Literature DB >> 29364010

The Patient Concerns Inventory integrated as part of routine head and neck cancer follow-up consultations: frequency, case-mix, and items initiated by the patient.

S N Rogers1,2, F Thomson2, D Lowe1,2.   

Abstract

Introduction The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guidance Improving Supportive and Palliative Care for Adults with Cancer (2004) and the Cancer Reform Strategy (2007) support the premise that assessment and discussion of patients' needs for physical, social, psychological, and spiritual wellbeing should be undertaken during oncology follow-up. We report the use of the Patient Concerns Inventory in a routine head and neck cancer clinic setting over a seven-year period, summarising the number of available clinics, the number of patients completing the inventory within a clinic, the range of clinical characteristics and the concerns they wanted to discuss. Methods The data were analysed from oncology follow-up clinics between 1 August 2007 and 10 December 2014. Audit approval was given by the Clinical Audit Department, University Hospital Aintree. Results There were 386 patients with 1198 inventories completed at 220 clinics, median 6 (range 4-7) per clinic. The most common concerns raised by patients across all the clinic consultations were dry mouth (34%), fear of recurrence (33%), sore mouth (26%), dental health (25%), chewing (22%) and fatigue/tiredness (21%). Conclusions The incorporation of the Patient Concerns Inventory as part of routine oncology clinics allows for a more patient initiated and focused consultation available to the majority of patients throughout their follow-up. The inventory allows for greater opportunity to provide holistic targeted multiprofessional intervention and support.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Health-related quality of life; Holistic needs assessment; Oral cancer; Patient Concerns Inventory; Patient reported outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29364010      PMCID: PMC5930095          DOI: 10.1308/rcsann.2017.0215

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  13 in total

Review 1.  One size doesn't fit all: time to revisit patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in paediatric ophthalmology?

Authors:  V Tadić; J S Rahi
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2017-01-13       Impact factor: 3.775

Review 2.  A review of question prompt lists used in the oncology setting with comparison to the Patient Concerns Inventory.

Authors:  N Miller; S N Rogers
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 2.520

Review 3.  A systematic review of patient reported outcomes and patient experience in enhanced recovery after orthopaedic surgery.

Authors:  E L Jones; T W Wainwright; J D Foster; J R A Smith; R G Middleton; N K Francis
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 4.  Patient-reported outcomes in routine cancer clinical practice: a scoping review of use, impact on health outcomes, and implementation factors.

Authors:  D Howell; S Molloy; K Wilkinson; E Green; K Orchard; K Wang; J Liberty
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Screening for dysfunction to promote multidisciplinary intervention by using the University of Washington Quality of Life Questionnaire.

Authors:  Simon N Rogers; Derek Lowe
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2009-04

6.  The addition of mood and anxiety domains to the University of Washington quality of life scale.

Authors:  Simon N Rogers; Suzanne Gwanne; Derek Lowe; Gerry Humphris; Beven Yueh; Ernest A Weymuller
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 3.147

7.  Integrated care pathways for cancer survivors - a role for patient-reported outcome measures and health informatics.

Authors:  Lorraine Warrington; Kate Absolom; Galina Velikova
Journal:  Acta Oncol       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 4.089

8.  Enhanced patient reported outcome measurement suitable for head and neck cancer follow-up clinics.

Authors:  Naseem Ghazali; Derek Lowe; Simon N Rogers
Journal:  Head Neck Oncol       Date:  2012-06-13

9.  Quality of life considerations in head and neck cancer: United Kingdom National Multidisciplinary Guidelines.

Authors:  S N Rogers; C Semple; M Babb; G Humphris
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.469

10.  Surgeon's experiences of receiving peer benchmarked feedback using patient-reported outcome measures: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Maria B Boyce; John P Browne; Joanne Greenhalgh
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2014-06-27       Impact factor: 7.327

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  The Patient Concerns Inventory in head and neck oncology: a structured review of its development, validation and clinical implications.

Authors:  Anastasios Kanatas; Derek Lowe; Simon N Rogers
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2022-07-17       Impact factor: 3.236

2.  Improving quality of life through the routine use of the patient concerns inventory for head and neck cancer patients: baseline results in a cluster preference randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Simon N Rogers; Christine Allmark; Fazilet Bekiroglu; Rhiannon Tudor Edwards; Gillon Fabbroni; Robert Flavel; Victoria Highet; Michael W S Ho; Gerald M Humphris; Terry M Jones; Owais Khattak; Jeffrey Lancaster; Christopher Loh; Derek Lowe; Cher Lowies; Dominic Macareavy; James Moor; T K Ong; A Prasai; Nicholas Roland; Cherith Semple; Llinos Haf Spencer; Sank Tandon; Steven J Thomas; Andrew Schache; Richard J Shaw; Anastasios Kanatas
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Which Head and Neck Cancer Patients Are Most at Risk of High Levels of Fear of Cancer Recurrence.

Authors:  Simon N Rogers; Camilla Monssen; Gerald M Humphris; Derek Lowe; Anastasios Kanatas
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2021-07-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.