Literature DB >> 25751758

Integrated care pathways for cancer survivors - a role for patient-reported outcome measures and health informatics.

Lorraine Warrington1, Kate Absolom, Galina Velikova.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Modern cancer treatments have improved survival rates and changed the nature of cancer care. The acute and long-term physical and psychosocial comorbidities associated with treatment place increasing demands on healthcare services to provide suitable models of follow-up care for the survivor population. AIM: We discuss the value and challenges of incorporating patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and eHealth interventions into routine follow-up care. We draw on our 15 years' experience of developing electronic systems for capturing patient-reported data in oncology settings, with particular reference to eRAPID a new online symptom reporting system for cancer patients. THE REDESIGN OF HEALTHCARE PATHWAYS: New stratified care pathways have been proposed for cancer survivors with an emphasis on supported self-management and shared care. THE POTENTIAL ROLE OF PROMS IN SURVIVORSHIP CARE PATHWAYS: PROMs can be used to evaluate rehabilitation services, provide epidemiological 'Big Data' and screen patients for physical and psychological morbidities to determine the need for further support. In addition, electronic PROMs systems linked to electronic patient records (EPRs) have the capability to provide tailored self-management advice to individual patients. INTEGRATION OF PROMS INTO CLINICAL PRACTICE: The successful clinical utilisation of PROMs is dependent on a number of components including; choosing appropriate questionnaires, developing evidence-based scoring algorithms, the creation of robust electronic platforms for recording and transferring data into EPRs, and training staff and patients to engage effectively with PROMs. DISCUSSION: There is increasingly positive evidence for using PROMs and eHealth approaches to support cancer patients' care during treatment. Much of what has been learnt can be applied to cancer survivorship. PROMs integrated into eHealth platforms and with EPR have the potential to play a valuable role in the development of appropriate and sustainable long-term follow-up models for cancer survivors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25751758     DOI: 10.3109/0284186X.2014.995778

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Oncol        ISSN: 0284-186X            Impact factor:   4.089


  26 in total

1.  Cluster Analysis Demonstrates the Need to Individualize Care for Cancer Survivors.

Authors:  Belle H de Rooij; Elyse R Park; Giselle K Perez; Julia Rabin; Katharine M Quain; Don S Dizon; Kathryn E Post; Garrett M Chinn; Allison L McDonough; Rachel B Jimenez; Lonneke V van de Poll-Franse; Jeffrey Peppercorn
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2018-05-08

2.  The Patient Concerns Inventory integrated as part of routine head and neck cancer follow-up consultations: frequency, case-mix, and items initiated by the patient.

Authors:  S N Rogers; F Thomson; D Lowe
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2018-01-24       Impact factor: 1.891

3.  Symptom and function profiles of men with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Bryce B Reeve; Xianming Tan; Ronald C Chen; Deborah S Usinger; Laura C Pinheiro
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 6.860

4.  Patient reported outcomes following video assisted thoracoscopic (VATS) resection or stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) for treatment of non-small cell lung cancer: protocol for an observational pilot study (LiLAC).

Authors:  Cecilia Pompili; Kevin N Franks; Alessandro Brunelli; Yusuf S Hussain; Patricia Holch; Matthew E Callister; Jonathan M Robson; Kostas Papagiannopoulos; Galina Velikova
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 2.895

5.  Experiences with late effects-related care and preferences for long-term follow-up care among adult survivors of childhood lymphoma.

Authors:  Hanne C Lie; Anneli V Mellblom; Mette Brekke; Arnstein Finset; Sophie D Fosså; Cecilie E Kiserud; Ellen Ruud; Jon H Loge
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2017-02-24       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  PRO-ONKO-selection of patient-reported outcome assessments for the clinical use in cancer patients-a mixed-method multicenter cross-sectional exploratory study.

Authors:  Heike Schmidt; Daniela Merkel; Michael Koehler; Hans-Henning Flechtner; Jörg Sigle; Bernd Klinge; Karin Jordan; Dirk Vordermark; Margarete Landenberger; Patrick Jahn
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  European Society of Thoracic Surgeons electronic quality of life application after lung resection: field testing in a clinical setting.

Authors:  Cecilia Pompili; Jason Trevis; Miriam Patella; Alessandro Brunelli; Lidia Libretti; Nuria Novoa; Marco Scarci; Sara Tenconi; Joel Dunning; Stefano Cafarotti; Michael Koller; Galina Velikova; Yaron Shargall; Federico Raveglia
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2021-05-27

8.  Reflections on the national patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) programme: Where do we go from here?

Authors:  Derek Kyte; Paul Cockwell; Mauro Lencioni; Magdalena Skrybant; Maria von Hildebrand; Gary Price; Katie Squire; Shena Webb; Olivia Brookes; Hilary Fanning; Tim Jones; Melanie Calvert
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  AmbuFlex: tele-patient-reported outcomes (telePRO) as the basis for follow-up in chronic and malignant diseases.

Authors:  Liv Marit Valen Schougaard; Louise Pape Larsen; Anne Jessen; Per Sidenius; Liv Dorflinger; Annette de Thurah; Niels Henrik Hjollund
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Collecting, Integrating, and Disseminating Patient-Reported Outcomes for Research in a Learning Healthcare System.

Authors:  Christopher A Harle; Gloria Lipori; Robert W Hurley
Journal:  EGEMS (Wash DC)       Date:  2016-07-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.