| Literature DB >> 29364380 |
Carla Y Kong-Zárate1, Marcos J Carruitero2, Will A Andrews3.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purposes of this investigation were to determine the horizontal distances between the mandibular posterior teeth and the WALA ridge in a sample of Peruvians with normal occlusion and to compare them by tooth type, sex, arch side, and age groups.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 29364380 PMCID: PMC5784817 DOI: 10.1590/2177-6709.22.6.056-060.oar
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dental Press J Orthod ISSN: 2176-9451
Figure 1Measurements performed on casts showing the parallel position of the modified digital caliper to the occlusal plane. Pencil lines were drawn on the WALA ridge in the region of the four mandibular posterior teeth.
Figure 2A) Modified digital caliper. B) Closer view of the main part of the modified caliper.
Errors in the methods for FA-WALA ridge distances in mm (n=10).
| Side | Mandibular posterior tooth | Calibration | |||
| Inter-evaluator | Intra-evaluator | ||||
| CCC | P | CCC | p | ||
| Left | First premolar | 0.831 | <0.001 | 0.839 | <0.001 |
| Second premolar | 0.921 | <0.001 | 0.961 | <0.001 | |
| First molar | 0.836 | <0.001 | 0.960 | <0.001 | |
| Second molar | 0.871 | <0.001 | 0.894 | <0.001 | |
| Right | First premolar | 0.939 | <0.001 | 0.849 | <0.001 |
| Second premolar | 0.896 | <0.001 | 0.887 | <0.001 | |
| First molar | 0.891 | <0.001 | 0.901 | <0.001 | |
| Second molar | 0.806 | <0.001 | 0.853 | <0.001 | |
CCC, Concordance correlation coefficient.
Comparison of FA-WALA ridge distances (mm) in the Peruvian sample by sex, arch side and age groups.
| Tooth | Sex | Arch side | Age (in years) | ||||||||||||
| Female (n=28) | Male (n=37) | p* | Left (n=65) | Right (n=65) | p** | 13-17 (n=20) | 18-25 (n=45) | p* | |||||||
|
| SD |
| SD |
| SD |
| SD |
| SD |
| SD | ||||
| 1st premolar | 0.92 | 0.38 | 0.99 | 0.35 | 0.139 | 0.94 | 0.36 | 0.97 | 0.38 | 0.322 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.94 | 0.36 | 0.239 |
| 2nd premolar | 1.40 | 0.46 | 1.49 | 0.55 | 0.162 | 1.40 | 0.50 | 1.50 | 0.52 | 0.133 | 1.46 | 0.63 | 1.44 | 0.45 | 0.419 |
| 1st molar | 2.04 | 0.57 | 2.18 | 0.61 | 0.093 | 2.04 | 0.59 | 2.20 | 0.59 | 0.062 | 2.20 | 0.68 | 2.09 | 0.55 | 0.165 |
| 2nd molar | 2.49 | 0.61 | 2.58 | 0.60 | 0.201 | 2.64 | 0.56 | 2.47 | 0.66 | 0.058 | 2.56 | 0.65 | 2.55 | 0.61 | 0.337 |
* Student’s t-test for independent groups; ** Student’s t-test for relates groups; , mean; SD, standard deviation.
FA-WALA ridge distances (mm) in the Peruvian sample.
| Tooth | n | Mean‡ | SD | Minimum | Maximum |
| First premolar | 65 | 0.96 | 0.37 | 0.22 | 2.10 |
| Second premolar | 65 | 1.45 | 0.51 | 0.34 | 2.80 |
| First molar | 65 | 2.12 | 0.59 | 0.75 | 3.50 |
| Second molar | 65 | 2.55 | 0.62 | 1.02 | 3.95 |
‡General comparison by tooth type with ANOVA of repeated measures, F=229.72, p<0.001; post-hoc with Scheffe: p<0.001 to all comparisons; SD, standard deviation.
Figure 3Representation of the individualized archwire (green line) constructed using the WALA ridge from the initial casts (red lines) and the FA-WALA ridge average distances (yellow lines).