Literature DB >> 29361407

Kinematic measures for upper limb robot-assisted therapy following stroke and correlations with clinical outcome measures: A review.

Vi Do Tran1, Paolo Dario2, Stefano Mazzoleni3.   

Abstract

AIM OF THE STUDY: This review classifies the kinematic measures used to evaluate post-stroke motor impairment following upper limb robot-assisted rehabilitation and investigates their correlations with clinical outcome measures.
METHODS: An online literature search was carried out in PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus and IEEE-Xplore databases. Kinematic parameters mentioned in the studies included were categorized into the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) domains. The correlations between these parameters and the clinical scales were summarized.
RESULTS: Forty-nine kinematic parameters were identified from 67 articles involving 1750 patients. The most frequently used parameters were: movement speed, movement accuracy, peak speed, number of speed peaks, and movement distance and duration. According to the ICF domains, 44 kinematic parameters were categorized into Body Functions and Structure, 5 into Activities and no parameters were categorized into Participation and Personal and Environmental Factors. Thirteen articles investigated the correlations between kinematic parameters and clinical outcome measures. Some kinematic measures showed a significant correlation coefficient with clinical scores, but most were weak or moderate.
CONCLUSIONS: The proposed classification of kinematic measures into ICF domains and their correlations with clinical scales could contribute to identifying the most relevant ones for an integrated assessment of upper limb robot-assisted rehabilitation treatments following stroke. Increasing the assessment frequency by means of kinematic parameters could optimize clinical assessment procedures and enhance the effectiveness of rehabilitation treatments.
Copyright © 2018 IPEM. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ICF; Rehabilitation; Robotics; Stroke; Upper limb

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29361407     DOI: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2017.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Eng Phys        ISSN: 1350-4533            Impact factor:   2.242


  21 in total

1.  Relative independence of upper limb position sense and reaching in children with hemiparetic perinatal stroke.

Authors:  Andrea M Kuczynski; Adam Kirton; Jennifer A Semrau; Sean P Dukelow
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-05-12       Impact factor: 4.262

2.  A data-driven framework for selecting and validating digital health metrics: use-case in neurological sensorimotor impairments.

Authors:  Christoph M Kanzler; Mike D Rinderknecht; Anne Schwarz; Ilse Lamers; Cynthia Gagnon; Jeremia P O Held; Peter Feys; Andreas R Luft; Roger Gassert; Olivier Lambercy
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2020-05-29

3.  Movement Velocity and Fluidity Improve after Armeo®Spring Rehabilitation in Children Affected by Acquired and Congenital Brain Diseases: An Observational Study.

Authors:  Emilia Biffi; Cristina Maghini; Beatrice Cairo; Elena Beretta; Elisabetta Peri; Daniele Altomonte; Davide Mazzoli; Meris Giacobbi; Paolo Prati; Andrea Merlo; Sandra Strazzer
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-11-18       Impact factor: 3.411

4.  End-point kinematics using virtual reality explaining upper limb impairment and activity capacity in stroke.

Authors:  Netha Hussain; Katharina S Sunnerhagen; Margit Alt Murphy
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 4.262

5.  Kinematic Parameters for Tracking Patient Progress during Upper Limb Robot-Assisted Rehabilitation: An Observational Study on Subacute Stroke Subjects.

Authors:  Michela Goffredo; Stefano Mazzoleni; Annalisa Gison; Francesco Infarinato; Sanaz Pournajaf; Daniele Galafate; Maurizio Agosti; Federico Posteraro; Marco Franceschini
Journal:  Appl Bionics Biomech       Date:  2019-10-21       Impact factor: 1.781

6.  Low-cost equipment for the evaluation of reach and grasp in post-stroke individuals: a pilot study.

Authors:  Camila L A Gomes; Roberta O Cacho; Viviane T B Nobrega; Ellen Marjorie de A Confessor; Eyshila Emanuelle M de Farias; José Leôncio F Neto; Denise S de Araújo; Ana Loyse de S Medeiros; Rodrigo L Barreto; Enio W A Cacho
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2020-03-04       Impact factor: 2.819

7.  Clinical validation of kinematic assessments of post-stroke upper limb movements with a multi-joint arm exoskeleton.

Authors:  Florian Grimm; Jelena Kraugmann; Georgios Naros; Alireza Gharabaghi
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.262

8.  Robotic Assisted Upper Limb Training Post Stroke: A Randomized Control Trial Using Combinatory Approach Toward Reducing Workforce Demands.

Authors:  Aamani Budhota; Karen S G Chua; Asif Hussain; Simone Kager; Adèle Cherpin; Sara Contu; Deshmukh Vishwanath; Christopher W K Kuah; Chwee Yin Ng; Lester H L Yam; Yong Joo Loh; Deshan Kumar Rajeswaran; Liming Xiang; Etienne Burdet; Domenico Campolo
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-06-02       Impact factor: 4.003

9.  Reliability, validity and discriminant ability of the instrumental indices provided by a novel planar robotic device for upper limb rehabilitation.

Authors:  Marco Germanotta; Arianna Cruciani; Cristiano Pecchioli; Simona Loreti; Albino Spedicato; Matteo Meotti; Rita Mosca; Gabriele Speranza; Francesca Cecchi; Giorgia Giannarelli; Luca Padua; Irene Aprile
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2018-05-16       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Translational effects of robot-mediated therapy in subacute stroke patients: an experimental evaluation of upper limb motor recovery.

Authors:  Eduardo Palermo; Darren Richard Hayes; Emanuele Francesco Russo; Rocco Salvatore Calabrò; Alessandra Pacilli; Serena Filoni
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.