Literature DB >> 29356343

Metataxonomic approach to decipher the polymicrobial burden in diabetic foot ulcer and its biofilm mode of infection.

Karthika Suryaletha1,2, Joby John3, Megha Periyappilly Radhakrishnan1, Sanil George4, Sabu Thomas1.   

Abstract

Chronic diabetic foot is a global burden affecting millions of people, and the chronicity of an ulcer is directly linked to the diverse bacterial burden and its biofilm mode of infection. The bacterial diversity of 100 chronic diabetic ulcer samples was profiled via traditional culturing method as well as metagenomic approach by sequencing the 16S rRNA V3 hyper-variable region on Illumina Miseq Platform (Illumina, Inc., San Diego, CA). All the relevant clinical metadata, including duration of diabetes, grade of ulcer, presence of neuropathy, and glycaemic level, were noted and correlated with the microbiota. The occurrence and establishment of bacterial biofilm over chronic wound tissues was revealed by Fluorescent in situ Hybridization and Scanning Electron Microscopy. The biofilm-forming ability of predominant bacterial isolates was studied via crystal violet assay and Confocal Laser Scanning Microscopy. The dominant phyla obtained from bacterial diversity analysis were Firmicutes, Proteobacteria, and Actinobacteria. The dominant aerobic pathogens identified by culture method are Pseudomonas, Proteus, Enterococcus, and Staphylococcus, whereas high-throughput sequencing revealed heightened levels of Streptococcus and Corynebacterium along with 22 different obligate anaerobes. The biofilm occurrence in chronic diabetic ulcer infection is well analysed. Herein, we illustrate the comprehensive pattern of bacterial infection and identify the community composition of chronic wound pathogenic biofilm.
© 2018 Medicalhelplines.com Inc and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  bacterial biofilm; diabetic ulcer; metagenomics; polymicrobial infection

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29356343      PMCID: PMC7949765          DOI: 10.1111/iwj.12888

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Wound J        ISSN: 1742-4801            Impact factor:   3.315


  36 in total

Review 1.  Wound microbiology and associated approaches to wound management.

Authors:  P G Bowler; B I Duerden; D G Armstrong
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Antimicrobial susceptibilities and clinical sources of Facklamia species.

Authors:  L LaClaire; R Facklam
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Biofilms in chronic wounds.

Authors:  Garth A James; Ellen Swogger; Randall Wolcott; Elinor deLancey Pulcini; Patrick Secor; Jennifer Sestrich; John W Costerton; Philip S Stewart
Journal:  Wound Repair Regen       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 3.617

Review 4.  The global burden of diabetic foot disease.

Authors:  Andrew J M Boulton; Loretta Vileikyte; Gunnel Ragnarson-Tennvall; Jan Apelqvist
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005-11-12       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Confocal laser microscopic observation of glycocalyx production by Staphylococcus aureus in vitro.

Authors:  Hisanori Akiyama; W-K Huh; Kazuyasu Fujii; Osamu Yamasaki; Takashi Oono; Keiji Iwatsuki
Journal:  J Dermatol Sci       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 4.563

6.  A prospective study of risk factors for diabetic foot ulcer. The Seattle Diabetic Foot Study.

Authors:  E J Boyko; J H Ahroni; V Stensel; R C Forsberg; D R Davignon; D G Smith
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 19.112

7.  Diabetic foot complications and their risk factors from a large retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Khalid Al-Rubeaan; Mohammad Al Derwish; Samir Ouizi; Amira M Youssef; Shazia N Subhani; Heba M Ibrahim; Bader N Alamri
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Practical criteria for screening patients at high risk for diabetic foot ulceration.

Authors:  L A Lavery; D G Armstrong; S A Vela; T L Quebedeaux; J G Fleischli
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1998-01-26

9.  Wohlfahrtiimonas chitiniclastica-associated osteomyelitis: a rare case report.

Authors:  Karthika Suryalatha; Joby John; Sabu Thomas
Journal:  Future Microbiol       Date:  2015-06-29       Impact factor: 3.165

10.  One step closer to understanding the role of bacteria in diabetic foot ulcers: characterising the microbiome of ulcers.

Authors:  Karen Smith; Andrew Collier; Eleanor M Townsend; Lindsay E O'Donnell; Abhijit M Bal; John Butcher; William G Mackay; Gordon Ramage; Craig Williams
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.605

View more
  12 in total

1.  Microbial Community Distribution and Core Microbiome in Successive Wound Grades of Individuals with Diabetic Foot Ulcers.

Authors:  Apoorva Jnana; Vigneshwaran Muthuraman; Vinay Koshy Varghese; Sanjiban Chakrabarty; Thokur Sreepathy Murali; Lingadakai Ramachandra; Kallya Rajgopal Shenoy; Gabriel Sunil Rodrigues; Seetharam Shiva Prasad; Dhananjaya Dendukuri; Andreas Morschhauser; Joerg Nestler; Harald Peter; Frank F Bier; Kapaettu Satyamoorthy
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2020-03-02       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  The Ability of a Concentrated Surfactant Gel to Reduce an Aerobic, Anaerobic and Multispecies Bacterial Biofilm In Vitro.

Authors:  Anne-Marie Salisbury; Marc Mullin; Lauren Foulkes; Rui Chen; Steven L Percival
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

3.  Metataxonomic approach to decipher the polymicrobial burden in diabetic foot ulcer and its biofilm mode of infection.

Authors:  Karthika Suryaletha; Joby John; Megha Periyappilly Radhakrishnan; Sanil George; Sabu Thomas
Journal:  Int Wound J       Date:  2018-01-22       Impact factor: 3.315

4.  Polymicrobial Foot Infection Patterns Are Common and Associated With Treatment Failure.

Authors:  Neal R Barshes; Nicholas J Clark; Deeksha Bidare; J H Dudenhoeffer; Cezarina Mindru; Maria C Rodriguez-Barradas
Journal:  Open Forum Infect Dis       Date:  2022-09-15       Impact factor: 4.423

5.  Decoding the proteomic changes involved in the biofilm formation of Enterococcus faecalis SK460 to elucidate potential biofilm determinants.

Authors:  Karthika Suryaletha; Lekshmi Narendrakumar; Joby John; Megha Periyappilly Radhakrishnan; Sanil George; Sabu Thomas
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 3.605

6.  Influence of SIRT1 polymorphisms for diabetic foot susceptibility and severity.

Authors:  Yi Peng; Guishan Zhang; Hongxia Tang; Luling Dong; Chunbin Gao; Xiuhong Yang; Ying Peng; Yanrong Xu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.817

7.  Susceptibility of monomicrobial or polymicrobial biofilms derived from infected diabetic foot ulcers to topical or systemic antibiotics in vitro.

Authors:  Bianca L Price; Robert Morley; Frank L Bowling; Andrew M Lovering; Curtis B Dobson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Bacterial Diversity of Diabetic Foot Ulcers: Current Status and Future Prospectives.

Authors:  Fatemah Sadeghpour Heravi; Martha Zakrzewski; Karen Vickery; David G Armstrong; Honghua Hu
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2019-11-10       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 9.  Do Mixed-Species Biofilms Dominate in Chronic Infections?-Need for in situ Visualization of Bacterial Organization.

Authors:  Lasse Kvich; Mette Burmølle; Thomas Bjarnsholt; Mads Lichtenberg
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 5.293

10.  Association between intercellular adhesion molecule 1 (ICAM1) polymorphisms and diabetic foot susceptibility: A case-control study.

Authors:  Xue-Xia Cao; Jin-Kui Yang; Li Wang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.