | 0.85 C | 0.29 | 75.7 AB | 3.9 |
*p < 0.001. **p = 0.008. # in order to acquire the L/D per mm, multiply the values times 2. Different superscript letters indicate group differences.
Figure 5Chart depicting the average moments produced during deactivation from 5 to 0.5 mm for the groups tested.
Figure 6Chart depicting the average M/F ratios produced during deactivation from 5 to 0.5 mm for the groups tested.
ANOVA and post-hoc Tukey test to identify which angle (according to Fig 7) suffers a deformation due to time.
| Angle (Fig. 7) | Neutral Position Group 1 | Post Period Group 4 | Post Period Group 9 | p | |||
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||
| 1 | 20.65 | 2.42 | 20.85 | 2.28 | 20.60 | 2.66 | 0.097 |
| 2 | 20.21 | 2.01 | 21.65 | 2.82 | 23.13 | 2.95 | 0.063 |
| 3 | 92.10 | 2.98 | 92.34 | 2.55 | 92.69 | 1.48 | 0.864 |
| 4 | 92.60 | 2.26 | 94.38 | 3.10 | 94.32 | 2.16 | 0.226 |
| 5 | 60.37 | 4.39 A | 74.74 | 4.88 B | 73.11 | 8.29 B | <0.001 |
| 6 | 64.66 | 3.88 A | 71.47 | 4.20 B | 79.46 | 5.48 C | <0.001 |
| 7 | 87.00 | 5.30 A | 107.85 | 14.93 B | 113.24 | 12.26 B | <0.001 |
Different superscript letters indicate group differences.
Figure 7TLSs structural angles measured for finding the deformation location. The angle 7 is formed by the intersection of horizontal extremities of the TLS.