Literature DB >> 29363577

The arrestin-1 finger loop interacts with two distinct conformations of active rhodopsin.

Matthias Elgeti1, Roman Kazmin2, Alexander S Rose2,3, Michal Szczepek2,4, Peter W Hildebrand2,5, Franz J Bartl2,6, Patrick Scheerer2,4, Klaus Peter Hofmann2.   

Abstract

Signaling of the prototypical G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) rhodopsin through its cognate G protein transducin (Gt) is quenched when arrestin binds to the activated receptor. Although the overall architecture of the rhodopsin/arrestin complex is known, many questions regarding its specificity remain unresolved. Here, using FTIR difference spectroscopy and a dual pH/peptide titration assay, we show that rhodopsin maintains certain flexibility upon binding the "finger loop" of visual arrestin (prepared as synthetic peptide ArrFL-1). We found that two distinct complexes can be stabilized depending on the protonation state of E3.49 in the conserved (D)ERY motif. Both complexes exhibit different interaction modes and affinities of ArrFL-1 binding. The plasticity of the receptor within the rhodopsin/ArrFL-1 complex stands in contrast to the complex with the C terminus of the Gt α-subunit (GαCT), which stabilizes only one specific substate out of the conformational ensemble. However, Gt α-subunit binding and both ArrFL-1-binding modes involve a direct interaction to conserved R3.50, as determined by site-directed mutagenesis. Our findings highlight the importance of receptor conformational flexibility and cytoplasmic proton uptake for modulation of rhodopsin signaling and thereby extend the picture provided by crystal structures of the rhodopsin/arrestin and rhodopsin/ArrFL-1 complexes. Furthermore, the two binding modes of ArrFL-1 identified here involve motifs of conserved amino acids, which indicates that our results may have elucidated a common modulation mechanism of class A GPCR-G protein/-arrestin signaling.
© 2018 by The American Society for Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Fourier transform IR (FTIR); G protein; G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR); arrestin; biased signaling; functional selectivity; rhodopsin

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29363577      PMCID: PMC5868258          DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M117.817890

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  51 in total

1.  Signaling states of rhodopsin. Retinal provides a scaffold for activating proton transfer switches.

Authors:  C K Meyer; M Bohme; A Ockenfels; W Gartner; K P Hofmann; O P Ernst
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2000-06-30       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Spectroscopic evidence for interaction between transmembrane helices 3 and 5 in rhodopsin.

Authors:  M Beck; T P Sakmar; F Siebert
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1998-05-19       Impact factor: 3.162

3.  Crystal structure of the ligand-free G-protein-coupled receptor opsin.

Authors:  Jung Hee Park; Patrick Scheerer; Klaus Peter Hofmann; Hui-Woog Choe; Oliver Peter Ernst
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2008-06-18       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Helix formation in arrestin accompanies recognition of photoactivated rhodopsin.

Authors:  Sophie E Feuerstein; Alexander Pulvermüller; Rudolf Hartmann; Joachim Granzin; Matthias Stoldt; Peter Henklein; Oliver P Ernst; Martin Heck; Dieter Willbold; Bernd W Koenig
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2009-11-17       Impact factor: 3.162

5.  Functional differences in the interaction of arrestin and its splice variant, p44, with rhodopsin.

Authors:  A Pulvermüller; D Maretzki; M Rudnicka-Nawrot; W C Smith; K Palczewski; K P Hofmann
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1997-07-29       Impact factor: 3.162

6.  Constitutive activation of opsin by mutation of methionine 257 on transmembrane helix 6.

Authors:  M Han; S O Smith; T P Sakmar
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1998-06-02       Impact factor: 3.162

7.  Two different forms of metarhodopsin II: Schiff base deprotonation precedes proton uptake and signaling state.

Authors:  S Arnis; K P Hofmann
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-08-15       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  The dynamic process of β(2)-adrenergic receptor activation.

Authors:  Rie Nygaard; Yaozhong Zou; Ron O Dror; Thomas J Mildorf; Daniel H Arlow; Aashish Manglik; Albert C Pan; Corey W Liu; Juan José Fung; Michael P Bokoch; Foon Sun Thian; Tong Sun Kobilka; David E Shaw; Luciano Mueller; R Scott Prosser; Brian K Kobilka
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2013-01-31       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 9.  The role of protein dynamics in GPCR function: insights from the β2AR and rhodopsin.

Authors:  Aashish Manglik; Brian Kobilka
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2014-02-17       Impact factor: 8.382

10.  Crystal structure of the β2 adrenergic receptor-Gs protein complex.

Authors:  Søren G F Rasmussen; Brian T DeVree; Yaozhong Zou; Andrew C Kruse; Ka Young Chung; Tong Sun Kobilka; Foon Sun Thian; Pil Seok Chae; Els Pardon; Diane Calinski; Jesper M Mathiesen; Syed T A Shah; Joseph A Lyons; Martin Caffrey; Samuel H Gellman; Jan Steyaert; Georgios Skiniotis; William I Weis; Roger K Sunahara; Brian K Kobilka
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 49.962

View more
  4 in total

1.  Angiotensin Analogs with Divergent Bias Stabilize Distinct Receptor Conformations.

Authors:  Laura M Wingler; Matthias Elgeti; Daniel Hilger; Naomi R Latorraca; Michael T Lerch; Dean P Staus; Ron O Dror; Brian K Kobilka; Wayne L Hubbell; Robert J Lefkowitz
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2019-01-10       Impact factor: 41.582

2.  Structural studies of phosphorylation-dependent interactions between the V2R receptor and arrestin-2.

Authors:  Qing-Tao He; Peng Xiao; Shen-Ming Huang; Ying-Li Jia; Zhong-Liang Zhu; Jing-Yu Lin; Fan Yang; Xiao-Na Tao; Ru-Jia Zhao; Feng-Yuan Gao; Xiao-Gang Niu; Kun-Hong Xiao; Jiangyun Wang; Changwen Jin; Jin-Peng Sun; Xiao Yu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-04-22       Impact factor: 14.919

3.  Structural Insights into β-arrestin/CB1 Receptor Interaction: NMR and CD Studies on Model Peptides.

Authors:  Paula Morales; Marta Bruix; M Angeles Jiménez
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2020-10-30       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 4.  DEER Analysis of GPCR Conformational Heterogeneity.

Authors:  Matthias Elgeti; Wayne L Hubbell
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-05-22
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.