Literature DB >> 21457837

Subjective classification and objective analysis of the mandibular dental-arch form of orthodontic patients.

Kazuhito Arai1, Leslie A Will.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Our objective was to evaluate the relationship between subjective classification of dental-arch shape, objective analyses via arch-width measurements, and the fitting with the fourth-order polynomial equation.
METHODS: Twenty-seven pretreatment mandibular dental casts (from 13 males and 14 females; ages, 12-31 years) were selected. Standardized photographs of the arches were serially organized from tapered to square by 10 examiners. The mean position in the ranking of each cast was calculated as a rank of each arch form. The dental casts were analyzed with a 3-dimensional laser scanning system. Dental-arch widths at the canines and molars were measured, and then a fourth-order polynomial equation was fit to each arch. Correlations between the rank of arch shape and the objective measurements were statistically tested.
RESULTS: The arch forms having the greatest variations among the examiners were those with an intermediate (ovoid) ranking. Statistically significant correlations were found between the ranks of arch shape, arch dimensions, and the polynomial equation analyses.
CONCLUSIONS: Subjective clinical assessments were generally in agreement at the extremes of tapered and square arch forms; the exceptions were arches with an ovoid shape. There were statistically significant correlations between subjective dental-arch classifications and dental-arch dimensions, as well as the ratio determined from these variables and polynomial equation analyses. Therefore, fourth-order polynomial equations might be an important factor in the quantitative analysis of dental-arch form in orthodontic patients.
Copyright © 2011 American Association of Orthodontists. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21457837     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.12.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop        ISSN: 0889-5406            Impact factor:   2.650


  5 in total

1.  Agreement of the clinician's choice of archwire selection on conventional and virtual models.

Authors:  Sahar Haddadpour; Saeed Reza Motamedian; Mohammad Behnaz; Sohrab Asefi; Alireza Akbarzadeh Bagheban; Amir Hossein Abdi; Mahtab Nouri
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  The relationship between tooth size discrepancy and archform classification in orthodontic patients.

Authors:  Gerard O'Mahony; Declan T Millett; Michael S Cronin; Grant T McIntyre; Mark K Barry
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2015-04-01

3.  Is arch form influenced by sagittal molar relationship or Bolton tooth-size discrepancy?

Authors:  Abdullah M Aldrees; Abdulmajeed M Al-Shujaa; Mohammad A Alqahtani; Ali S Aljhani
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 2.757

4.  Distances between mandibular posterior teeth and the WALA ridge in Peruvians with normal occlusion.

Authors:  Carla Y Kong-Zárate; Marcos J Carruitero; Will A Andrews
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec

5.  Impact of the prefabricated forms of NiTi archwires on orthodontic forces delivered to the mandibular dental arch.

Authors:  Akihiko Tachi; Keisuke Tochigi; Naomi Saze; Kazuhito Arai
Journal:  Prog Orthod       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.750

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.