| Literature DB >> 29357836 |
Guang-Hua Xu1, Ning Lou1, Hang-Chuan Shi1, Yu-Chen Xu1, Hai-Long Ruan1, Wen Xiao1, Lei Liu1, Xiang Li1, Hai-Bing Xiao1, Bin Qiu1, Lin Bao1, Chang-Fei Yuan1, Ya-Li Zhou2, Wen-Jun Hu2, Ke Chen1, Hong-Mei Yang3, Xiao-Ping Zhang4.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-BI) has been reported to be involved in carcinogenesis of several human cancers. However, it is currently unknown whether SR-BI plays a role in clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Here, we aimed to evaluate a tumor promotive mechanism for SR-BI in ccRCC.Entities:
Keywords: Clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC); Prognostic biomarker; Progression; Scavenger receptor class B type I (SR-BI)
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2018 PMID: 29357836 PMCID: PMC5778766 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-017-3761-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Cancer ISSN: 1471-2407 Impact factor: 4.430
Fig. 1Overexpression of SR-BI in ccRCC. Relative mRNA expression of SR-BI in normal kidney and ccRCC tissues (a), normal kidney cell line and ccRCC cell lines (b) by qRT-PCR. Protein expression of SR-BI in normal kidney and ccRCC tissues (c), normal kidney cell line and ccRCC cell lines (d) by western blot. Representative images of ORO staining, HE staining and IHC analysis of SR-BI protein in normal kidney and ccRCC tissues (e) (original magnification ×400). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01
Correlation between SR-BI mRNA expression and clinicopathological parameters of ccRCC patients
| SR-BI mRNA expression | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Features | Number | Low ( | High ( |
|
| Gender | 0.146 | |||
| Male | 67 | 37 | 30 | |
| Female | 46 | 19 | 27 | |
| Age (years) | 0.290 | |||
| ≤ 60 | 74 | 34 | 40 | |
| > 60 | 39 | 22 | 17 | |
| Tumor size (cm) |
| |||
| ≤ 4.0 | 33 | 22 | 11 | |
| > 4.0 | 80 | 34 | 46 | |
| Furman grade |
| |||
| G1 + G2 | 75 | 32 | 43 | |
| G3 + G4 | 38 | 24 | 14 | |
| Tumor stage | 0.222 | |||
| T1 + T2 | 83 | 44 | 39 | |
| T3 + T4 | 30 | 12 | 18 | |
| N metastasis | 0.298 | |||
| Negative | 97 | 50 | 47 | |
| Positive | 16 | 6 | 10 | |
| M metastasis |
| |||
| M0 | 105 | 56 | 49 | |
| M1 | 8 | 0 | 8 | |
| TNM stage | 0.144 | |||
| I + II | 74 | 40 | 34 | |
| III + IV | 39 | 15 | 23 | |
| Venous invasion | 0.283* | |||
| Yes | 8 | 2 | 6 | |
| No | 105 | 54 | 51 | |
| Location side | 0.512 | |||
| Left | 58 | 27 | 31 | |
| Right | 55 | 29 | 26 | |
*Fisher’s exact test
Fig. 2Prognostic value of SR-BI expression in ccRCC patients. a Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated that patients with tumors that expressed high levels of SR-BI had a shorter PFS. b Mann–Whitney test showed that patients with tumors that expressed high SR-BI levels had a stronger potential of distant metastasis. **P < 0.01
Cox regression analysis of PFS rate in 113 ccRCC patients
| Variables | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR | 95%CI | HR | 95%CI | |||
| Gender | 0.384 | 0.163–0.908 |
| 0.131 | 0.046–0.374 |
|
| Age | 1.144 | 0.526–2.489 | 0.735 | |||
| Tumor size | 8.742 | 2.036–37.546 |
| 11.696 | 2.433–56.216 |
|
| Furman grade | 1.704 | 0.800–3.628 | 0.167 | |||
| T stage | 1.610 | 0.700–3.703 | 0.263 | |||
| N metastasis | 5.593 | 2.409–12.984 |
| 2.786 | 0.904–8.580 | 0.074 |
| M metastasis | 5.730 | 2.107–15.583 |
| 2.221 | 0.714–6.909 | 0.168 |
| TNM stage | 4.363 | 2.014–9.451 |
| 1.895 | 0.654–5.494 | 0.239 |
| Venous invasion | 1.605 | 0.483–5.338 | 0.440 | |||
| Location side | 1.022 | 0.487–2.147 | 0.954 | |||
| SR-BI expression | 3.014 | 1.317–6.898 |
| 2.926 | 1.175–7.285 |
|
HR hazard ratio, CI confidence interval
Fig. 3Knockdown of SR-BI inhibited the growth of ccRCC cells. Expression of SR-BI mRNA (a) and protein (b) was effectively inhibited by specific siRNA in ccRCC cell lines. MTT assays showed that proliferative ability of ccRCC cells transfected with si-SR-BI significantly decreased compared with control cells (c). Plate colony formation assays exhibited that ccRCC cells transfected with si-SR-BI formed fewer colonies than control cells (d-e). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01
Fig. 4Knockdown of SR-BI attenuated migration (a) and invasion (b) of ccRCC cells. Wound closure assays showed that 786-O (c, e) and Caki-1 (d, f) cells transfected with si-SR-BI healed the gaps much slower than control cells at the indicated time points. *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001
Fig. 5Knockdown of SR-BI inhibited the up-take of HDL-cholesterol. Representative images of ORO staining for ccRCC cells after transfection with siRNA (a). The cholesterol content in ccRCC cells transfected with specific si-SR-BI was much less than control cells (b). The cholesterol content in extracellular media was significantly higher after cells transfection with si-SR-BI (c). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001
Fig. 6Reduction of SR-BI expression induced by si-SR-BI suppressed the AKT pathway and MMP-2/9 expression