Literature DB >> 29363769

Characterization methods for comprehensive evaluations of shielding materials used in an MRI.

Nicolas Gross-Weege1, Thomas Dey1, Pierre Gebhardt1, David Schug1, Bjoern Weissler1, Volkmar Schulz1,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In order to integrate electronic devices into a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scanner, shielding of the electronics with respect to the radio frequency (RF) transmit and receive system of the MRI scanner is required. Furthermore, MRI uses time-varying low-frequency magnetic fields for spatial encoding, i.e., the gradient magnetic fields. Time-varying magnetic fields induce eddy currents in all conductive elements. The eddy currents result in opposing magnetic fields, which can cause distortions of the magnetic resonance (MR) image. As shielding of lower frequencies is not feasible in this respect, an ideal shielding element should be transparent for gradient magnetic fields while providing a high RF shielding effectiveness. Furthermore, it should offer a low susceptibility to prevent distortion of the main magnetic field of the MRI. In this work, we characterize the aforesaid shielding parameters of different shielding samples.
METHODS: We developed a nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) probe to measure the magnetic fields to quantify the field distortions time-resolvedly. The relative distortion was introduced as a proportionality constant relating the eddy-current-inducing field changes and the field distortions. The relative distortion was measured in the frequency range from 0 to 10 kHz for all shielding samples using the NMR probe. We characterized the shielding effectiveness of the samples in the frequency range from 1 to 150 MHz using a network analyzer. We conducted all measurements with three different materials, two carbon fiber composites and copper, each in various thicknesses.
RESULTS: The relative distortion of the magnetic fields induced by the carbon fiber composites samples was at least a factor of seven lower than the copper sample. A linear dependency on the sample thickness was measured for the main field distortion, the relative distortion and the shielding effectiveness. The relative distortion was roughly independent of the gradient frequency contrary to the shielding effectiveness, highly depending on the RF frequency.
CONCLUSIONS: We presented a very sensitive method to characterize the distortion of the main field distortion and the gradient transparency using an NMR probe. We analyzed different shielding materials regarding the main field distortion, the gradient transparency, and the shielding effectiveness. From the tested materials, we identified a carbon fiber composite with the lowest distortion on the MRI.
© 2018 The Authors. Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MRI; PET-MRI; gradient transparency; image artifacts; shielding

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29363769     DOI: 10.1002/mp.12762

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  4 in total

1.  MR Performance in the Presence of a Radio Frequency-Penetrable Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Insert for Simultaneous PET/MRI.

Authors:  Brian J Lee; Alexander M Grant; Chen-Ming Chang; Ronald D Watkins; Gary H Glover; Craig S Levin
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2018-03-13       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  Evaluation of the radiofrequency performance of a wide-bore 1.5 T positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging body coil for radiotherapy planning.

Authors:  Woutjan Branderhorst; Bart R Steensma; Casper Beijst; Erik R Huijing; Cezar Alborahal; Edwin Versteeg; Bjoern Weissler; David Schug; Pierre Gebhardt; Nicolas Gross-Weege; Florian Mueller; Karl Krueger; Thomas Dey; Harald Radermacher; Oliver Lips; Jan Lagendijk; Volkmar Schulz; Hugo W A M de Jong; Dennis W J Klomp
Journal:  Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol       Date:  2020-12-23

Review 3.  Hybrid total-body pet scanners-current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Vanessa Nadig; Ken Herrmann; Felix M Mottaghy; Volkmar Schulz
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2021-10-14       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Shielding a high-sensitivity digital detector from electromagnetic interference.

Authors:  David E Hintenlang; Xia Jiang; Kevin J Little
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 2.102

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.