Ines Bersch1,2, Sabrina Koch-Borner3, Jan Fridén3,4. 1. Swiss Paraplegic Centre, Nottwil, Switzerland. ines.bersch@paraplegie.ch. 2. Institute of Clinical Sciences, Department of Orthopaedics at the University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden. ines.bersch@paraplegie.ch. 3. Swiss Paraplegic Centre, Nottwil, Switzerland. 4. Centre for Advanced Reconstruction of Extremities (CARE), Tetraplegia, Hand Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital and the Sahlgrenska, Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Göteborg, Sweden.
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective data analysis OBJECTIVES: To define the distribution of the motor points and excitability of the key wrist and finger actuators in order to detect upper (UMN) and lower motor neuron (LMN) lesions potentially influencing the development of a tenodesis grasp. SETTING: A rehabilitation centre for spinal cord injuries, Nottwil, Switzerland. METHODS: Forearm muscles of 32 patients with tetraplegia (AIS A-D) were tested bilaterally with electrical stimulation (ES) to differentiate whether UMN or LMN was present. For testing, a standardised mapping was developed. All patients underwent the same positioning schedule. RESULTS: Sixteen hands developed a tenodesis grasps, 24 hands showed neither shortening nor tightening of the finger flexors. Two patients developed unilateral tenodesis grasp and showed no tightening of the finger flexors on the contralateral hand. Seven patients developed tenodesis grasps symmetrically and bilaterally, whereas one maintained an essentially open hand without tightening of the finger flexors. All hands that developed a tenodesis grasp showed a LMN lesion of the M. extensor digitorum communis (EDC). The frequency of the tenodesis grasp differed significantly between the groups with and without intact reflex arc (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Surface ES may serve as a diagnostic tool to detect an UMN or LMN lesion of the key actuator muscles affecting the tenodesis grasp. These findings provide information that is essential for the choice of treatment to optimise function of the tetraplegic hand.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective data analysis OBJECTIVES: To define the distribution of the motor points and excitability of the key wrist and finger actuators in order to detect upper (UMN) and lower motor neuron (LMN) lesions potentially influencing the development of a tenodesis grasp. SETTING: A rehabilitation centre for spinal cord injuries, Nottwil, Switzerland. METHODS: Forearm muscles of 32 patients with tetraplegia (AIS A-D) were tested bilaterally with electrical stimulation (ES) to differentiate whether UMN or LMN was present. For testing, a standardised mapping was developed. All patients underwent the same positioning schedule. RESULTS: Sixteen hands developed a tenodesis grasps, 24 hands showed neither shortening nor tightening of the finger flexors. Two patients developed unilateral tenodesis grasp and showed no tightening of the finger flexors on the contralateral hand. Seven patients developed tenodesis grasps symmetrically and bilaterally, whereas one maintained an essentially open hand without tightening of the finger flexors. All hands that developed a tenodesis grasp showed a LMN lesion of the M. extensor digitorum communis (EDC). The frequency of the tenodesis grasp differed significantly between the groups with and without intact reflex arc (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Surface ES may serve as a diagnostic tool to detect an UMN or LMN lesion of the key actuator muscles affecting the tenodesis grasp. These findings provide information that is essential for the choice of treatment to optimise function of the tetraplegic hand.
Authors: Anne M Bryden; Harry A Hoyen; Michael W Keith; Melvin Mejia; Kevin L Kilgore; Gregory A Nemunaitis Journal: Arch Phys Med Rehabil Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 3.966
Authors: Jayme A Bertelli; Cristiano P Tacca; Marcos F Ghizoni; Paulo Roberto Kechele; Marcos Antonio Santos Journal: J Hand Surg Am Date: 2010-10 Impact factor: 2.230