| Literature DB >> 29356993 |
Charlotte A Porter1, Kevin M Bradley2, Eero T Hippeläinen3, Matthew D Walker4, Daniel R McGowan4,5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Post-therapy SPECT/CT imaging of 90Y microspheres delivered to hepatic malignancies is difficult, owing to the continuous, high-energy Bremsstrahlung spectrum emitted by 90Y. This study aimed to evaluate the utility of a commercially available software package (HybridRecon, Hermes Medical Solutions AB) which incorporates full Monte Carlo collimator modelling. Analysis of image quality was performed on both phantom and clinical images in order to ultimately provide a recommendation of an optimum reconstruction for post-therapy 90Y microsphere SPECT/CT imaging. A 3D-printed anthropomorphic liver phantom was filled with 90Y with a sphere-to-background ratio of 4:1 and imaged on a GE Discovery 670 SPECT/CT camera. Datasets were reconstructed using ordered-subsets expectation maximization (OSEM) 1-7 iterations in order to identify the optimal OSEM reconstruction (5 iterations, 15 subsets). Quantitative analysis was subsequently carried out on phantom datasets obtained using four reconstruction algorithms: the default OSEM protocol (2 iterations, 10 subsets) and the optimised OSEM protocol, both with and without full Monte Carlo collimator modelling. The quantitative metrics contrast recovery (CR) and background variability (BV) were calculated. The four algorithms were then used to retrospectively reconstruct 10 selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) patient datasets which were subsequently blind scored for image quality by a consultant radiologist.Entities:
Keywords: Image reconstruction; Monte Carlo scatter correction; Quantitative SPECT; Yttrium-90 Bremsstrahlung
Year: 2018 PMID: 29356993 PMCID: PMC5778088 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-018-0361-0
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EJNMMI Res ISSN: 2191-219X Impact factor: 3.138
Fig. 1a The AbdoMan™ phantom, showing the fillable spheres mounted in the liver insert [19]. b Schematic representation of transaxial slice of AbdoMan™ phantom showing positions of spheres (A = 20-mm sphere, B = 40-mm sphere with 25-mm solid core, C = 40-mm sphere, D = 10-mm sphere, E = 30-mm sphere) N.B. Spheres were not all located on the same slice, but are shown here on the same slice for ease
Criteria against which the consultant radiologist was asked to score the patient reconstructions
| Category | Possible scores |
|---|---|
| Overall image quality | 1, poor—5, excellent |
| Lesion detectability | 1, poor—5, excellent |
| Visibility of necrotic regions | 1, poor—5, excellent |
| Liver background noise | 1, unacceptable—5, minimal |
Fig. 2Number of iterations plotted against contrast recovery for the 40- and 30-mm sphere sizes. The number of subsets was 15
Fig. 3Effect of full Monte Carlo collimator modelling on a contrast recovery (p values left to right = 0.041, 0.048, 0.086, 0.040) and b background variability for the 40- and 30-mm sphere sizes. Error bars indicate the standard error
Results from clinical evaluation of patient images. Numbers are mean averages over all 10 patients and numbers in brackets indicate the standard deviation
| Recon. | Overall image Quality | Lesion Detectability | Visibility of necrotic regions (where applicable) | Liver background Noise level | Total | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No MC | MC | No MC | MC | No MC | MC | No MC | MC | No MC | MC | |
| Default | 3.5 (0.71) | 3.5 (0.71) | 3.4 (0.52) | 3.2 (0.63) | 3.2 (0.79) | 3.3 (0.67) | 5 (0) | 5 (0) | 15.1 (1.52) | 15 (1.63) |
| Optimised | 5 (0) | 5 (0) | 5 (0) | 5 (0) | 5 (0) | 5 (0) | 4.6 (0.52) | 5 (0) | 19.6 (0.52) | 20 (0) |
Fig. 4Transaxial slices showing distribution of microspheres in the liver of a patient. Left: default OSEM (2 iterations, 10 subsets); middle: optimised OSEM (5 iterations, 15 subsets); right: optimised OSEM with full MC collimator modelling