| Literature DB >> 29356983 |
Yvonne W S Jauw1, Marc C Huisman2, Tapan K Nayak3, Danielle J Vugts2, Randolph Christen4, Valerie Meresse Naegelen3, Dominik Ruettinger5, Florian Heil5, Adriaan A Lammertsma2, Henk M W Verheul6, Otto S Hoekstra2, Guus A M S van Dongen2, C Willemien Menke-van der Houven van Oordt6.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ideally, monoclonal antibodies provide selective treatment by targeting the tumour, without affecting normal tissues. Therefore, antibody imaging is of interest, preferably in early stages of drug development. However, the imaging signal consists of specific, as well as non-specific, uptake. The aim of this study was to assess specific, target-mediated uptake in normal tissues, with immuno-PET in a phase I dose escalation study, using the anti-CD44 antibody RG7356 as example.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-CD44 humanized antibody; Antibody; Molecular imaging; PET; RG7356
Year: 2018 PMID: 29356983 PMCID: PMC5778091 DOI: 10.1186/s13550-018-0358-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: EJNMMI Res Impact factor: 3.138
Fig. 1Immuno-PET signal components in a phase I dose escalation study. The tissue-to-blood ratio is shown as a function of administered antibody dose. For example, target antigen-mediated uptake is dose-dependent, while blood volume fraction, catabolism or elimination are dose-independent accumulation mechanisms
Patient details
| Patient | Gender | Tumour type | CD44 expression (IHC) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Membrane score | H-score | Biopsy location | |||
| 1 | F | Squamous cell carcinoma cervix | 3 | 285 | Lung |
| 2 | M | Adenocarcinoma oesophagus | 2 (focal) | 30 | Oesophagus |
| 3 | M | Colorectal carcinoma | 2 (focal) | 25 | Liver |
| 4 | M | Melanoma | 3 | 250 | Liver |
| 5 | M | Colorectal carcinoma | 2 | 130 | Peritoneal |
| 6 | F | Squamous cell carcinoma cervix | 2 (focal) | 65 | Cervix |
| 7 | M | Basaloid carcinoma tonsil | 3 | 135 | Lung |
| 8 | M | Squamous cell carcinoma oesophagus | 3 | 210 | Neck left |
| 9 | M | Colorectal carcinoma | 2 | 85 | Liver |
| 10 | M | Cholangiocarcinoma | 3 | 200 | Liver |
| 11 | F | Squamous cell carcinoma ear canal | 3 | 260 | Neck left |
| 12 | M | Colorectal carcinoma | 2 (focal) | 35 | Liver |
| 13 | M | Colorectal carcinoma | 3 | 218 | Liver |
Fig. 2Biodistribution of 89Zr-labelled-RG7356. a As function of time: maximum intensity projections at 1, 24 and 96 h p.i. for patient 12 (675 mg dose cohort). b As function of total administered antibody dose: maximum intensity projections at 96 h p.i. for various dose cohorts (1, 100, 200, 450 and 675 mg)
Fig. 3Blood pool concentrations of 89Zr-RG7356 and RG7356. a Radioactivity concentrations of 89Zr-RG7356 in blood pool as function of time. b Antibody concentrations of RG7356 in blood pool as function of time. c AUC of the time antibody concentration curve of RG7356 in blood pool as function of antibody dose. Data is presented as mean; error bars represent SD
Fig. 4Tissue-to-blood AUC ratio of RG7356 as a function of antibody dose. a Ratios for spleen, liver, bonemarrow, kidney and lung. b Ratio for brain. Data is presented as mean; error bars represent SD
Tumour uptake of 89Zr-RG7356 and RG7356 at 96 h p.i.
| Patient | Dose cohort (mg) | Visual assessment | Localisation | SUVpeak | AUC (mg h/mL) | Tumour-to-blood AUC ratio |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | − | − | − | − | − |
| 2 | 100 | − | − | − | − | − |
| 3 | 100 | * | − | − | − | − |
| 4 | 100 | − | − | − | − | − |
| 5 | 200 | − | − | − | − | − |
| 6 | 200 | − | − | − | − | − |
| 7 | 450 | + | Brain L | 1.8 | 0.35 | 0.09 |
| Lung R | 8.4 | 2.06 | 0.55 | |||
| 8 | 450 | + | Skull L | 3.3 | 1.41 | 0.43 |
| Upper neck L | 3.5 | 1.62 | 0.49 | |||
| Lower neck L | 2.8 | 1.43 | 0.43 | |||
| Supraclavicular R | 3.1 | 1.67 | 0.50 | |||
| Mediastinal | 4.8 | 2.37 | 0.72 | |||
| Lung L | 2.2 | 1.29 | 0.39 | |||
| Lung R1 | 2.1 | 1.06 | 0.32 | |||
| Lung R2 | 4.3 | 1.75 | 0.53 | |||
| 9 | 450 | + | Lung L | 1.8 | 0.89 | 0.32 |
| Lung R | 2.2 | 0.99 | 0.36 | |||
| Rectum | 5.6 | 1.75 | 0.64 | |||
| 10 | 450 | + | Lung L | 4.6 | 1.47 | 0.56 |
| Lung R | 3.9 | 1.41 | 0.53 | |||
| 11 | 450 | + | Mastoid L | 4.5 | 1.81 | 0.42 |
| 12 | 675 | + | Sigmoid L | 4.9 | 2.55 | 0.59 |
| 13 | 675 | + | Pelvic R | 6.5 | 3.83 | 0.73 |
| Sacrum | 8.1 | 3.29 | 0.63 |
− no visible tumour uptake
*Diffuse uptake in the lung
Fig. 5Example of tumour uptake of 89Zr-RG7356 at 96 h p.i.. Tumour lesion mediastinal/in the aorta–pulmonary window (patient 8, 450 mg cohort). a Low dose CT. b Attenuation-corrected PET. c Fused image