Literature DB >> 29362963

Prognostic Value of Exon 19 Versus 21 EGFR Mutations Varies According to Disease Stage in Surgically Resected Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Adenocarcinoma.

Stéphane Renaud1, Joseph Seitlinger2, Francesco Guerrera3, Jérémie Reeb2, Michèle Beau-Faller4, Anne-Claire Voegeli4, Joelle Siat5, Christelle Clément-Duchêne6, Angelica Tiotiu7, Nicola Santelmo2, Lorena Costardi3, Enrico Ruffini3, Pierre-Emmanuel Falcoz2, Jean-Michel Vignaud8, Gilbert Massard2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of exon 19 and 21 EGFR mutations in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is well established.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of the mutations in surgically resected NSCLC.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed data from 1798 surgically resected NSCLC adenocarcinomas between 2007 and 2017 in three departments of thoracic surgery (Nancy/Strasbourg, France, and Torino, Italy) for whom mutational status was known. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated using log-rank and Cox proportional hazard models.
RESULTS: EGFR exon 19 deletion was observed in 108 patients (55.1%) and exon 21 L858R mutations were observed in 88 patients (44.9%). In stage I, the median OS was not significantly different between exons 19 and 21 (p = 0.54), while, in stage II, the median OS reached 65 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 41.67-88.33] for exon 19 mutations and decreased to 48 months for exon 21 mutations (95% CI 44.21-51.79; p = 0.027). In multivariate analysis, exon 19 deletion remained a favorable prognostic factor [hazard ratio (HR) 0.314, 95% CI 0.098-0.997; p = 0.05]. In stage III, the median OS reached 66 months (95% CI 44.67-87.32) for exon 19 mutations and decreased to 32 months for exon 21 mutations (95% CI 29.86-34.14; p = 0.03). In multivariate analysis, exon 19 deletion remained a significantly favorable prognostic factor (HR 0.165, 95% CI 0.027-0.999; p = 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The prognostic value of EGFR exon 19 and 21 mutations appears to be different according to disease stage in surgically resected NSCLC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29362963     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-018-6347-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  6 in total

1.  First-Generation EGFR-TKI Plus Chemotherapy Versus EGFR-TKI Alone as First-Line Treatment in Advanced NSCLC With EGFR Activating Mutation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Authors:  Qiang Wu; Wuxia Luo; Wen Li; Ting Wang; Lin Huang; Feng Xu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2021-04-13       Impact factor: 6.244

2.  EGFR mutations are significantly associated with visceral pleural invasion development in non-small-cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Jinghan Shi; Yang Yang; Yanfeng Zhao; Junjie Zhu; Xiao Song; Gening Jiang
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.989

3.  Using combined CT-clinical radiomics models to identify epidermal growth factor receptor mutation subtypes in lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Ji-Wen Huo; Tian-You Luo; Le Diao; Fa-Jin Lv; Wei-Dao Chen; Rui-Ze Yu; Qi Li
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 5.738

4.  The past, present, and future management of brain metastases in EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Paul W Sperduto; Emil Lou
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 12.300

5.  The association between rs16917496 T/C polymorphism of SET8 gene and cancer risk in Asian populations: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Hui-Xia Wei; Guo-Xiang Tian; Ju-Kun Song; Lian-Jie Yang; Yu-Pei Wang
Journal:  Biosci Rep       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 3.840

6.  Correlation of pulmonary venous circulating tumor cells with clinicopathological parameters in patients with early-stage lung adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Shi-Bin Xu; Ming-Ran Xie; Cai-Wei Li; Xian-Ning Wu; Mei-Qing Xu
Journal:  Transl Cancer Res       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.241

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.