UNLABELLED: Compliance with radiobiologic principles of radionuclide internal dosimetry is fundamental to the success of (90)Y radioembolization. The artery-specific SPECT/CT partition model is an image-guided personalized predictive dosimetric technique developed by our institution, integrating catheter-directed CT hepatic angiography (CTHA), (99m)Tc-macroaggregated albumin SPECT/CT, and partition modeling for unified dosimetry. Catheter-directed CTHA accurately delineates planning target volumes. SPECT/CT tomographically evaluates (99m)Tc-macroaggregated albumin hepatic biodistribution. The partition model is validated for (90)Y resin microspheres based on MIRD macrodosimetry. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of our early clinical outcomes for inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma. Mapping hepatic angiography was performed according to standard technique with the addition of catheter-directed CTHA. (99m)Tc-MAA planar scintigraphy was used for liver-to-lung shunt estimation, and SPECT/CT was used for liver dosimetry. Artery-specific SPECT/CT partition modeling was planned by experienced nuclear medicine physicians. RESULTS: From January to May 2011, 20 arterial territories were treated in 10 hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Median follow-up was 21 wk (95% confidence interval [CI], 12-50 wk). When analyzed strictly as brachytherapy, (90)Y radioembolization planned by predictive dosimetry achieved index tumor regression in 8 of 8 patients, with a median size decrease of 58% (95% CI, 40%-72%). Tumor thrombosis regressed or remained stable in 3 of 4 patients with baseline involvement. The best α-fetoprotein reduction ranged from 32% to 95%. Clinical success was achieved in 7 of 8 patients, including 2 by sublesional dosimetry, in 1 of whom there was radioembolization lobectomy intent. Median predicted mean radiation absorbed doses were 106 Gy (95% CI, 105-146 Gy) to tumor, 27 Gy (95% CI, 22-33 Gy) to nontumorous liver, and 2 Gy (95% CI, 1.3-7.3 Gy) to lungs. Across all patients, tumor, nontumorous liver, and lungs received predicted ≥91 Gy, ≤51 Gy, and ≤16 Gy, respectively, via at least 1 target arterial territory. No patients developed significant toxicities within 3 mo after radioembolization. The median time to best imaging response was 76 d (95% CI, 55-114 d). Median time to progression and overall survival were not reached. SPECT/CT-derived mean tumor-to-normal liver ratios varied widely across all planning target volumes (median, 5.4; 95% CI, 4.1-6.7), even within the same patient. CONCLUSION: Image-guided personalized predictive dosimetry by artery-specific SPECT/CT partition modeling achieves high clinical success rates for safe and effective (90)Y radioembolization.
UNLABELLED: Compliance with radiobiologic principles of radionuclide internal dosimetry is fundamental to the success of (90)Y radioembolization. The artery-specific SPECT/CT partition model is an image-guided personalized predictive dosimetric technique developed by our institution, integrating catheter-directed CT hepatic angiography (CTHA), (99m)Tc-macroaggregated albumin SPECT/CT, and partition modeling for unified dosimetry. Catheter-directed CTHA accurately delineates planning target volumes. SPECT/CT tomographically evaluates (99m)Tc-macroaggregated albumin hepatic biodistribution. The partition model is validated for (90)Y resin microspheres based on MIRD macrodosimetry. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of our early clinical outcomes for inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma. Mapping hepatic angiography was performed according to standard technique with the addition of catheter-directed CTHA. (99m)Tc-MAA planar scintigraphy was used for liver-to-lung shunt estimation, and SPECT/CT was used for liver dosimetry. Artery-specific SPECT/CT partition modeling was planned by experienced nuclear medicine physicians. RESULTS: From January to May 2011, 20 arterial territories were treated in 10 hepatocellular carcinomapatients. Median follow-up was 21 wk (95% confidence interval [CI], 12-50 wk). When analyzed strictly as brachytherapy, (90)Y radioembolization planned by predictive dosimetry achieved index tumor regression in 8 of 8 patients, with a median size decrease of 58% (95% CI, 40%-72%). Tumor thrombosis regressed or remained stable in 3 of 4 patients with baseline involvement. The best α-fetoprotein reduction ranged from 32% to 95%. Clinical success was achieved in 7 of 8 patients, including 2 by sublesional dosimetry, in 1 of whom there was radioembolization lobectomy intent. Median predicted mean radiation absorbed doses were 106 Gy (95% CI, 105-146 Gy) to tumor, 27 Gy (95% CI, 22-33 Gy) to nontumorous liver, and 2 Gy (95% CI, 1.3-7.3 Gy) to lungs. Across all patients, tumor, nontumorous liver, and lungs received predicted ≥91 Gy, ≤51 Gy, and ≤16 Gy, respectively, via at least 1 target arterial territory. No patients developed significant toxicities within 3 mo after radioembolization. The median time to best imaging response was 76 d (95% CI, 55-114 d). Median time to progression and overall survival were not reached. SPECT/CT-derived mean tumor-to-normal liver ratios varied widely across all planning target volumes (median, 5.4; 95% CI, 4.1-6.7), even within the same patient. CONCLUSION: Image-guided personalized predictive dosimetry by artery-specific SPECT/CT partition modeling achieves high clinical success rates for safe and effective (90)Y radioembolization.
Authors: Christophe Van de Wiele; Alex Maes; Eddy Brugman; Yves D'Asseler; Bart De Spiegeleer; Gilles Mees; Karin Stellamans Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2012-07-17 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Aaron K T Tong; Yung Hsiang Kao; Chow Wei Too; Kenneth F W Chin; David C E Ng; Pierce K H Chow Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2016-03-24 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: Yuni K Dewaraja; Se Young Chun; Ravi N Srinivasa; Ravi K Kaza; Kyle C Cuneo; Bill S Majdalany; Paula M Novelli; Michael Ljungberg; Jeffrey A Fessler Journal: Med Phys Date: 2017-10-28 Impact factor: 4.071
Authors: Justin K Mikell; Bill S Majdalany; Dawn Owen; Kelly C Paradis; Yuni K Dewaraja Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2019-04-22 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Justin K Mikell; Ravi K Kaza; Peter L Roberson; Kelly C Younge; Ravi N Srinivasa; Bill S Majdalany; Kyle C Cuneo; Dawn Owen; Theresa Devasia; Matthew J Schipper; Yuni K Dewaraja Journal: EJNMMI Phys Date: 2018-11-30
Authors: Hian Liang Huang; Aaron Kian Ti Tong; Sue Ping Thang; Sean Xuexian Yan; Winnie Wing Chuen Lam; Kelvin Siu Hoong Loke; Charlene Yu Lin Tang; Lenith Tai Jit Cheng; Gideon Su Kai Ooi; Han Chung Low; Butch Maulion Magsombol; Wei Ying Tham; Charles Xian Yang Goh; Colin Jingxian Tan; Yiu Ming Khor; Sumbul Zaheer; Pushan Bharadwaj; Wanying Xie; David Chee Eng Ng Journal: Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2019-01-25